Dear Guest
Thank you for visiting! est189 will soon be closing its doors (do forums have doors?) please visit the following thread - (to wail & cry perhaps?)
https://www.est1892.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?p=4002484#post4002484
Thanjk you.
Paul.S
Unless they decide its more prudent to use him for a season for Champions League qualification. There's no way they'll get anybody in who's at his standard before the end of the transfer window.
I doubt this is a surprise to anyone at Arsenal. Presumably that's why they've already signed Podolski and Giroud.
I wouldnt be surprised if they'd asked Van Persie to hold off on the announcement until they'd signed replacements to try and keep the prices sensible. We saw with Carroll what happens when clubs know you have cash and need a replacement.
How much can they really get for RVP, a player with one season left on his contract and someone that's already publically stated he wont be signing a new one ?
I suppose that certain clubs are willing to pay a premium regardless of the time he has left on his contract, if it means they sign him before one of their rivals.
1/ Man City £382.2m
2/ Chelsea £190.7m
3/ Stoke £60.1m
4/ Aston Villa £50.6m
5/ Man Utd £36.6m
----------------------
7/ Liverpool £26.8m
12/ Norwich £7m
14/ Spurs £6m
15/ Swansea £4.6m
19/ Arsenal £-21.3m
I've copied this from Sky, who I think copied it from TransferLeague, so I have no idea about the top 20, but I thought it ties in with Arsenal who are spending less and shows the gulf between Man City and Chelsea (doubled) and Chelsea and Stoke (trebled).
Comment