Originally posted by Assassin
View Post
Fixed 
-
His former wife might have a lot to say as well but I'm pretty certain that Armstrong has bought her silence.Are we winning?Comment
-
I'm serious, he seems to have psychopathic tendencies..
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post.Comment
-
-
That's daft, you have no way of ruling out other plausible explanations for her behaviour.Originally posted by Nigey View Post
I know it seems not to apply on the internet but, in the real world that most of us live in, actions have consequences.
Armstrong is the guilty person here, there's no need to traduce others who are at best peripheral to the issues..
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post.Comment
-
I'm not ruling anything, just suggesting something. I'm pretty sure she would be privy to a lot of information and maybe was the reason for their breakup.Originally posted by Neil Young View Post
Yes it's speculation but I'm not using the media to spread it. So, that's not daft at all.
Are we winning?Comment
-
It's just blind guessing though unless you have some narrative that makes it at least as plausible as the myriad other explanations.
It adds nothing and merely distracts from the central issue, and if anything spreads the blame from the main culprit identified so far..
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post.Comment
-
I'm quite interested to see which way he'll go with this as since he's been stripped of his titles etc.. he's neither admitted guilt nor denied it.
Going on past performance you'd expect a denial really or a "I've said I'll I am going to say on this" type of response.Comment
-
Id love it (not really) if he went on and tried to talk about his art or something. Totally try and change the narrative.*Except Michael, who died.Comment
-
Originally posted by Neil Young View Post
He will produce tears 11 minutes and 22 seconds in to the interview. A tissue will be on standby.Trey Nyoni: countdown to stardom-2 years1year0.5 yearsComment
-
The tears won't be for him, they'll be for his family
Thanks very much for being ‘This Mornings’ Farmer’Comment
-
Originally posted by rcasemore View Post
It's hard to know though. His life has imploded to the point where he may now want to pursue another line entirely.
I expect there'll be a limited confession of wrongdoing. It will be interesting to see how he justifies it. The obvious course of action is 'everyone was at it' and 'everyone knew how it worked' but for some reason I don't think that will be the line. It has a large element of truth to it - it wasn't everyone but it was endemic and systematic, it was enabled and even sometimes instigated by the team managers, it was wilfully ignored by the authorities who chose to turn a blind eye.
But I can't see how that would achieve what has to be his objective - some sort of redemption or forgiveness, by the public and/or the sporting authorities. You never know, maybe he'll announce he is going to co-operate fully. I wouldn't be surprised if he says it but that doesn't mean he'll really do it.
Whatever happens, I think it will be purely about what he wants to achieve for himself and that's a pity. Maybe eventually he'll think about the damage he's done but it's too soon for that now..
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post.Comment
-
Originally posted by Kenneth View Post
He will produce tears 11 minutes and 22 seconds in to the interview. A tissue will be on standby.
Whatever turns you on I suppose.
What, you mean you're upset for his family or that's why he'll be crying?Originally posted by Shaggy View PostThe tears won't be for him, they'll be for his family.
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post.Comment
-
That's what he'll say he's crying about.Thanks very much for being ‘This Mornings’ Farmer’Comment
-
I see. Here come the waterworks etc.
.
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post.Comment
Comment