Dear Guest
Thank you for visiting! est189 will soon be closing its doors (do forums have doors?) please visit the following thread - (to wail & cry perhaps?)
https://www.est1892.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?p=4002484#post4002484
Thanjk you.
Paul.S
The police watchdog has identified 13 "suspects" at the centre of the probe into the Hillsborough investigation.
The Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC) confirmed the individuals were a mixture of retired and serving officers.
It said 11 had already been interviewed under caution. A spokesman said the other two would be interviewed in the near future.
Fresh inquests into the 96 deaths will begin in Warrington on Monday.
The IPCC spokesman said four of the 13 had been identified as suspects as part of its investigation and also Operation Resolve, the criminal investigation into the tragedy.
The IPCC's inquiry covers the actions of the police in the aftermath of the crush at Hillsborough.
The football supporters were crushed during the FA Cup semi-final between Liverpool and Nottingham Forest at Sheffield Wednesday's stadium on 15 April 1989.
With the new inquests starting. What are the realistic outcomes. I've been looking into inquest verdicts and I'm not sure exactly what verdict could be given that will exonerate the fans/lay culpability at the authorities? By exonerate I of course mean in addition to the evidence that has been revealed subsequently that shows the complicity of the police in changing statements etc. Obv we know they are not to blame but the accidental death has that lingering 'nobody to blame' feel when we know negligence by certain authorities contributed to deaths. I've not seen an inquest verdict where negligence is a verdict - only accidental/unlawful.
If there any inquest verdict between 'accidental death' and 'unlawful killing' that would shift the pointed finger to the authorities?
The police are to blame, directly. Not letting the ambo's in was a direct cause of deaths. And not letting the ambo's in was done to cover their arse not in good faith.
If that doesn't make them directly culpable what's the point of a justice system?
It may be me being pessimistic given the fight for justice having been so long and problematic but I am cautious that may not be enough to bump it from negligent to 'unlawful'
I'm terrified that this fight will meet with a massive disappointment.
Yup. While their may be the potential for criminal investigations for the actions of the police in changing the statments it doesn't in itself count as evidence to their actions on the day being enough for an unlawful killing verdict.
"The appropriate standard of proof is that the unlawful killing must be beyond reasonable doubt. This is when the evidence was so overwhelmingly obvious that death would result, that no other thing is taken into account. If this standard is not met, a verdict of accidental death or death by misadventure should be considered on the balance of probabilities."
A Gunners fan puts a Hillsborough 25th anniversary Liverpool badge on his Arsenal shirt
Type “Adam Cooper JTF96″ or “Adam Cooper Liverpool” into Twitter’s search engine and you’ll find heart-warming messages from Liverpool fans in reaction to a Facebook post from an Arsenal supporter.
Adam Cooper, the said Arsenal fan, put a picture on his Facebook wall this week which has since gone viral.
The picture showed the fan’s Arsenal shirt with a Hillsborough 25th anniversary badge placed in the middle of the jersey.
The Gunners fan explained his actions in along with his picture, finishing his update with “Justice for the 96″.
What do you mean it could've been anyone? Name me one person who's got a grudge against penguins
Comment