Dear Guest
Thank you for visiting! est189 will soon be closing its doors (do forums have doors?) please visit the following thread - (to wail & cry perhaps?)
https://www.est1892.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?p=4002484#post4002484
Thanjk you.
Paul.S
Not so sure about that Neil. If the booking was given by the ref for excessive celebrating, which a yellow card is sufficient. If the FA look at as crowd encitement there are not undermining the ref
I was asking the question rather than making a point.
. Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
1. Emmanuel Adebayor knocked a steward unconscious
At least that's what we thought when we read various headlines over the weekend. In reality, of course, he did nothing of the sort. And while Adebayor's goal celebration was moronic and egomaniacal, the fact that he alone has been blamed for the resulting disorder is a reflection of the entirely inappropriate amount of moral power that has been given to the modern football fan. They are allowed to abuse footballers in as disgusting a manner as they please, and yet those players are not permitted to respond in even the most polite of terms.
The envy of supporters has dehumanised footballers, as it does in all areas of celebrity. Just as tabloid gossip columns – and we read them all, every day – revel in and poke fun at celebrity break-ups, as if the subjects are somehow immune to the crushing dejection of heartbreak, so fans seem to think that, just because a footballer earns £xxx,000 per week, they should have the capacity to laugh off hateful chants about incest, or their wife's sexual proclivities, or suggestions that they did not father their children. What absolute horse pucky. If fans give it, they should be able to take it. It's that simple, yet instead they hide risibly under the umbrella of "We pay at the gate, therefore we can do what we want". Yes, because that really applies in other consumer industries.
("Five things we learned from the Premier League this weekend", TheSportBlog, guardian.co.uk)
1. Emmanuel Adebayor knocked a steward unconscious
At least that's what we thought when we read various headlines over the weekend. In reality, of course, he did nothing of the sort. And while Adebayor's goal celebration was moronic and egomaniacal, the fact that he alone has been blamed for the resulting disorder is a reflection of the entirely inappropriate amount of moral power that has been given to the modern football fan. They are allowed to abuse footballers in as disgusting a manner as they please, and yet those players are not permitted to respond in even the most polite of terms.
The envy of supporters has dehumanised footballers, as it does in all areas of celebrity. Just as tabloid gossip columns – and we read them all, every day – revel in and poke fun at celebrity break-ups, as if the subjects are somehow immune to the crushing dejection of heartbreak, so fans seem to think that, just because a footballer earns £xxx,000 per week, they should have the capacity to laugh off hateful chants about incest, or their wife's sexual proclivities, or suggestions that they did not father their children. What absolute horse pucky. If fans give it, they should be able to take it. It's that simple, yet instead they hide risibly under the umbrella of "We pay at the gate, therefore we can do what we want". Yes, because that really applies in other consumer industries.
("Five things we learned from the Premier League this weekend", TheSportBlog, guardian.co.uk)
If it were actually a fact, rather than a convenient and contrived statement allowing a rant about society.
Trey Nyoni: countdown to stardom- 2 years1year 0.5 years
I was trying answer, but it looks like it might have come across as a point
No, not at all. I was just clarifying my post.
Enough of all this 'after you, Claude' stuff.
. Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
Comment