Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Beckham to retire

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 6
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 template Next
    #61
    Originally posted by Tee View Post
    Let me make one thing clear here, no way on Gods earth is Beckham anywhere near as good as our own Stevie G.

    Stevie G has been one of the greatest players I have ever seen (the best ever LFC player IMO). Massive gulf in quality.


    Thanks, Tee.
    .
    Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



    May the Lord bless this post.

    Comment

      #62
      Originally posted by Tee View Post
      Really honestly just do not get that. But hey ho, if that's what you think I am not going to bother arguing the point.


      Maybe I was a bit OTT. Obviously the guy can play. But for me, he was hugely over-rated. He never dribbled past a player, he stood there, people stood off him. He stopped the ball and pinged in an awesome cross. It was typical of how much teams never tried against Utd over the years

      I actually think he was a better player as he got older and left Utd.

      Comment

        #63
        Originally posted by Sarb View Post


        Maybe I was a bit OTT. Obviously the guy can play. But for me, he was hugely over-rated. He never dribbled past a player, he stood there, people stood off him. He stopped the ball and pinged in an awesome cross. It was typical of how much teams never tried against Utd over the years

        I actually think he was a better player as he got older and left Utd.
        Oh Tee Tee.

        I think you're still doing Beckham a bit of a disservice. Of course full backs tried to stop him getting his cross in, everyone knew what a weapon it was. He just managed to do enough to, you can't claim it's luck or lack of effort from opponents FFS.
        .
        Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



        May the Lord bless this post.

        Comment

          #64
          This thread just got me thinking of this old thing from comic relief

          [ame]http://youtu.be/P842Tmi6lrc[/ame]

          Posh is clearly the brains of the beck's operation

          Comment

            #65
            Former England winger Chris Waddle thinks David Beckham would not rank in the top 1,000 Premier League players.
            Ex-Manchester United midfielder Beckham, 38, will retire from football at the end of the season.
            "I would say he has been a good player, I wouldn't put him down as a great," Waddle, 52, told BBC Radio 5 Live.
            "You can go down a list of footballers since the Premier League and I don't think David Beckham would probably be in the first 1,000."
            BBC

            Comment

              #66
              Originally posted by Bender View Post
              Former England winger Chris Waddle thinks David Beckham would not rank in the top 1,000 Premier League players.
              Ex-Manchester United midfielder Beckham, 38, will retire from football at the end of the season.
              "I would say he has been a good player, I wouldn't put him down as a great," Waddle, 52, told BBC Radio 5 Live.
              "You can go down a list of footballers since the Premier League and I don't think David Beckham would probably be in the first 1,000."
              BBC
              "Its not about the long ball or the short ball, its about the right ball." Bob Paisley

              Comment

                #67
                I can't believe Chris Waddle is 52
                Thanks very much for being ‘This Mornings’ Farmer’

                Comment

                  #68
                  Originally posted by Shaggy View Post
                  I can't believe Chris Waddle is 52
                  Peter Shilton is 64.
                  "Its not about the long ball or the short ball, its about the right ball." Bob Paisley

                  Comment

                    #69
                    ****ing hell
                    Thanks very much for being ‘This Mornings’ Farmer’

                    Comment

                      #70
                      I hate the fact the David Seaman is 50 this year!
                      The times they are a changin'.

                      Comment

                        #71
                        When exactly do you wish he had died? And why?
                        .
                        Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



                        May the Lord bless this post.

                        Comment

                          #72
                          Originally posted by Gibbo View Post
                          I hate the fact the David Seaman is 50 this year!


                          Neil Young is gonna be 60 this year.
                          Are we winning?

                          Comment

                            #73
                            .
                            Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



                            May the Lord bless this post.

                            Comment

                              #74
                              But it's true though.
                              Are we winning?

                              Comment

                                #75


                                No it isn't.
                                .
                                Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



                                May the Lord bless this post.

                                Comment

                                Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 template Next
                                Working...
                                X