OUT!!!!!!! Bye bye Hughes.
-
Thanks very much for being ‘This Mornings’ Farmer’ -
34-2
Comment
-
Now watch em moan about that one...Originally posted by ShaggyAlonso View Post
Must have touched the ground that catch, but hey...that's cricket. 
This could be over very quickly at this rate and with this umpiring.
Comment
-
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/cric...nd/8157281.stm1203: Aus 34-2 Flintoff sent down another probing delivery outside left-hander Hughes' off stump and the 20-year-old snicked a fine edge into the hands of Andrew Strauss at first slip. England are jubilant - but Hughes is told to stand his ground by his stone-faced captain, who is adamant the ball did not carry into the England skipper's hands. Umpire Rudi Koertzen looks towards Billy Doctrove at square leg for adjudication - and the West Indian nods, no need to go to Nigel Llong upstairs. However, TV replays paint a different picture - it looks as if the ball made contact with grass before Strauss slipped his fingers underneath the leather... Oh my. New man Mike Hussey leaves a ball which flirts with his off stump.Another MASSIVE game
Comment
-
Waaaaaaaaaaahooooooooo 4 down now! Could be 1-0 by tonight.
Thanks very much for being ‘This Mornings’ Farmer’Comment
-
Crucial to regaining the ashes this game, with Australia only needing to tie to retain them, it is imo imperative that the side that takes the lead in the series is England.
If the Aussies were to go one up then it would have been difficult if not near impossible to overhaul them enough to win the series.
Ohhh ya beauty, lovely ball by Swan, sweet...OUT!!!!Last edited by Vermilion; 19-07-09, 03:00 PM.Comment
-
Australia are worse than England..
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post.Comment
-
-
Loving this
Thanks very much for being ‘This Mornings’ Farmer’Comment
-
I prefer the way I said it.Originally posted by Vermilion View Post No, england are just better than australia. 
Who are you?.
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post.Comment
-
REDrascal I think.Thanks very much for being ‘This Mornings’ Farmer’Comment
-
Ah, thanks.
And thanks for not making a crack about Alzheimer's.
.
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post.Comment
-
Shhh, don't tell anyone, but up until 20mins ago i was your friendly neighbourhood REDrascal.Originally posted by Neil Young View PostI prefer the way I said it.
Who are you?
Was time for a change, mid life crisis i think.
This title's for life though.
Last edited by Vermilion; 19-07-09, 03:07 PM.Comment
-
-
Except when he's off his face.Originally posted by Vermilion View Post Shaggy doesn't miss a trick..
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post.Comment
Comment