Originally posted by Neil Young
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
The Official Olympic Thread
Collapse
X
-
Bit misleading though. Percentage wise Id guess its a massive increase. But I would also assume its not an incredibly popular sport either. Compared to most other sports anyway. Its hardly accessible to everyone is it? Not in the way football or athletics is.Originally posted by Neil Young View PostOk. Let's look at which sports have seen a rise in participation since lottery funding...
Can you guess where this is heading?*Except Michael, who died.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Kenneth View PostYou banging on about bikes even more?
What, cycling is inaccessible?Originally posted by Alex View PostBit misleading though. Percentage wise Id guess its a massive increase. But I would also assume its not an incredibly popular sport either. Compared to most other sports anyway. Its hardly accessible to everyone is it? Not in the way football or athletics is.
Or do you think I'm tilting at yachting or equestrianism?
Cycling has been a major success story over the last few years, both in terms of elite success of course, but also participation. It's not just a sport, it's also a means of transport and the two elements feed each other.
Also the more cyclists there are on the road, then the safer it gets. It's all-round win.
But I can now see that all this is entirely negated since cyclists are the only ones who should have paid for the Olympic velodrome or something..
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post.
Comment
-
Well of course kids will take up cycling. It's riding bikes. Kids like toys and always will.Originally posted by CJ View Postnoooo
i agree with Redhots post in the library on the matter. i suppose there is an argument (to be had in the library) on whether it would be better to spread more of the funding at the grass roots of ANY sport rather than concentrating it at the elite end. but that is for the library i would imagine,
for this thread you have to hope that the success of the games and the fact it is here will mean lots of youngsters (and those older) will take up sport and hopefully it will help some people at the disadvantaged end of our country to improve their situation in life
Trey Nyoni: countdown to stardom-2 years1year0.5 years
Comment
-
I was more referring to Track cycling. Just because you have a car doesn't make you a race driver.Originally posted by Neil Young View Post
What, cycling is inaccessible?
Or do you think I'm tilting at yachting or equestrianism?
Cycling has been a major success story over the last few years, both in terms of elite success of course, but also participation. It's not just a sport, it's also a means of transport and the two elements feed each other.
Also the more cyclists there are on the road, then the safer it gets. It's all-round win.
But I can now see that all this is entirely negated since cyclists are the only ones who should have paid for the Olympic velodrome or something.
The more cyclists on the road the better though.
Yachting or Equestrian are possibly two of the most limited participation sports you could get
*Except Michael, who died.
Comment
-
Like I say all the different aspects feed each other, especially track and road.Originally posted by Alex View PostI was more referring to Track cycling. Just because you have a car doesn't make you a race driver.
The more cyclists on the road the better though.
Yachting or Equestrian are possibly two of the most limited participation sports you could get
But I fear I may be in danger of getting a little close to running the risk of taking a chance on boring people so I'm going to stop this and revel in triathlon gold instead.
Gold!
.
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post.
Comment




Comment