Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Iniesta or Zidane?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    But so did Maradona and that was hilarious

    Comment


      Originally posted by Neil Young View Post
      Oh yeah?

      You remember every little pass, every little turn, every little feint? Because it's dead easy to remember all Iniesta's from last night.

      You know how memory works. I'm happy to go with your memory of how it felt at the time you saw him but that's not the same thing, we're all inevitably judging the two players on different criteria.

      And how many moments of brilliance do you need in a game?
      How does that relate to my point? I'm not saying my recollections are perfect. I'm saying you can't fairly assume someone else's opinion differing from yours is down to their poor memory
      Like blood on iron

      Comment


        I'm saying consistency is one of the more difficult things to evaluate given we're comparing our memories of Zidane with our observations of Iniesta.

        ****'s sake, I wasn't suggesting your memory was any worse (or better) than mine. I'd have thought you could have given me a bit more credit than that.
        .
        Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



        May the Lord bless this post.

        Comment


          His is likely to be better though Neil

          Comment




            Ageist barbd.
            .
            Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



            May the Lord bless this post.

            Comment


              And Iniesta was pretty **** against Milan.
              .
              Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



              May the Lord bless this post.

              Comment


                Originally posted by Neil Young View Post


                Ageist barbd.
                In case you forget

                Comment




                  Given the regularity with which some* were having to empty their bladders...






                  * Camel, Cat and Goat**



                  ** And Elephant/Donkey***



                  *** And you
                  .
                  Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



                  May the Lord bless this post.

                  Comment


                    Comment


                      Originally posted by Tee View Post
                      Not having a go at Iniesta but they are both the same clip and I cannot see what is so impressive about the play in that segment tbh. Pretty standard stuff really and even our own Oussama showed he is capable of doing that.
                      Obviously one of them was wrong

                      Here we go :P

                      Comment


                        Originally posted by Neil Young View Post
                        I'm saying consistency is one of the more difficult things to evaluate given we're comparing our memories of Zidane with our observations of Iniesta.

                        ****'s sake, I wasn't suggesting your memory was any worse (or better) than mine. I'd have thought you could have given me a bit more credit than that.
                        Yes, how silly of me, I can see now that in prefacing it all with talk of how consistent Zidane was and focusing on ways a person might forget how often Zidane was great, you were just making a point about how difficult consistency was to assess rather than arguing your case
                        Like blood on iron

                        Comment


                          is Neil Young the only prson who gets grumpier when he is getting rugular sex

                          Comment


                            Originally posted by CJ View Post
                            is Neil Young the only prson who gets grumpier when he is getting rugular sex
                            Rugular sex

                            Mind her back doesn't chafe.
                            Like blood on iron

                            Comment


                              Originally posted by Red_Polo View Post
                              Yes, how silly of me, I can see now that in prefacing it all with talk of how consistent Zidane was and focusing on ways a person might forget how often Zidane was great, you were just making a point about how difficult consistency was to assess rather than arguing your case
                              Yes, you're right, I was. And I've outlined why I think that's a reasonable hypothesis.

                              I'd hardly be arguing that my recollection of consistency is a priori better than yours. I realise others might but we both know that's not arguable and I wouldn't do it, just like you wouldn't, even if what I said could be read that way by the less than charitable.
                              .
                              Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



                              May the Lord bless this post.

                              Comment


                                Originally posted by Red_Polo View Post
                                Rugular sex

                                Mind her back doesn't chafe.
                                lol new word

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X