Dear Guest
Thank you for visiting! est189 will soon be closing its doors (do forums have doors?) please visit the following thread - (to wail & cry perhaps?)
https://www.est1892.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?p=4002484#post4002484
Thanjk you.
Paul.S
"You are out of control. That is totally uncool.... You're a hater and you are totally unattractive................... on the inside..... we are in America "
We are in Amerrica..??????? Give me a break
...which is precisely what her outburst gave to Stosur.
. Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
Yeah she is really popular around here. I guess because she is the only decent tennis player to have come from australia since hewitt was good.
Nothing to do with being an Aussie for me. Her forehand is wonderful, the spin she can put into a ball is on par with the men and when her serve is on, it's a joy to watch. She's one player who can dominate the tour if she maintains consistency, the potential to win multiple slams is there.
90% of women's tennis is filled with passive baseliners or brainless ball bashers, so how is an aggressive player, who likes to come into the net and hits winners like there's no tomorrow, dull?
90% of women's tennis is filled with passive baseliners or brainless ball bashers, so how is an aggressive player, who likes to come into the net and hits winners like there's no tomorrow, dull?
90% of women's tennis is filled with passive baseliners or brainless ball bashers, so how is an aggressive player, who likes to come into the net and hits winners like there's no tomorrow, dull?
Nah, there are some waaayyyy fitter ones than her I enjoy watching much more
Middle age is a terrible thing.
. Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
Comment