Stoke (A) Post Match

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Chazza
    Des Lynam
    • Jan 2007
    • 31141

    #211
    It was a **** pass back to him by Toure though.

    We will end up blaming the whole team at this rate

    Comment

    • Chris
      Typing Tourettes is a thing
      • Jul 2006
      • 20697

      #212
      Originally posted by foresterbloke
      This game gave a fair indication of our spirit as a team and our confidence in our attacking ability.

      The Liverpool of a few years ago would have capitulated but we just go and score some more. It's great to see and I don't think we're a million miles from a title challenging side to be honest.
      Yep, our spirit is ****ing awesome, they properly done us over there last year but no more of that ****. All the momentum was with them at half time but we come back out and scored 3 more, Chelsea looked like they could batter our exhausted, injury hit team when they went 2-1 up but we didnt give in, alright we still lost but only by one and if the game was officiated fairly would have got at least a draw. We looked like we'd ****ed up the derby, losing with 7 mins left but back we come and should have won it etc. It's great.

      Comment

      • danperkins
        Martin Skrtel can win a game of Connect Four in three moves
        • May 2010
        • 50412

        #213
        Originally posted by Mattshark
        Disagree, can't give the ball away the way and in the position Henderson did. Skrtel closed down, the shot went through his legs.

        Comment

        • Daniel 7
          Heretic
          • Mar 2008
          • 24088

          #214
          Skrtel was moving backwards and allowed Adam too much space and time to shoot. Its the one talent the fat get has, hitting the ball hard with his left foot. Skrtel should have been on him. No way that shot should have been allowed to come in.

          Comment

          • G
            Paisley
            • Aug 2006
            • 16686

            #215
            Exactly, it's one of the good things about Sakho, he doesn't hang about around our area, he's out on top of players very quickly . Suarez on the first allowed the cross to come in too and as usual our CB's were beaten all ends up in the air. But he made amends so I'll forgive him

            Comment

            • Le Chef
              Paisley
              • Jul 2006
              • 10754

              #216
              One of my gripes is the way we slow the game to an almost crawl when we are 1 or 2 up, its happened a few times now, and we seem to concede and then we struggle to get going again. Don't get me wrong, I'm not expecting 100mph for 90 minutes, but I don't think we are as ruthless as we can should be.
              I make no apologies, this is me

              Comment

              • Lee
                Chunder camel
                • Dec 2006
                • 32028

                #217
                Originally posted by Daniel 7
                Skrtel was moving backwards and allowed Adam too much space and time to shoot. Its the one talent the fat get has, hitting the ball hard with his left foot. Skrtel should have been on him. No way that shot should have been allowed to come in.


                Skrtel wasn't the only one at fault but time and time again he backs off from the player and / or turns his back.

                I don't think he's as bad as some make out. I think he's got potential to be a good defender, but he has too many deficiencies to his game to start week in, week out.

                Comment

                • Maxiedge
                  Shankly
                  • Jun 2007
                  • 7769

                  #218
                  I thought Henderson was massively at fault for their second goal. It was quite a simple flick on to Gerrard IMO and he got badly wrong.

                  Comment

                  • Yozza
                    Paisley
                    • Sep 2006
                    • 10247

                    #219



                    After their crushing 5-3 win over Stoke on Sunday, Liverpool's players were spotted heading into London for dinner with their other halves.

                    The Liverpool Christmas party was cancelled, so this dinner could have been a late celebration.



                    What do you mean it could've been anyone? Name me one person who's got a grudge against penguins

                    Batman

                    F*** off!!!

                    Comment

                    • Alex
                      Administrator
                      • Jul 2006
                      • 37058

                      #220
                      Has there ever been a Footballers Christmas party that wasnt cancelled?
                      *Except Michael, who died.

                      Comment

                      • spider-neil
                        Fagan
                        • May 2007
                        • 1180

                        #221
                        Originally posted by Yozza
                        http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/foo...ner-wives.html


                        After their crushing 5-3 win over Stoke on Sunday, Liverpool's players were spotted heading into London for dinner with their other halves.

                        The Liverpool Christmas party was cancelled, so this dinner could have been a late celebration.



                        All that money and they can't afford new jeans

                        Comment

                        • dww
                          humourless curmudgeon
                          • Jul 2006
                          • 29926

                          #222
                          Originally posted by Alex
                          Has there ever been a Footballers Christmas party that wasnt cancelled?
                          Memorably ours in 1998.
                          "The man who never alters his opinion is like standing water, and breeds reptiles of the mind."
                          -- William Blake

                          Comment

                          • meffin
                            Officially the best insider on this forum. Ever!
                            • Jan 2007
                            • 7587

                            #223
                            1. Why were they in London- Stoke away and Villa at home are hardly near London?
                            2. Why was the xmas party cancelled, that's usually for under performing clubs
                            Originally posted by fah-q
                            Didn't someone once see Philip Schofield ****ting into a crisp packet?

                            Comment

                            • Resu
                              Dalglish
                              • Jul 2006
                              • 3908

                              #224
                              Originally posted by meffin
                              1. Why were they in London- Stoke away and Villa at home are hardly near London?
                              2. Why was the xmas party cancelled, that's usually for under performing clubs
                              1. Dont't know
                              2. They players recognized that we have the chance to be at the top this season so they postponed it to stay focused.
                              Blank

                              Comment

                              • Red_Polo
                                Takin' Her Easy
                                • Jul 2006
                                • 35520

                                #225
                                First question is a bit odd isn't it? They're not chained down between matches
                                Like blood on iron

                                Comment

                                Working...