Originally posted by Vermilion
View Post
Benteke is so far down the list of problems with our attacking play. Obviously we could do better with a striker who is a better fit, but he's scoring >.5 non-pen goals per 90 (so a little better than 1-in-2) and up to .6 non-pen goals + assists per 90. Those are both second-best in the side behind Sturridge, and both are respectable rates for a striker on a side challenging for top four. The problem is that Coutinho doesn't really score (or even assist) enough, Lallana is pretty much a non-factor there, Firmino hasn't done much yet, there's not much end product from midfield, and then every other attacker is hurt. So when Sturridge is out, the goals come from Benteke or nowhere.
You could say that this is because all of those players just don't have end product (and certainly I think they lack in that area), or that that's somehow Benteke's fault too even though they weren't really goal threats when we played Origi or Firmino or Ings up top either (a more nuanced debate could be had there), but I still think that the biggest problem with our attacking play is a structural weakness that's been around a long time but covered up because Sturridge/Suarez (and occasionally Sterling and Coutinho) would just conjure something up anyway. As we improve that our attacking patterns under Klopp, which will take time, I expect everyone to score more. Including Benteke. But that he's been 1-in-2 even though he's not really integrated properly (which he may or may not do in the future) and is playing in a side that clearly is dysfunctional in attack at a fundamental level is encouraging to me. He's probably not the long-term fix, but I'm still perplexed at how eager a lot of people are to see him sold.



Comment