Hedgehog, thank you for your input.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Tour de France
Collapse
X
-
.
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post.
-
Liege?Originally posted by foresterbloke View PostWhere is Cavendish, Gerrans or Goss?
Well, they're not going to win it, are they?.
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post.
Comment
-
I think that's a bit harsh. He won the KoM last year, didn't he? And his time trialling isn't as bad as someone like Schleck's. But yes, he's very much an outsider.
Goss could win green. He's said he's targeting it and I don't think Cavendish will bother with intermediate sprints and may well not make it to Paris.
Gerrans is a possible stage winner but nothing more. And I don't like him for some reason. I don't like Goss that much either. But it's probably just anti-Australian prejudice.
Porte's good but of course he'll be riding for Wiggins.
I did wonder if Cobo is a challenger but opinion seems to be that he's more focused on defending his Vuelta title..
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post.
Comment
-
Nige, I don't know what's sadder: the fact you're lying to me or the fact you're lying to yourself..
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post.
Comment
-
Yes, but it's probably more interesting without him..
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post.
Comment
-
Good result for Wiggins yesterday, pretty much ideal.
Cancellara is back to being amazing.
.
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post.
Comment
Comment