Dear Guest
Thank you for visiting! est189 will soon be closing its doors (do forums have doors?) please visit the following thread - (to wail & cry perhaps?)
https://www.est1892.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?p=4002484#post4002484
Thanjk you.
Paul.S
Bull**** headline, Ince sr doesn't say in those quotes that his son should reject Liverpool. He says there's no point in joining us if we don't play him.
I think we're in a stronger position than is being portrayed. If he goes elsewhere for £8m then we pocket £2.8m to spend elsewhere. If the only deal matched is the £6m we're offering then I think he'd choose us.
The one thing we definitely don't want to happen is the player running down his contract. At that point we're in the same boat as everyone else and will no longer get our cut. I'd presume that 35% is of any transfer fee and doesn't include any compensation for him moving for free under 24yrs old
The one thing we definitely don't want to happen is the player running down his contract. At that point we're in the same boat as everyone else and will no longer get our cut. I'd presume that 35% is of any transfer fee and doesn't include any compensation for him moving for free under 24yrs old
Exactly.
If BR sees him as an important squad player who can develop into a first teamer, then I'm all for it.
We shouldn't be waiting until the summer regardless of the contract extension.
If his contract gets extended then they'll probably demand a higher fee.
If they don't then a whole host of clubs will be in for him, he may get an offer of guaranteed first team football elsewhere lower down the league.
At the moment we can get him for 35% cheaper than anybody else, so we'd be silly to pass up the opportunity.
(That said if I were the manager I'd rather put the money towards an established winger)
Exactly.
If BR sees him as an important squad player who can develop into a first teamer, then I'm all for it.
We shouldn't be waiting until the summer regardless of the contract extension.
If his contract gets extended then they'll probably demand a higher fee.
If they don't then a whole host of clubs will be in for him, he may get an offer of guaranteed first team football elsewhere lower down the league.
At the moment we can get him for 35% cheaper than anybody else, so we'd be silly to pass up the opportunity.
(That said if I were the manager I'd rather put the money towards an established winger)
Can we though, or are they just adding on extra to what is a fair price, to account for the 35% they'd have to give us back ?
Maybe it's why we seem to be the only club talking to them about Ince, because the price is way too high without taking off the 35%, which other clubs can't do, so if we do it, really we'll be handing the 35% back for nothing, because no other club was going to pay that asking price ?
Can we though, or are they just adding on extra to what is a fair price, to account for the 35% they'd have to give us back ?
Maybe it's why we seem to be the only club talking to them about Ince, because the price is way too high without taking off the 35%, which other clubs can't do, so if we do it, really we'll be handing the 35% back for nothing, because no other club was going to pay that asking price ?
This so called discount is a sham.
Blackpool want £x, the price of Ince to us is £x + 35%
Surly the price to anyone would be the price plus 35%? Why penalise just us, when they will lose the money to whoever?
...because no-one else thinks he's worth actual price + 35%. We're the only ones who get him for market value due to the 35% disappearing in a puff of smoke.
. Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
Comment