The manager - where are you at?

[EwarWoo]

Ban Rodgers then

If he was on here I wouldn't be entirely opposed to that atm

[tanner]

The tanner/sarb clique powering its way through the forum again

There's no clique here, nothing to see, move on

[dom9]

Not taking sides but an opinion is an opinion and people should be allowed to say what they think,the thing coming across on this site is if your not pro Rodgers you get **** thrown at you,wrong imo,if Rodgers succeeds good for him and egg on the face for those who doubted him,but not being allowed to say what you think and then getting bollocked for it is wrong.You all have a nice day now

I think that it's the relentlessness that people get annoyed with. It's neverending, and it tends to feel like spam. Loads of people have diverging opinions, but some just like to say theirs again and again and again and again.

And that's an opinion too.

[tanner]

If he was on here I wouldn't be entirely opposed to that atm

[tanner]

I think that it's the relentlessness that people get annoyed with. It's neverending, and it tends to feel like spam. Loads of people have diverging opinions, but some just like to say theirs again and again and again and again.

And that's an opinion too.

Says a man with 48000 posts

[Norbs]

And 276

[The_weatherman]

But can't you see that saying "If we lose the next game or play badly, he has to go" might be inflammatory? You're seemingly disregarding our best finish in 20 years and writing off the person that got us there. What, in your opinion would he have had to have done to earn the chance to put things right?

It shouldn't be it's just my opinion. I think that if we lose the next game he should be out, albeit I didn't realise we had two PL games in three day, so I'll retract that, apologize to those I inflamed and state that the next two games should judge his fate.

Last season we had Suarez and Sturridge upfront, we all knew Sturridge is very injury prone so we needed another attacking player. Surely the fact that we have Lambert, Borini and Balotelli is on the manager?

He spent 120 million in the summer and we are weak in every department. We probably need another 50 million at least.

He didn't change anything, move Gerrard or drop him, drop Balotelli, drop Lovren/Johnson etc. He just tried the same things over and over.

In my opinion he hasn't earned the right to drive the club to the ground, which is exactly what I feel he's doing.

[The_weatherman]

I think that it's the relentlessness that people get annoyed with. It's neverending, and it tends to feel like spam. Loads of people have diverging opinions, but some just like to say theirs again and again and again and again.

And that's an opinion too.

Maybe it's just seems that way though? There are fewer posters who vehemently are "against Rodgers" so they will be more active replying various other posters. I think we are about three now pretty vocal, but there are more posters valiantly defending Rodgers' honor.

[dom9]

Says a man with 48000 posts

If anyone on here feels that I am relentlessly repetitive, then I'm more than happy to listen the feedback, provided that examples are given.

[red g]

No idea, one of the many mysteries I have at the minute

Alongside how Glen Johnson gets near a Premier League teamsheet, how Lovren hasnt been permanently dropped

I'd also add why did he drop Lallana after he did well in a few games and why he persists with only 1 up top

lallana, Johnson and Can make no sense at all, I am 100% convinced 2 of those starting week in, week out and Johnson canned would make a huge, huge difference to our side.

Moreno might be prone to the odd mistake but he tries and is a threat offensively to, where Johnsons name on the team sheet is just offensive full stop.

[EwarWoo]

...stuff

You deleted the stupid bit I was going to quote

That's the problem, there's so many things blindingly obvious to different people that maybe it's not so blindingly obvious after all. Why take it to that level of hyperbole?

A bit dirty as I know you retracted it, but you did post it.

[dom9]

Maybe it's just seems that way though? There are fewer posters who vehemently are "against Rodgers" so they will be more active replying various other posters. I think we are about three now pretty vocal, but there are more posters valiantly defending Rodgers' honor.

We're talking about Sarb specifically here. It feels like he posts the same thing more than others because it's true. Simple as that.

[EwarWoo]

If anyone on here feels that I am relentlessly repetitive, then I'm more than happy to listen the feedback, provided that examples are given.

No-ones got the time for that many quotes.

[dom9]

No-ones got the time for that many quotes.

A poor excuse. The pickings should be rich if you're correct in what you are saying.

[EwarWoo]

Whoa, settle down there fella, I didn't say anything. Just bantz etc.