It's quite simple really, anyone buying a club should have to provide, say, 75% of the funding needed to buy it, themselves - not through borrowings or debt etc. If they cant do that, then they cant buy it.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Man Ure report losses of £80m
Collapse
X
-
Yeah but it's still surprising that someone with such a long history with a club like Utd is so silent about their future. Doesn't reflect well on him at all.Originally posted by Craig_H View PostFerguson doesnt give a **** though, he'll be retired by the time it starts ****ing them up properly.Felching ≠ Gerbilling
Comment
-
If the "bloke" is as successful, wealthy and influential as Ferguson is, then yeah. He has no problem singling out opposition players, referees, the FA, UEFA, BBC etc for his rants. By his silence he is disrespecting the tradition and fans of Utd. Hate mentioning those things but they exist.Originally posted by Craig_H View PostIt's surprising that a bloke doesnt want to publicly slag off his bosses?Felching ≠ Gerbilling
Comment
-
None of those can sack him and destroy his legacy.Originally posted by badpiggy View PostIf the "bloke" is as successful, wealthy and influential as Ferguson is, then yeah. He has no problem singling out opposition players, referees, the FA, UEFA, BBC etc for his rants. By his silence he is disrespecting the tradition and fans of Utd. Hate mentioning those things but they exist.
Comment
-
Destroy his legacy? Dont be stupid, he would only add to it by being anti glazer, acting like he really cared about the club. By being silent, and even praising the glazers he is acting like a glory hunting prick who only cares about his individual legacy not that of his club.
To be fair if he acted like, dare I say it, Rafa, with regards to the ownership situation there then he would get some respect from me.
RAFA 
Comment
-
Get a load of this:
Manchester United's accounts show the Glazers are doing what they intended
Love them or hate them — and many Manchester United fans have made up their mind on that one — there is no denying that the Glazer family know what they are doing.
Paul Kelso
By Paul Kelso
Published: 8:25PM BST 08 Oct 2010
The accounts published on Friday demonstrate once again that, despite the objections of the supporters ranged against them, the massively leveraged business model they imposed on the club is doing what they intended.
A debt burden of £700 million may make some of us queasy but not apparently the Glazers. As long as United continue to perform as well as they did in 2009-10 on and off the pitch, it is a weight the club can bear.
The Glazers can thank a combination of luck, judgment and shrewd exploitation of the most marketable football club in the world for this.
Luck because they secured long-term financing before the credit crunch, and judgment because the bold decision to replace it with a bond issue paid off.
The exploitation is most obvious in the rising commercial income, up £12 million to vindicate their decision to aggressively pursue regional sponsorship deals.
Operating costs meanwhile have fallen by £10 million. This is what their advisors meant when they talked about sweating a business harder.
There are a couple of clouds on the horizon. Matchday revenue is stagnant and will remain so while the downturn lasts, and media income may have levelled out.
None of this changes the fact that the club are paying simply for the privilege of having the Floridians as owners. Interest continues to cost more than £40 million a year, not counting the ticking PIK loans, money that would be available to the club were it not servicing loans.
For that, no matter how stable the business looks, they will never be forgiven.Oh I don't know.
Comment
I say the same thing as you did, but i'm a child and you're not. Priceless.

Comment