Manchester United

[Irishnev]

[ame="https://twitter.com/jamesalanrobson/status/1558524240307146754"]https://twitter.com/jamesalanrobson/status/1558524240307146754[/ame]

[danperkins]

What the manc supporters are failing to realise is that they have had the money there to buy whomever, regardless of where it came from. The simple fact is they spent it horribly and even if they got shiny new owners with deep pockets, it wouldnt make difference as they've been spending massive amounts anyways... just making a balls of it. Mismanagement of funds would be the same no matter who owns the club. They've ****ed it and are looking for someone to point the finger at.

[SB]

Oh this is glorious to watch.

[ChesterDave]

Looks disastrous business. He looks shorter than the 5 foot 9 he’s alleged to be.

Hooked at halftime. Welcome to the premier league

Maybe he is 5 foot 9 only when he does his Ronaldo tippy toes impression?

[vlahka]

[Buzzo]

https://twitter.com/jamesalanrobson/...24240307146754

He was literally on the verge of signing for City. He must absolutely despise SAF/DBF for making him change his mind.

[spud_gun]

Their attempts at passing out from the back

One thing for sure they will be launching it when they play us.

[spud_gun]

Martinez 'defending' for the third goal

They're going to have to move him to midfield

[Buzzo]

They are in a dark, dark place

[ame]https://twitter.com/markgoldbridge/status/1558548059147145222[/ame]

[SB]

They are in a dark, dark place

https://twitter.com/markgoldbridge/s...48059147145222

But they are prepared to back him but no one wants to go there

[Mr Pink]

“If they don’t back him” ehhh they just paid 55m for the defender he wanted, who he had to hook at half time today, cos he wasn’t up to it

[baitman]

Paddy Power are already paying out on Ten Hag being the first manager to be sacked

[calvoboy]

Neville is an over-emotional, clueless tit; he said that it's down to the Glazers that the mancs are a 'failing business', yet 2 minutes later tried to downplay the money that has been spent on transfers because it was generated by the "commercial success" of the club and not out of the owners' own pocket. The self-entitlement is off the charts with the cunt.

We nearly won the Champions League with Hicks and Gilett. It's just another excuse for his mate Ole - "no-one can succeed there with these owners".

[Exiled_red]

We won the Champions League with Hicks and Gilett. It's just another excuse for his mate Ole - "no-one can succeed there with these owners".

The Glazers took over in March 2003, they won the league that year and 5 times since, they won the CL as well, all under Ferguson. So it is possible to be successful with these owners, the problem is on the football side. Look at their big money transfers:

Mata £38m
Di Maria £59m
Martial £57m
Pogba £93m
Lindelof £40m
Lukaku £90m
Fred £60m
Wan Bissaka £50m
Maguire £80m
Fernandes £68m
van de Beek £40m
Sancho £73m
Varane £41m
Martinez £55m

That's almost £850m and it's difficult to argue that anything more than Fernandes has been a success so far. With that money they could have built a successful team but those players were either bought at way over the odds or the manager wasn't able to fit them into a system (or both). Based on our experience with H&G I can understand what it's like having **** owners but they are worlds away from the ownership situation we had. They are still one of the top spending clubs in world football.

[Norbs]

Sanchez cost them c.£60m too

Well worth remembering