Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Rooney/Brucie (Good game., Good Game)

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #46
    Originally posted by Lee View Post


    Neville is clearly a **** if he really believes what he's Twittered. But I would take anything that Durham says with a bucket of salt - he's such a WUM.
    I don't think you can exonerate someone because they're a WUM. If anything it seems worse to me.

    Saying stuff just to get a reaction, to get a name for being controversial, to drive readers to his Twitter site or listeners to his radio show, all so he can make money by spreading crap he knows to be false.

    It degrades society, it's like a parasite poisoning the blood.
    .
    Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



    May the Lord bless this post.

    Comment


      #47
      Originally posted by Neil Young View Post
      Three games seems fair to me, especially given his one game ban for two yellow cards earlier in the qualifiers.
      Everyone knows that if you kick out at someone, it's a red for violent conduct and you can expect to get a three match ban. How people can argue this is beyond me.

      Originally posted by Neil Young View Post
      I don't think you can exonerate someone because they're a WUM. If anything it seems worse to me.

      Saying stuff just to get a reaction, to get a name for being controversial, to drive readers to his Twitter site or listeners to his radio show, all so he can make money by spreading crap he knows to be false.

      It degrades society, it's like a parasite poisoning the blood.


      Have you heard his show with Darren Gough on TS? They're clearly attention seeking - they both have opposite views on everything and neither have the capacity to back up their views using sense. It's like listening to a couple of kids really.

      Hmm, much like being on this forum at times.

      Comment


        #48
        .
        Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



        May the Lord bless this post.

        Comment


          #49
          Originally posted by dom9 View Post
          I can't believe some of those comments. This country is a tad embarassing at times.
          The only gracious way to accept an insult is to ignore it; if you can't ignore it, top it; if you can't top it, laugh at it; if you can't laugh at it, it's probably deserved.

          Comment

          Working...
          X