Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Simon Mignolet

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by Exiled_red View Post
    I think it is different for GKs to outfield players, most outfield players will get opportunities at some point where as GKs are waiting for an injury or suspension.



    I don't understand how Mignolet's situation has come about, I am fairly confident that the club wouldn't have stood in the way of any serious offer for Mignolet. If a decent offer had come in surely we would have just brought in a backup GK and moved him on. Surely the situation was that no one wanted him, which isn't the club's fault.


    Or his wage demands were unrealistic or he thought he was good enough to wait for Barcelona and Real Madrid to fight over him.

    Comment


      Originally posted by topscorer View Post
      Or his wage demands were unrealistic or he thought he was good enough to wait for Barcelona and Real Madrid to fight over him.
      Well I would assume that with someone like Mignolet who the club aren't overly keen to keep they would let the club speak to him and then a hammer out details of a transfer fee etc after, maybe his wage demands were the reason that we weren't getting to that stage but again it's not the clubs fault.

      The only way that LFC are to blame for this is if someone came in with an offer and agreed terms with him and we said no we want to keep him as backup. In which case he would be letting us know about it now. Or we refused permission to let him speak to other clubs, but I just don't see either of those happening.
      The only gracious way to accept an insult is to ignore it; if you can't ignore it, top it; if you can't top it, laugh at it; if you can't laugh at it, it's probably deserved.

      Comment


        Originally posted by Exiled_red View Post
        Well I would assume that with someone like Mignolet who the club aren't overly keen to keep they would let the club speak to him and then a hammer out details of a transfer fee etc after, maybe his wage demands were the reason that we weren't getting to that stage but again it's not the clubs fault.

        The only way that LFC are to blame for this is if someone came in with an offer and agreed terms with him and we said no we want to keep him as backup. In which case he would be letting us know about it now. Or we refused permission to let him speak to other clubs, but I just don't see either of those happening.
        Nobody is to blame, it is what it is. If a player has a contract they just need to get on with it. But Karius has said that the klopp wanted him to stay but he decided he wanted to go this summer. Doesn't take too much imagination to see how that decision scuppered any plans that Mignolet had.
        Trey Nyoni: countdown to stardom- 2 years 1year 0.5 years

        Comment


          Originally posted by Kenneth View Post
          Nobody is to blame, it is what it is. If a player has a contract they just need to get on with it. But Karius has said that the klopp wanted him to stay but he decided he wanted to go this summer. Doesn't take too much imagination to see how that decision scuppered any plans that Mignolet had.
          Yes, although from what I read wasn't Mignolet frustrated that Karius was allowed to go on loan when he was denied the same opportunity? Potentially the fact it will likely become permanent makes the difference, don't think he was right to feel hard done by on that front. Like you say, there's obviously going to be irritation at being held to contract having not secured a move before Karius, but that's just tough cheddar.
          Like blood on iron

          Comment


            Originally posted by Exiled_red View Post
            Well I would assume that with someone like Mignolet who the club aren't overly keen to keep they would let the club speak to him and then a hammer out details of a transfer fee etc after, maybe his wage demands were the reason that we weren't getting to that stage but again it's not the clubs fault.



            The only way that LFC are to blame for this is if someone came in with an offer and agreed terms with him and we said no we want to keep him as backup. In which case he would be letting us know about it now. Or we refused permission to let him speak to other clubs, but I just don't see either of those happening.


            Yes it's definitely not the clubs fault, I'm inferring it's Migs fault.

            As someone has said earlier he's had since January to find a club because he pretty much decided he wanted to leave back then and he could have gone to exactly the same club as Karius and the rumors say it fell through because of wage demands.

            Comment


              Has he been injured while.on international duty?

              Last edited by baitman; 06-09-18, 08:05 AM.
              removing all the weak links makes us stronger

              too many gutless players, no beef or desire. pussies everywhere... sack them all.

              Comment


                Originally posted by baitman View Post
                Has he been injured while.on international duty?

                https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/www.l...erpool-belgium
                All the answers to this question are contained within the article that you posted
                Modifying post.

                Comment


                  Got to believe we'll have to replace him this summer making a decent saving on the 80 odd k a week he's on. Don't know much about him but Lossl from Huddersfield looks like a decent unstudy off the back of a few MOTD mins, although he's 30 already.

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by labourRed View Post
                    Got to believe we'll have to replace him this summer making a decent saving on the 80 odd k a week he's on. Don't know much about him but Lossl from Huddersfield looks like a decent unstudy off the back of a few MOTD mins, although he's 30 already.
                    6ft 5" being linked with a few teams too.
                    [ame="https://youtu.be/yFwzoB08_fs"]Jonas Lössl 2017/18 Amazing Saves - Huddersfield Town FC - YouTube[/ame]
                    removing all the weak links makes us stronger

                    too many gutless players, no beef or desire. pussies everywhere... sack them all.

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by labourRed View Post
                      Got to believe we'll have to replace him this summer making a decent saving on the 80 odd k a week he's on. Don't know much about him but Lossl from Huddersfield looks like a decent unstudy off the back of a few MOTD mins, although he's 30 already.
                      Lossl was ****ing dreadful against Utd, absolute amateur.
                      Was muß, das muß.

                      Comment


                        Like for like replacement then
                        Me, I’m either planning a holiday or I’m on one.

                        Comment


                          [ame="https://twitter.com/anfieldhq/status/1143118840513146880"]https://twitter.com/anfieldhq/status/1143118840513146880[/ame]

                          Comment


                            I'm more than happy with that.

                            Comment


                              Originally posted by poorscousertommy View Post
                              I'm more than happy with that.
                              Ya - me too, if Alisson got injured he’d have a settled defence being led by VVD in front of him.

                              Comment


                                Yeah that’s great, I don’t see us getting a better #2.

                                Give him the FA and League cups.
                                Modifying post.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X