Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Spurs Away thread

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by rudedog View Post
    Gary Neville says it wasn’t a red
    he also says Man U need to spend more money every season despite out spending everyone. doesnt make him right

    Comment


      Decisions in order of debatability, imo -
      Diaz offside
      Jota sending off (or rather the first yellow)
      Jones sending off

      PGMOL - significant human error occurred because the Diaz goal was disallowed. VAR failed to intervene. Taking a piss break obviously.
      Really?

      Comment


        Originally posted by Kenneth View Post
        Recall how you felt about that?
        I felt Harry kane went in with his body weight off the ground. A full blooded challenge. It was a reckless challenge.

        Jones tried to beat the player to the ball.

        Comment


          Pmgol you ****ing cunts. Absolute ****ing shambles

          Comment


            Originally posted by kingfunk View Post
            I’m not too bothered about the red cards, it’s var, the pricks literally have 20 tv’s to look at, I could see in play it was onside, are they really that ****ing biased?
            Corrected for you

            Comment


              Originally posted by Fierce View Post
              You can only be on a windup
              I think it’s just because I’m feeling less emotional about the game than many others. People were rightly up in arms about the offside, and cross about the first Jota yellow. But we had the same for Salah shouting at the ref and Robbo jumping with his arm. People got increasingly irrationally angry as it went on.
              Trey Nyoni: countdown to stardom- 2 years 1year 0.5 years

              Comment


                Originally posted by ric.williams View Post
                Seeing as no one can be bothered to read the rules:

                SERIOUS FOUL PLAY

                A tackle or challenge that endangers the safety of an opponent or uses excessive force or brutality must be sanctioned as serious foul play.
                Which is what Andros Townsend was saying, justifying a red.
                Really?

                Comment


                  Why are we debating the red card, it was orange and sometimes they are given. We scored a perfectly fine goal that didn’t stand, and they blame it on a human error. Not possible. Corrupt as **** the prem.

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by ric.williams View Post
                    Seeing as no one can be bothered to read the rules:

                    SERIOUS FOUL PLAY

                    A tackle or challenge that endangers the safety of an opponent or uses excessive force or brutality must be sanctioned as serious foul play.
                    Every tackle you make potentially endangers the safety of an opponent. Excessive force is not an absolute measure, it's a judgment call.
                    I don't think that was excessive force in terms of a tackle, it was normal force but the diversion of the foot off the top of the ball made the final effect more serious.

                    Stop pretending this has strict liability. It's a judgment call.
                    Experimental music, Metropolitan foodstuffs, Mexican wrestler art, London suburbia, wry whimsy, fansy pants flim flam lad

                    Comment


                      Well, there you go. PGMOL have admitted a serious human error.
                      Experimental music, Metropolitan foodstuffs, Mexican wrestler art, London suburbia, wry whimsy, fansy pants flim flam lad

                      Comment


                        [ame]https://twitter.com/neiljonesgoal/status/1708199237266129143[/ame]
                        .
                        .
                        .
                        .

                        Comment


                          Originally posted by Venton View Post
                          Every tackle you make potentially endangers the safety of an opponent. Excessive force is not an absolute measure, it's a judgment call.
                          I don't think that was excessive force in terms of a tackle, it was normal force but the diversion of the foot off the top of the ball made the final effect more serious.

                          Stop pretending this has strict liability. It's a judgment call.
                          if you dont think that challenge could have broken an ankle or leg then i think we should simply agree to disagree?

                          Comment


                            dupe

                            Comment


                              We've been royally ****ed over with that statement. Cunts

                              Comment


                                Should have been 3 points that, which these days is critical.
                                Really?

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X