Liverpool vs Crystal Palace - Premier League (18/19 - Game 23)

[labourRed]

Annoying as **** on Goals on Sunday...

Fat Sam was on - they highlighted Palaces second goal where VVD was fouled & were waxing lyrical about what a great set piece it was tactically

No - it was a foul on the defender who was held down thus preventing him from clearing the ball - the goal never should have stood

Instead we had that fat cunt Sam bleating on about how it was great play - the exact **** alehouse tactics what we'd expect from you fat ****

Had to get that off my chest!

[Chris]

Wan Bissaka being better than Trent is an absolutely horrific shout.

[RedReet]

I like AWB, he really impressed me against United last year. Trent though is and will be a much better player, whether it's at FB or in midfield.

[muddym2002]

Wan Bissaka being better than Trent is an absolutely horrific shout.

Its a lot easier for a defender to look good in a team that is set up to defend deep. Definitely a talent but no way is he better then TAA!

[Pablo]

Wan Bissaka being better than Trent is an absolutely horrific shout.

Not like you to exaggerate Chris. We'll see. I like Trent, but I think Wan-Bissaka would be great competition for him.

[Chris]

Not like you to exaggerate Chris. We'll see. I like Trent, but I think Wan-Bissaka would be great competition for him.

It's you calling Wan Bissaka the best right back in the league and saying he'd bench Trent.

He looks a good player, exceptional physical attributes and good defensively though very well protected. Looks totally average with the ball though (and I'm probably being kind there) which is why we just got rid of Clyne. I'll take the right back who's brilliant with the ball, marked the likes of Sane and Ronaldo out of big CL games and is a year younger but it's each to their own.

[Slinky Skills]

I think WB will actually end up a better player. If he can work on his attacking he'd be better I believe.

[Pablo]

It's you calling Wan Bissaka the best right back in the league and saying he'd bench Trent.

He looks a good player, exceptional physical attributes and good defensively though very well protected. Looks totally average with the ball though (and I'm probably being kind there) which is why we just got rid of Clyne. I'll take the right back who's brilliant with the ball, marked the likes of Sane and Ronaldo out of big CL games and is a year younger but it's each to their own.

I think he's right up there with the best RBs in the league at the moment. I think I'm not alone in that opinion either.

I think he's better than Trent defensively, and worse going forward. There's not much in it overall IMO.

I think he'd give Trent a good run for his money at RB, especially in certain games. Look at how Klopp has started Gomez in certain games ahead of Trent, as he's better defensively.

I think Klopp could make him into one hell of a player. It's ok to admit that there are other players who might be at least as good as our own

Also there were a few more reasons Clyne left than him being average going forward, but the fact he is gone means competition at RB is now a priority. We're short there and I reckon this lad would be a great signing.

[Slinky Skills]

I think he's right up there with the best RBs in the league at the moment. I think I'm not alone in that opinion either.



I think he's better than Trent defensively, and worse going forward. There's not much in it overall IMO.



I think he'd give Trent a good run for his money at RB, especially in certain games. Look at how Klopp has started Gomez in certain games ahead of Trent, as he's better defensively.



I think Klopp could make him into one hell of a player. It's ok to admit that there are other players who might be at least as good as our own



Also there were a few more reasons Clyne left than him being average going forward, but the fact he is gone means competition at RB is now a priority. We're short there and I reckon this lad would be a great signing.

[Liverpool]

2 or 3 timez Keita looked to be in and Wan-Bissaka's pace was just too good. I'd give them 40/50 million for him and I think we'd be set at the back for years. Him and Trent together as our right flank would be great.

[frank the tank]

If I was advising Wan Bissaka though then I think he should go somewhere else. He would be a starter every week at arsenal, Man United or Chelsea. He'd probably even start for Man City.

But I dont think he would start ahead of Trent for us. And a young player like him (and Trent) needs to be playing 70-80% of the games

[danperkins]

How good is Aaron Wan-Bissaka by the way. I'd absolutely love to sign that lad. He reminds me of when I first saw Van Dijk play. You could just instantly tell you were looking at a world class player.

I'd pay whatever it took for him to be honest.

really does look a talent but I think Klopp sees Trent as our mainstay.

[baitman]

2 or 3 timez Keita looked to be in and Wan-Bissaka's pace was just too good. I'd give them 40/50 million for him and I think we'd be set at the back for years. Him and Trent together as our right flank would be great.

The obligatory highlights video. The lad looks decent.
Dont think he woud be better than trent and hes too good to sit on the bench.

[ame="https://youtu.be/qlYbsbNqUik"]Aaron Wan-Bissaka ● Crazy Defensive Skills, Interceptions & Passes 2018/2019 - YouTube[/ame]

[Fosterbloke]

Wan-Bissaka at right back, TAA in midfield.

Or Wan-Bissaka alongside VVD...

[Gray]

He’s raw that’s for sure, plays like a pissed wasp