Manchester City

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Shaggy
    Unidentified Rascal
    • Jul 2006
    • 135533

    #601
    From the BBC gossip column (albeit the Mail)...imagine if they lowered their sights to this extent

    Manchester City's interest has switched from signing Uruguay international Cavani to bringing in 29-year-old Brazil attacker Fred, who plays for Fluminense, and Benfica forward Oscar Cardozo, 30.
    Thanks very much for being

    Comment

    • Robbie-9-Fowler
      Shankly
      • Jun 2008
      • 9213

      #602
      For all their money, they really don't seem to be up to much! Lost without their scouts
      Vive la France

      Comment

      • danperkins
        Martin Skrtel can win a game of Connect Four in three moves
        • May 2010
        • 50413

        #603
        They signed tripe last season and really have to up their game. Navas IMO is like Aaron Lennon, bundles of pace but predictable, end product is lacking and i can't see him adapting to the physicality of the league.

        I'll wait until the end of the window to criticise their scouting, but at the moment they don't seem to be up to much.

        Comment

        • Robbie-9-Fowler
          Shankly
          • Jun 2008
          • 9213

          #604
          Originally posted by danperkins
          They signed tripe last season and really have to up their game. Navas IMO is like Aaron Lennon, bundles of pace but predictable, end product is lacking and i can't see him adapting to the physicality of the league.

          I'll wait until the end of the window to criticise their scouting, but at the moment they don't seem to be up to much.
          At least Navas is something that they need, a player who will stay wide and can beat a man. Fernandinho costing £30m is just something I don't get, decent player but for £30m there are much better out there.
          Vive la France

          Comment

          • danperkins
            Martin Skrtel can win a game of Connect Four in three moves
            • May 2010
            • 50413

            #605
            Originally posted by Robbie-9-Fowler
            At least Navas is something that they need, a player who will stay wide and can beat a man. Fernandinho costing £30m is just something I don't get, decent player but for £30m there are much better out there.
            True enough he does gives them width, always goes on the outside much like Lennon. Curious to see how he'll get on but IMO he'll be a flop.

            Fernandinho has looked ok when i've seen but the £30 million seems absolutely nuts.. at 28 too. Could be another javi garcia mistake.

            Comment

            • Robbie-9-Fowler
              Shankly
              • Jun 2008
              • 9213

              #606
              Originally posted by danperkins
              True enough he does gives them width, always goes on the outside much like Lennon. Curious to see how he'll get on but IMO he'll be a flop.

              Fernandinho has looked ok when i've seen but the £30 million seems absolutely nuts.. at 28 too. Could be another javi garcia mistake.
              They have too many mediocre players to win the title and I think they'll finished 3rd this year unless they step up their ideas, even with Pelegrini who is an upgrade on Mancini.
              Vive la France

              Comment

              • Neil Young
                Prosecco Socialist
                • Aug 2006
                • 62564

                #607
                Originally posted by Shaggy
                From the BBC gossip column (albeit the Mail)...imagine if they lowered their sights to this extent
                Fred?

                He's the worst forward to play for Brazil that I've ever seen.
                .
                Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



                May the Lord bless this post.

                Comment

                • Cormack74
                  Paisley
                  • Jan 2007
                  • 10533

                  #608
                  Surely Jo is worse. Or is it Bob?

                  Comment

                  • BobTheCharmer
                    Pantomime Villain
                    • Jul 2006
                    • 19183

                    #609
                    Originally posted by Cormack74
                    Surely Jo is worse. Or is it Bob?
                    I'm better than Jo you ****.
                    Always borrow money from a pessimist. He won

                    Comment

                    • Neil Young
                      Prosecco Socialist
                      • Aug 2006
                      • 62564

                      #610
                      Originally posted by Cormack74
                      Surely Jo is worse. Or is it Bob?


                      I suppose he could be. I don't remember ever seeing him. Fred's name doesn't help him of course, although yeah, Jo's pretty bad as well.

                      And they've got Bernard in the squad too.

                      Cribbins.
                      .
                      Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



                      May the Lord bless this post.

                      Comment

                      • Neil Young
                        Prosecco Socialist
                        • Aug 2006
                        • 62564

                        #611
                        Originally posted by BobTheCharmer
                        I'm better than Jo you ****.
                        .
                        Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



                        May the Lord bless this post.

                        Comment

                        • Bender
                          Hodgsoned
                          • Jul 2006
                          • 37671

                          #612
                          Originally posted by BobTheCharmer
                          I'm better than Jo you ****.

                          Comment

                          • Cormack74
                            Paisley
                            • Jan 2007
                            • 10533

                            #613
                            Originally posted by Neil Young


                            I suppose he could be. I don't remember ever seeing him. Fred's name doesn't help him of course, although yeah, Jo's pretty bad as well.

                            And they've got Bernard in the squad too.

                            Cribbins.

                            Bernards's great: Such an unlikely name for a twinkle toed Brazilian

                            Comment

                            • Neil Young
                              Prosecco Socialist
                              • Aug 2006
                              • 62564

                              #614
                              Brazilian internationals whose names don't sound Braziian:

                              --------------????---------------

                              ---????---????---????---????---

                              --------------Lucas---------------

                              -Oscar-------Lucas------Bernard

                              ----------Jo---------Fred-------
                              .
                              Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



                              May the Lord bless this post.

                              Comment

                              • little dave hedgehog
                                Token Yank
                                • Mar 2009
                                • 29966

                                #615
                                neil, you forgot smedley.
                                dave of mutilation

                                Comment

                                Working...