Originally posted by Kenneth
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Liverpool v Wolves match thread
Collapse
X
-
If it wasn’t for the speed of the tackle by the wolves player, I think it could have been, yes.Originally posted by labourRed View PostIf that was the case, wouldn't it have been a red - dangerous foul play?
1:08
[ame="https://youtu.be/HKA8qZy123w"]Liverpool climb into the top six! | Liverpool 2-0 Wolves | Premier League Highlights - YouTube[/ame]
You can make arguments about him defending himself from a rash challenge etc, but knowing they player, that’s not accidental contact.Trey Nyoni: countdown to stardom-2 years1year0.5 years
Comment
-
Agree.Originally posted by labourRed View PostFor me, Fabinho isn't trying to injure, he's tried to drag the ball away and Lemina has caught him (and come off worse). Although he didn't have a HD slow mo.
But that's not how the ref saw it and for me, he should have sent him off. I think the yellow was a bit of a bottle job.
It should have been Lemina who was booked, sliding in out of cntrol with studs up...
What was Fabinho supposed to do, just gloat in the ****ing air... gravity insists he must put a foot down and unfortunately Lemina has slid right through and under Fabinho.
Manc cunt ref
removing all the weak links makes us stronger
too many gutless players, no beef or desire. pussies everywhere... sack them all.
Comment
-
[QUOTE=labourRed;3832058]For me, Fabinho isn't trying to injure, he's tried to drag the ball away and Lemina has caught him (and come off worse). Although he didn't have a HD slow mo.
But that's not how the ref saw it and for me, he should have sent him off. I think the yellow was a bit of a bottle job.[/QUOTE]
That’s exactly what I thought he was doing too. Not sure what the move is called but yeah you basically do a 360 while dragging the ball around with you.
Me, I’m either planning a holiday or I’m on one.
Comment
-
It was a strange one. I don’t think it was a push as such, and not a penalty, but it was definitively the defender that sent Jota moving towards the other defender. But, it’s all about the movement of Jota’s left leg. Instinctively, he moved his foot towards the ball which ‘fouled’ the defender and it made the space for the shot. How much responsibility lies with the defender and how much Jota is almost indeterminable, so to go against the initial decision of no foul doesn’t seem right at all.Originally posted by Pablo View Post
Nunez's goal should have stood, Jota was shoved in the back and it actually could have been a penalty IMO.Trey Nyoni: countdown to stardom-2 years1year0.5 years
Comment
Comment