Stoke's Matthew Etherington under pressure to settle huge gambling debts

[saj]

if that is the string you were talking about, show me the string, then I shall measure it and tell one of its length, then this whole thread of how long a string is can die.

Nah it's a long story and I thought you were referring to - I once threw a fit on a thread when I didn't know better. And I think it was 'Lee' who said "I can see your tampon string from here mate "

[saj]

So as there is no medicine that can cure AIDS, does that mean it doesn't class as an illness?

Perhaps the medicine or cure that can supress the urge to gamble that the mind has is just yet to be found, as is a cure for Aids, or Cancer??

No it is an illness - you need to read my other posts after that.

[dom9]

back at you.

Do you have an opinion on every subject where you're knowledge 'isn't great' even though you have admitted you have hardly any knowledge on the subject matter of addiction to gambling but yet you have expressed your opinion many times? You're basically implying that you can say your opinion but I can't?

Do you ever post in the Liverpool FC chat section of this? If so, why? Because given your theory that you should only post on matters "where you're knowledge is great", nobody should theoretically speaking (according to you) post anything to do with who Rafa should play, what tactics should be used etc etc as what footballing knowledge do we have given the fact no member of this site works or has worked for LFC in some form of coaching capacity as a fulltime profession? The answer is not much as we only watch games.

Knowledge is not quantifiable. Asking someone how much knowledge they have on a subject is like asking someone how long a piece of string is. Even if you only have a tiny bit of knowledge, it can be enough for you to form an opinion.

I'm not an expert on the subject in hand, but I have more experience it in than you do, so I pointed out quite rightly, that you were taking ****e. It's not personal, just an observation based upon tangible experience. I have pointed out the flaws in your argument, but you have chosen to ignore those. I asked your opinion on Behaviourism, but this was not responded to. You have taken exception to one post, which is fair enough, and ignored the content of the others.

I don't tend to post much in the LFC section no. For every Saj in this thread, there are 50 in there. Everyone talks ****e there, particularly because no-one is posession of the full facts, so it's all conjecture, which results in arguing.

By the way, if knowledge isn't quantifiable, what are qualifications for? Do you have any qualifications? I'm sure you must have done some GCSEs at least. Didn't you say you had a degree in that thread in which you got slaughtered by Shaggy? Did those courses / exams test your knowledge of the subject matter?

Do you ever think about what you are saying? You don't appear to.

[Baracus]

I'm not an expert on the subject in hand, but I have more experience it in than you do, .

what a cock, sorry prof.dom

I believe saj took one 'ell of a ribbing for claiming that is 5-a-side football knowledge combined with his extensive education history and not being fed with a silver spoon and matt shark recently got owned. do people not learn

http://imagecache2.allposters.com/images/pic/102/002_3459~The-Rock-Posters.jpg

degree, gcse's alevels, masters etc, who gives a flying ****, its a piece of paper at the end of the day that to many means you can read and regurgitate the the stuff which they teach you, bloody 'ell i can set up my own college and invite people over to gain a 'quit your jibber jabber' GNVQ, BSC, MSC

[dom9]

what a cock, sorry prof.dom

I believe saj took one 'ell of a ribbing for claiming that is 5-a-side football knowledge combined with his extensive education history and not being fed with a silver spoon and matt shark recently got owned. do people not learn

http://imagecache2.allposters.com/images/pic/102/002_3459~The-Rock-Posters.jpg

degree, gcse's alevels, masters etc, who gives a flying ****, its a piece of paper at the end of the day that to many means you can read and regurgitate the the stuff which they teach you, bloody 'ell i can set up my own college and invite people over to gain a 'quit your jibber jabber' GNVQ, BSC, MSC

Look I'm not professor, and I do not pretend to be an expert. I have said that all aong. However, there are basic principles here that Saj doesn't get / know about, but yet he continues to push the point.

I don't know what you do, but if you were a plumber, I wouldn't tell you how to install a radiotor, even though I saw someone do it once.

[saj]

I'm not an expert on the subject in hand, but I have more experience it in than you do, so I pointed out quite rightly, that you were taking ****e. It's not personal, just an observation based upon tangible experience. I have pointed out the flaws in your argument, but you have chosen to ignore those. I asked your opinion on Behaviourism, but this was not responded to. You have taken exception to one post, which is fair enough, and ignored the content of the others.

I don't tend to post much in the LFC section no. For every Saj in this thread, there are 50 in there. Everyone talks ****e there, particularly because no-one is posession of the full facts, so it's all conjecture, which results in arguing.

By the way, if knowledge isn't quantifiable, what are qualifications for? Do you have any qualifications? I'm sure you must have done some GCSEs at least. Didn't you say you had a degree in that thread in which you got slaughtered by Shaggy? Did those courses / exams test your knowledge of the subject matter?

Do you ever think about what you are saying? You don't appear to.

Clearly you don't think about what you're saying as you have constantly contradicted yourself.

I have a degree, which is quantifiable. My degree and my line of work are based around IT/Computing. Can you quantify my knowledge in computing due my degree and work experience? The answer is no. I am not an expert and there is no limit to what I can learn in computing.

In that thread where apparently I got "slaughtered by Shaggy" (the five a side thread), I was responding to somebody who said that I was not very bright. I then said that if I was thick, then I would not have achieved well academically.

You say you don't post much in the LFC section and EVRYONE TALKS ****E IN THERE. But yet you have said that you have posted in there, therefore meaning you talk ****e ? The fact that you think everybody talks ****e who posts on the LFC section implies that you truly believe you are above everyone - you're deluded.

[saj]

Look I'm not professor, and I do not pretend to be an expert. I have said that all aong. However, there are basic principles here that Saj doesn't get / know about, but yet he continues to push the point.

I don't know what you do, but if you were a plumber, I wouldn't tell you how to install a radiotor, even though I saw someone do it once.

I point you to this quote, a further contradiction to your point above:

I have a Psychology degree and can categorically state that what you are talking ****e.

[Tee]

Poor Matthew Etherington. Hope he doesn't catch sight of this thread.....

[Neil Young]

Poor Matthew Etherington. Hope he doesn't catch sight of this thread.....

I bet £500,000 he doesn't.

[Chrono]

I bet £500,000 he doesn't.

Greedy.

[Neil Young]

Greedy.

I can't help it.

[Tee]

I can't help it.

Addict. You need help man... pm Saj for some guidance...

[Tee]

...or Dom9 for a second opinion.

But stay away from Fredo.

[Neil Young]

Fredo is a disease, an illness, a sickness and a curse.

[Shaggy]