Liverpool vs Burnley - Premier League (19/20 - Game 35)

[Kenneth]

[Maxiedge]

Haha Robbo

Klopp also mentioning the fouls on the keeper.

[Buzzo]

Thats how I feel like after engaging with Kenneth on the forum

[Kenneth]

Petty AF today, Buzzo.

[Fredo]

City scored 15 goals more than us.

[Buzzo]

Petty AF today, Buzzo.

I don’t see how at all.

i thought it was a pen.

You said ‘bollocks’

And ‘desperate’

When I tried to explain why. I take back one comment which was meant in jest but perhaps not received that way.

Anyway, let’s not fall out

[Shaggy]

[ame="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=asM056FLmg0"]YouTube[/ame]

[Kenneth]

I don’t see how at all.

i thought it was a pen.

You said ‘bollocks’

And ‘desperate’

When I tried to explain why. I take back one comment which was meant in jest but perhaps not received that way.

Anyway, let’s not fall out

I misremembered a comment from Roboklopp as being yours. Apologies.

[Norbs]

City scored 15 goals more than us.

Yeah but they've got a bigger pool of first choice to pick from so go full tilt every game

[Buzzo]

YouTube

'we've always been like this'.

I misremembered a comment from Roboklopp as being yours. Apologies.

I've got a lot of love for you guys

[labourRed]

Love it. Players know.

[Exiled_red]

I think the penalty decision is an example one of the failings of the VAR system. The decision was one that was referred to VAR but as the ball stayed in play there wasn't a wait for a decision. For me that was a classic not enough evidence to overturn call, presumably the ref doesn't give it because there is a touch on the ball, the only way that VAR overturns it is if there isn't a touch on the ball. For me that is one where the VAR official should tell the referee that he should look at the pitch side monitor, but that has happened maybe twice this season. I can see why the evidence to overturn is there but it makes a mockery of the game in terms of consistency of decisions.

The reason that Man Utd get more pens than us is probably because of this, the referees award them soft pens which VAR can't overturn (as there isn't enough evidence to do so) where as we hardly get any because there is a higher bar for us, and again there isn't enough evidence on VAR for the no call to be overturned.

[Roboklopp]

I misremembered a comment from Roboklopp as being yours. Apologies.

The comment was a joke though.

[Kenneth]

It's fine, it was a cumulative thing, but wasn't anyway. Moving on.

[Maxiedge]

I think the penalty decision is an example one of the failings of the VAR system. The decision was one that was referred to VAR but as the ball stayed in play there wasn't a wait for a decision. For me that was a classic not enough evidence to overturn call, presumably the ref doesn't give it because there is a touch on the ball, the only way that VAR overturns it is if there isn't a touch on the ball. For me that is one where the VAR official should tell the referee that he should look at the pitch side monitor, but that has happened maybe twice this season. I can see why the evidence to overturn is there but it makes a mockery of the game in terms of consistency of decisions.

The reason that Man Utd get more pens than us is probably because of this, the referees award them soft pens which VAR can't overturn (as there isn't enough evidence to do so) where as we hardly get any because there is a higher bar for us, and again there isn't enough evidence on VAR for the no call to be overturned.

Tim Sherwood said (yes, I know) that he would have kicked the ball out of play and made a song and dance about it so that the VAR decision could be made straight away and more likely to be given. I'm not sure I entirely agree with him but he has a point. The longer the game goes on, the less likely it is to be pulled back, especially if its against the refs judgement.