Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The Ashes thread

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    ****ing get in

    Comment


      Originally posted by ShaggyAlonso View Post
      What a buzz

      Six 'bowled' in the innings, love it! Love to see the timberrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr!
      It's a great sound

      Comment


        I wonder if Freddie drunk yet?

        Comment


          Originally posted by Reece View Post
          I wonder if Freddie drunk yet?
          Are you?
          Sack swinging like Dub-D40 on a door hinge

          Comment


            No just euphoric

            Comment


              Heroic from freddie - aussies on fox are bitter as **** but **** em super freddie flintoff is on the march whast a way to walk from lords - the (aussie) wife is gutted ut ha ha - i am blitzed on vin rouge

              supef super fred supoer freddir flintoff
              cunt

              Comment


                Originally posted by Gerrard View Post
                Heroic from freddie - aussies on fox are bitter as **** but **** em super freddie flintoff is on the march whast a way to walk from lords - the (aussie) wife is gutted ut ha ha - i am blitzed on vin rouge

                supef super fred supoer freddir flintoff


                WTF have they got to be bitter about FFS, they got outplayed from ball one.
                Thanks very much for being ‘This Mornings’ Farmer’

                Comment


                  Excellent, just brilliant, all done and dusted and my nails still intact, just what we needed.

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by ShaggyAlonso View Post


                    WTF have they got to be bitter about FFS, they got outplayed from ball one.
                    Maybe they're bitter about the fact their captain is a hypocrite.

                    From The Times
                    July 20, 2009

                    Ricky Ponting condemned by own actions

                    Simon Barnes


                    Piece of advice for all professional athletes: never talk about the spirit of the game. It is a statistical certainty - sport being sport and athletes being athletes - that before the week is out you'll be found wanting it. To invoke the spirit of the game - any game - is to stand before the world as a hypocrite.

                    Ricky Ponting, the captain of Australia, has perpetuated just such a howler. Last week he suggested that England, by slowing down the game with such pathetic devices as sending on the twelfth man and the physio to take out unneeded gloves and to tend non-existent injuries, were violating the spirit of the game.

                    It opens the door to a fascinating philosophical discussion. What do we mean by the word spirit? What do we mean by the word game? What do we mean by the word word? Just some of the questions that Ponting will not be debating tonight. He has always given the impression of a man who has escaped the tyranny of abstract thought.

                    He has also, like many athletes, let himself off the need for philosophical and moral consistency. You can call that hypocrisy if you like. He accused England of slowing down the game in Cardiff; so what did he do when England were on the charge at Lord's? Why, he slowed down the game, to little more than 13 overs an hour, with all those field changes and committee meetings designed not to improve Australia's performance but to disrupt England's.

                    When he was out in the first innings, he departed with behaviour that bordered on dissent. Later, one of his players, Nathan Hauritz, claimed - with total certainty - a catch. The appeal went to a replay that seemed to show quite clearly that it was no such thing.

                    Let us take the generous line and assume that all this appealing was done in good faith, but Ponting's response was not in accordance with what some people would consider the spirit of the game.

                    The thing with cricketers, the thing with all athletes, is that the primary use of “the spirit of the game” is as a cudgel to belabour the opposition, rather than a code to keep yourself. Our team are frightfully hard-nosed and tough-minded, but when the opponents act the same way, everybody gets a fit of the vapours and says they are betraying the SOTG.

                    Most modern cricketers won't walk. Our chief cricket correspondent will give you the hardest of the arguments, not to mention the hardest of Paddington Bear stares, should you attempt to argue otherwise. This is the spirit of the modern game; so OK, fine, we must accept that. But many - admittedly not Athers - are incensed when an opponent fails to walk. He is a rotten cheat and when he makes his century, you refuse to clap. In short, you are using the SOTG not as a thing of real moral meaning but as a piece of gamesmanship.

                    The truth of the matter is that every game has two spirits. First, there is the SOTG as an imprecise moral concept, a device you can use for a spot of self-righteousness, a thing used with self-certainty and complete vagueness by spectators and commentators.

                    But then there is the spirit of the game as it is actually played, a much tougher and more meaningful thing altogether. We spectators want to see sport played with a near-impossible mixture of hardness and decency, with total commitment and perfect chivalry.

                    We accept the hard-nosed stuff; that's modern sport. But when we find hypocrisy we put a clothes peg on our nose.

                    http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/spo...cle6719629.ece
                    .
                    Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



                    May the Lord bless this post.

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by Neil Young View Post
                      Maybe they're bitter about the fact their captain is a hypocrite.




















                      waits patiently for harv to make an appearance

                      Comment


                        Andy Flower just said that there is no room for complacency in the England team. I take this as a hint that Pietersen will be dropped.
                        "The man who never alters his opinion is like standing water, and breeds reptiles of the mind."
                        -- William Blake

                        Comment



                          "I want to give a special mention to Andrew Flintoff" says Andy Strauss, "he was magnificent throughout." The crowd cheers in agreement, and Fred modestly picks at a fingernail. Man of the match is, unsurprisingly, England Rudi Koertzen Andy Flintoff.

                          Well, the post-match awards are taking place. "We were outplayed right through the course of the game" says Ricky Ponting, "from the first ball to the last." Australia start a three-day game against Northamptonshire on Friday, when they will start their counter-attack. It's coming people. They will not be so easily beaten again in this series. "Do you sense Australia didn't get the rub of the green in this game?" asks Atherton, "it's irrelevant now, we've lost the game and we can't complain." That was well said by him, and he grins as he gets a round of applause from the crowd.
                          "The man who never alters his opinion is like standing water, and breeds reptiles of the mind."
                          -- William Blake

                          Comment


                            Yeah, punter took it well for a change, though let's wait to see if he changes his story in the mornings papers.

                            Great knock from Johnson to salvage at least a little pride, but Freddie and Swann were just magnificent.

                            Comment


                              The Guardian are flogging this on their site:



                              .
                              Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



                              May the Lord bless this post.

                              Comment


                                Originally posted by dww View Post
                                Andy Flower just said that there is no room for complacency in the England team. I take this as a hint that Pietersen will be dropped.
                                Hmmmn, very doubtful that....more that Flower is saying we cannot think that because we have one a test, we have won the series, and that the aussies could still win the next three...

                                But if Pietersen is still getting grief from his achilles, then maybe a rest would be beneficial...same with Freddie and his knee...altho with 10 days (i think) till the next test, i expect both players to be ok.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X