Manchester United

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • vlahka
    Still sulking...
    • Nov 2006
    • 5428

    #31936
    20 years ago the ref would have been up for review for game fixing. These days game fixing is part of the sport.

    Comment

    • Kenneth
      Pond Scum
      • May 2007
      • 65638

      #31937
      That was ****ing ridiculous.
      Trey Nyoni: countdown to stardom- 2 years 1year 0.5 years

      Comment

      • RichC
        Meh
        • Jul 2006
        • 37415

        #31938
        It's really hard to not wonder if VAR is now being used to manipulate one way or the other when you see decisions like that.

        I mean, even Neville is saying it's a handball.

        Comment

        • kingfunk
          Doesnt subscribe to Craig's conspiracy theories!
          • May 2008
          • 11754

          #31939
          Originally posted by RichC
          It's really hard to not wonder if VAR is now being used to manipulate one way or the other when you see decisions like that.

          I mean, even Neville is saying it's a handball.

          That dopey prick ref should be suspended, or / and investigated.


          Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

          Comment

          • SB
            3rd Best at Predicting (Last season)
            • Mar 2007
            • 36124

            #31940
            []
            Originally posted by kingfunk
            That dopey prick ref should be suspended, or / and investigated.


            Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
            Me, I

            Comment

            • ChesterDave
              Paisley
              • Oct 2010
              • 32224

              #31941


              Manchester United have revealed the location for their planned new 100,000-seater stadium - approximately 350m north west of their existing Old Trafford ground.

              Last month, the Premier League club acquired a 25-acre site for the proposed stadium - a site currently partly used by a go-kart track.

              Images were unveiled on Thursday for the first time as part of a multi-billion pound draft masterplan for the regeneration project around the wider Old Trafford area, to be known as Trafford Wharfside.

              The pictures show no tridents, or canopy - the striking 'circus tent' concept - unveiled by minority owner Sir Jim Ratcliffe in March 2025, but United officials insist that idea has not been ditched.

              --

              Shall we all do our own clown joke?
              Football without Origi is nothing

              Comment

              • Le Chef
                Paisley
                • Jul 2006
                • 10751

                #31942
                Still need Freightliner to sell, plus also depends on who becomes MCR Mayor as they may rein back investment. Never going to cost £2b, double it if you are lucky, Sceptic in me can't see it being built as the cost would be far to great and both conman Jim and the Glorious Glazers won't dilute shareholding to fund
                I make no apologies, this is me

                Comment

                • Cerbie
                  Dalglish
                  • Jun 2009
                  • 2989

                  #31943
                  Originally posted by Le Chef
                  Still need Freightliner to sell, plus also depends on who becomes MCR Mayor as they may rein back investment. Never going to cost £2b, double it if you are lucky, Sceptic in me can't see it being built as the cost would be far to great and both conman Jim and the Glorious Glazers won't dilute shareholding to fund
                  If £2bn is their estimate now, before the design is finalised, land access negotiated, planning granted and a spade in the ground it could quadruple. Spurs stadium 2009 initial estimate was £250m for a 58k seater. Levy admitted the final cost was £1.2bn. That’s ~£1.5bn in today’s money.

                  They will want 100k capacity, and with the uncertainty of a brownfield site combined with a parallel publicly funded enabling development, I agree it is aspirational at best.
                  We are here for a good time not a long time....

                  Comment

                  • Le Chef
                    Paisley
                    • Jul 2006
                    • 10751

                    #31944
                    Originally posted by Cerbie

                    If £2bn is their estimate now, before the design is finalised, land access negotiated, planning granted and a spade in the ground it could quadruple. Spurs stadium 2009 initial estimate was £250m for a 58k seater. Levy admitted the final cost was £1.2bn. That’s ~£1.5bn in today’s money.

                    They will want 100k capacity, and with the uncertainty of a brownfield site combined with a parallel publicly funded enabling development, I agree it is aspirational at best.
                    Aye, Freightliner want a chunk - I heard Utd had £40m+ set aside, Freightliner wanted £400m+ - Then add in re route on the railway which Utd wanted the taxpayer to pay for - Largely doesn't make sense, Kock down the toilet and reposition it it 100m and then they have a 100k stadium for ballpark £2b .
                    I make no apologies, this is me

                    Comment

                    • Le Chef
                      Paisley
                      • Jul 2006
                      • 10751

                      #31945
                      Or you could so a refurb on the toilet for less than £100m - Stupid ! Still the biggest stadium in the UK
                      I make no apologies, this is me

                      Comment

                      • frank the tank
                        Paisley
                        • Mar 2008
                        • 12892

                        #31946
                        With Burnham being PM, wonder will that help their case to get a big taxpayer wedge though?

                        Comment

                        • Le Chef
                          Paisley
                          • Jul 2006
                          • 10751

                          #31947
                          Originally posted by frank the tank
                          With Burnham being PM, wonder will that help their case to get a big taxpayer wedge though?
                          I think a case of nepotism would be loudly shouted TBH
                          I make no apologies, this is me

                          Comment

                          • Cerbie
                            Dalglish
                            • Jun 2009
                            • 2989

                            #31948
                            Originally posted by frank the tank
                            With Burnham being PM, wonder will that help their case to get a big taxpayer wedge though?
                            Every Burnham decision will be under the microscope. I don't think there is any way to spin publicly funding a billionaire's vanity project. I'd hope Burnham would dismiss any suggestion of putting government cash into the Monaco resident's pockets immediately.
                            We are here for a good time not a long time....

                            Comment

                            • Le Chef
                              Paisley
                              • Jul 2006
                              • 10751

                              #31949
                              Youri Tielemans​ for £35m at 29 is decent business in fairness in this market, obv no sell on to gain but low enough rice to replace Casimiro for peanuts
                              I make no apologies, this is me

                              Comment

                              Working...