Can we spend all our money on Laporte?
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
-
Was muß, das muß. -
I'd effectively say that's his LFC career over and done with, how sad.
Guess Klopp has been less than impressed with him.
Hope you enjoyed your time in the Liverpool country Sakho, you will be missed. You and your black gloves.
Klopp on LFC vs MUFC (March 9th 2016) - "This is why I love football. This is why we watched it when we were young. I can still not have enough of it."
Always, keep your face to the sun, and shadows will fall behind you.Comment
-
If his LFC career is over because the fall out with Klopp is so bad the surely we would be selling him rather than loaning him out?The only gracious way to accept an insult is to ignore it; if you can't ignore it, top it; if you can't top it, laugh at it; if you can't laugh at it, it's probably deserved.Comment
-
A real shame. ��Comment
-
Maybe he refused. Will go out on loan for a season to see if things cool but thinks he has a future here.
We've seen before players expectations don't always match up with reality (Borini)Comment
-
Originally posted by cream View Post
He might be the former, but he's certainly not the latter. In fact, he's superlative with a football.Originally posted by tanner View Post
I don't think it's over because ..Originally posted by Slinky Skills View Post
Exactly. If he was done at Liverpool we'd be cashing in on him well before the start of the season and probably on his jaunt back from USA. And especially not leaking it with two weeks before the transfer window slams shut.Originally posted by Exiled_red View Post
If he does go on loan I really hope we have a replacement lined up and it's not Lucas.Last edited by Muddled; 23-08-16, 08:04 AM.Comment
-
-
I'm not sure there's a precedent there. The club loaned out Balotelli because nobody would buy him, loaned out Smicer until the end of his contract, Aquilani time after time and there are other examples too. It might be the only way they can get him out the door - his professional reputation isn't exactly high just now.Originally posted by Muddled View Post
He might be the former, but he's certainly not the latter. In fact, he's superlative with a football.
I don't think it's over because ..
Exactly. If he was done at Liverpool we'd be cashing in on him well before the start of the season and probably on his jaunt back from USA. And especially not leaking it with two weeks before the transfer window slams shut.
If he does go on loan I really hope we have a replacement lined up and it's not Lucas.Comment
-
This is all getting a bit ridiculous. Wont sign a left back, wont sign an established midfielder, bombing out sakho because we've got ragnar.... the results better back all of this up.Comment
-
WrongOriginally posted by Daniel 7 View PostJames Philip Milner Fanclub #1
Curtis Julian Jones Fanclub #1Comment
-
I thought he went on loan and then joined them? You get the point thoughOriginally posted by Rich View PostComment
-
I'd like to think Sakho's stock is still relatively high, but sure, it's not where it could be. I suppose it's how you interpret the loaning of Sakho. It's either you're off on loan as a lesson with the opportunity of a second chance or Sakho's off and there is nobody interested.Originally posted by Daniel 7 View Post
I think it's the timing for me that makes me think it's the former.Comment
-
Shame about Sakho though, he's our best centrehalf by some distance, even if he does have the odd clanger in him.
I suspect we can get a loan fee for him though.James Philip Milner Fanclub #1
Curtis Julian Jones Fanclub #1Comment
-
If he's burned his bridges, then selling him now looks desperate, and we may get derisory offers, so i could see why Klopp would/will play it all down.
He's young, talented, loan him out and get our money back. Maybe ?Comment
-
It may explain why Lucas is still around, and we rejected Galatasary's offer at the last minute.Comment
Comment