Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Tour de France

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #16
    Hedgehog, thank you for your input.
    .
    Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



    May the Lord bless this post.

    Comment


      #17
      Originally posted by foresterbloke View Post
      Where is Cavendish, Gerrans or Goss?
      Liege?

      Well, they're not going to win it, are they?
      .
      Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



      May the Lord bless this post.

      Comment


        #18
        Felching ≠ Gerbilling

        Comment


          #19
          Originally posted by Neil Young View Post
          Liege?

          Well, they're not going to win it, are they?
          Neither is Samuel Sanchez to be fair. He's a one stage wonder at best.
          Was muß, das muß.

          Comment


            #20
            I think that's a bit harsh. He won the KoM last year, didn't he? And his time trialling isn't as bad as someone like Schleck's. But yes, he's very much an outsider.

            Goss could win green. He's said he's targeting it and I don't think Cavendish will bother with intermediate sprints and may well not make it to Paris.

            Gerrans is a possible stage winner but nothing more. And I don't like him for some reason. I don't like Goss that much either. But it's probably just anti-Australian prejudice.

            Porte's good but of course he'll be riding for Wiggins.

            I did wonder if Cobo is a challenger but opinion seems to be that he's more focused on defending his Vuelta title.
            .
            Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



            May the Lord bless this post.

            Comment


              #21
              Originally posted by Neil Young View Post
              Among the French, Rolland and Pinot look good. But neither will win so yet another year of bitter disappointment for Nigey the Frog.
              Haha, I couldn't give a French's rat's arse.
              Are we winning?

              Comment


                #22
                Nige, I don't know what's sadder: the fact you're lying to me or the fact you're lying to yourself.
                .
                Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



                May the Lord bless this post.

                Comment


                  #23
                  Originally posted by Neil Young View Post
                  Nige, I don't know what's sadder: the fact you're lying to me or the fact you're lying to yourself.


                  I liked Contador.
                  Are we winning?

                  Comment


                    #24
                    Yes, but it's probably more interesting without him.
                    .
                    Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



                    May the Lord bless this post.

                    Comment


                      #25
                      Originally posted by NigelLG View Post


                      I like cock.
                      Was muß, das muß.

                      Comment


                        #26
                        Originally posted by foresterbloke View Post
                        I like your cock
                        Are we winning?

                        Comment


                          #27
                          I'm sure yours is lovely mate. Do you wear Lycra to show it off without getting naked?
                          Was muß, das muß.

                          Comment


                            #28
                            Originally posted by foresterbloke View Post
                            I'm sure yours is lovely mate. Do you wear Lycra to show it off without getting naked?
                            I don't ride bikes unfortunately. Do you want to carry on with this conversation, or cock fight, or should we talk about the tour?
                            Are we winning?

                            Comment


                              #29
                              Originally posted by NigelLG View Post
                              I don't ride bikes unfortunately. Do you want to carry on with this conversation, or cock fight, or should we talk about the tour?
                              I didn't mention riding bikes. Just Lycra

                              Seriously though, would love to see Contador back.
                              Was muß, das muß.

                              Comment


                                #30
                                Good result for Wiggins yesterday, pretty much ideal.

                                Cancellara is back to being amazing.
                                .
                                Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



                                May the Lord bless this post.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X