Spurs Away thread

[Pablo]

It is the most robbed I think I have ever, ever seen us. A disgrace to be honest.

The VAR only showed the dubious angles to the VAR monitor and completely neglected to show the angle where Curt clearly rolls his foot over the top of the ball. That completely manipulates the referee's opinion.

Diaz's goal is even worse. It looks clearly onside and no one, even Sky see the footage where the lines are drawn? Are you kidding me.

Impossible to accept and so very hard not to conclude it is not just inept, but corrupt.

[Tatterdemalion]

That Diaz decision. clearly onside. the lack of VAR lines is really smelly. And Jamie is right the offside law is bollox.

[Kenneth]

There is absolutely no way anyone here would say ‘maybe a yellow was reasonable’ if our player had been on the receiving end of that challenge. Anyone thinking they would is deluded.

[danperkins]

Still nothing about the offside, shocking. Lads scrambling.

[Mark79]

Kelly Cates saying PGMOL still haven't released official VAR pictures with the lines and this is the longest it's ever taken.

They've ****ed up.

[Tatterdemalion]

There is absolutely no way anyone here would say ‘maybe a yellow was reasonable’ if our player had been on the receiving end of that challenge.

Which one?

[Assassin]

There is absolutely no way anyone here would say ‘maybe a yellow was reasonable’ if our player had been on the receiving end of that challenge.

He played the ball first!!! His foot slid over the top!!! Even a visually impaired person can see that!!!

[Venton]

Kelly Cates saying PGMOL still haven't released official VAR pictures with the lines and this is the longest it's ever taken.

They've ****ed up.

They absolutely have.

[Pablo]

There is absolutely no way anyone here would say ‘maybe a yellow was reasonable’ if our player had been on the receiving end of that challenge.

A yellow was reasonable. His foot clearly rolls over the top of the ball, making it impossible to control. There is no intent. It is very unlucky. A yellow was the correct call.

The VAR footage the monitor showed didn't show that angle to the referee though. Why?

[danperkins]

A yellow was reasonable. His foot clearly rolls over the top of the ball, making it impossible to control. There is no intent. It is very unlucky. A yellow was the correct call.

The VAR footage the monitor showed didn't show that angle to the referee though. Why?

[Scratch]

Jones' red is acceptable, Jota got a soft (none) yellow but then followed it up with a stupid tackle. Spurs never looked like scoring against 9 men, and it took an unfortunate og from Joel to lose us the game. Ref didn't do much wrong really, but VAR has shafted us with the Diaz goal.

[pondus]

Human error in the VAR room. Corruption.

[ric.williams]

There is absolutely no way anyone here would say ‘maybe a yellow was reasonable’ if our player had been on the receiving end of that challenge. Anyone thinking they would is deluded.

its a red. intent is irrelevant.

[Kenneth]

He played the ball first!!! His foot slid over the top!!! Even a visually impaired person can see that!!!

I’ll say it simply, it does not matter. Intent doesn’t matter.

[Kenneth]

A yellow was reasonable. His foot clearly rolls over the top of the ball, making it impossible to control. There is no intent. It is very unlucky. A yellow was the correct call.

The VAR footage the monitor showed didn't show that angle to the referee though. Why?

It ****ing stinks. There wasn’t even time for a review.