Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

In a fecking nutshell....

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #76
    Originally posted by DJS View Post
    I know you may feel otherwise, but i just put that down to Pennant not being all that good mate.
    He certainly is not that good, i haven't disguised that fact at all, just pointing out that he has qualities that needs to be exploited, such as great crossing and short passing skills.

    Comment


      #77
      Do you count Arsenal in that, Kaip?

      Comment


        #78
        Originally posted by fredo View Post
        He certainly is not that good, i haven't disguised that fact at all, just pointing out that he has qualities that needs to be exploited, such as great crossing and short passing skills.
        He doesnt seem to have the mentality though, no belief, no confidence, and little evidence of much pace, either.

        No crossing ability or passing skills can help, if the lad's head isnt right.

        Comment


          #79
          Originally posted by DJS View Post
          Do you count Arsenal in that, Kaip?
          Reyes
          Jeffers
          R. Wright

          Yes, even Arsenal waste money.
          Originally posted by Gordon Brown
          (1995)
          "A weak currency is the sign of a weak economy,which is the sign of a weak government"

          Comment


            #80
            Originally posted by Red Chilli View Post
            Reyes
            Jeffers
            R. Wright

            Yes, even Arsenal waste money.
            I wouldnt mind the wasting of money if, somewhere along the line, we'd brought in the players who'd won us two doubles (as well as got us challenging for the title every season) in the last 10 years...

            Comment


              #81
              Originally posted by DJS View Post
              Do you count Arsenal in that, Kaip?
              Arsenal has a different policy. They just go out and buy the best young talent there is around and try to develop them afterwards. They are investing in potential and rely on their scouting network to 'spot' a talent, much like Rafa's scouts.

              The difference is (as Rafa pointed out in one of his recent pre match post conferences), they can afford to put more money. Walcott should have been ours if we decided to go for that extra 3 or 4 million pounds. That could well be true for many of Arsenal's bright youngsters, as we surely were after most of them.

              Comment


                #82
                Originally posted by DJS View Post
                Do you count Arsenal in that, Kaip?


                Yep.............does franny jeffers ring a bell
                All hat and no cattle

                Comment


                  #83
                  Originally posted by DJS View Post
                  You're using that as a method to justify not trying it.

                  I'm using 17 years without a title and a 16 point gap as a suggestion of why we should try it.
                  Hmm maybe.

                  Actually what I'm saying is that it's a ****ing boring discussion, full of imponderables and half-arsed opinions from people who are often no doubt good and well-meaning but who sadly know little or nothing about professional football or running a club or managing a squad...

                  I include myself obviously and there may be the odd exception to the rule who contributes to this forum.

                  I'll try to leave you all to get on with it. No offence meant.

                  .
                  Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



                  May the Lord bless this post.

                  Comment


                    #84
                    Originally posted by DJS View Post
                    He doesnt seem to have the mentality though, no belief, no confidence, and little evidence of much pace, either.

                    No crossing ability or passing skills can help, if the lad's head isnt right.
                    That's my point mate.

                    Comment


                      #85
                      Originally posted by fredo View Post
                      Arsenal has a different policy. They just go out and buy the best young talent there is around and try to develop them afterwards. They are investing in potential and rely on their scouting network to 'spot' a talent, much like Rafa's scouts.

                      The difference is (as Rafa pointed out in one of his recent pre match post conferences), they can afford to put more money. Walcott should have been ours if we decided to go for that extra 3 or 4 million pounds. That could well be true for many of Arsenal's bright youngsters, as we surely were after most of them.
                      Why can Arsenal afford to put more money in than us?

                      Comment


                        #86
                        Originally posted by DJS View Post
                        I wouldnt mind the wasting of money if, somewhere along the line, we'd brought in the players who'd won us two doubles (as well as got us challenging for the title every season) in the last 10 years...
                        What's you're point? They weren't a waste of money because the rest of the team was successsful?

                        That's nonsense, if you're disputing that these 3 were a waste of money then you've lost it.
                        Originally posted by Gordon Brown
                        (1995)
                        "A weak currency is the sign of a weak economy,which is the sign of a weak government"

                        Comment


                          #87
                          Originally posted by Kaip View Post
                          Yep.............does franny jeffers ring a bell
                          Not disputing the wasting money thing, of course every club does. As i said before though, i could swallow it easier if they'd also won 2 doubles and challenged for the title every year along the way.

                          However, my question was more to do with you saying some clubs can afford to waste it more than others.

                          Can Arsenal 'afford' to waste money any more than we can?

                          Comment


                            #88
                            Originally posted by Neil Young View Post
                            Hmm maybe.

                            Actually what I'm saying is that it's a ****ing boring discussion, full of imponderables and half-arsed opinions from people who are often no doubt good and well-meaning but who sadly know little or nothing about professional football or running a club or managing a squad...

                            I include myself obviously and there may be the odd exception to the rule who contributes to this forum.

                            I'll try to leave you all to get on with it. No offence meant.

                            Obviously you didn't bracket me with all these ****s.

                            Comment


                              #89
                              Originally posted by Red Chilli View Post
                              What's you're point? They weren't a waste of money because the rest of the team was successsful?

                              That's nonsense, if you're disputing that these 3 were a waste of money then you've lost it.
                              No, i'm saying that despite wasting money, they were still able to buy brilliant players who brought them lots of success.

                              We only manage the first half of that.

                              Comment


                                #90
                                Originally posted by fredo View Post
                                Obviously you didn't bracket me with all these ****s.

                                Heaven forfend, mon vieux.
                                .
                                Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



                                May the Lord bless this post.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X