Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Newcastle United

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by Exiled_red View Post
    These are supposedly the clubs who voted against it: https://twitter.com/martynziegler/st...41274987807230
    They should force another ballot next season, maybe Ev and Sheffield will be plying their trade in the Championship then.
    We are here for a good time not a long time....

    Comment


      Just watch Forest get a bunch of top quality loanees at rock bottom prices in January.
      We are here for a good time not a long time....

      Comment


        Neves to Newcastle it is then.
        _____________________________________

        Weak willed, Wank or do they have a masterplan?

        Think we have the answer..Slot!!

        Comment


          Crock of ****e, pandoras box well and truly opened

          Comment




            Newcastle United have been to court to stop HM Revenue and Customs using material seized during a raid of the club as part of an investigation into an alleged multi-million-pound tax scandal there.

            It emerged on Wednesday that the Premier League side had spent almost two-and-a-half years trying to force HMRC to hand over digital copies of documents originally taken when scores of officers swooped on their offices at St James’ Park on April 26 in 2017.

            A raid was also carried out that day on West Ham United’s London Stadium, with HMRC officials taking away computers, financial records and mobile phones as part of Operation Loom.

            Lee Charnley, then Newcastle managing director, was arrested but later released without charge.

            Newcastle went to court to challenge the legality of the raid but High Court judges ruled warrants had been “lawfully issued”.

            HMRC told Leeds Crown Court the club had “systematically abused” the tax system to “secretly” make payments to agents and players during transfers, while Newcastle argued there were no reasonable grounds for believing they had engaged in tax fraud.

            HMRC ended its criminal investigation into the two Premier League sides in May 2021 but warned it would be wrong to assume that was the end of the matter and that it had “a raft of civil powers” at its disposal.

            It has now been disclosed in a High Court judgment published on Wednesday that HMRC also wrote to Newcastle stating the criminal investigation had indicated “tax non-compliance of a serious nature”, that “the matter will now be referred to colleagues elsewhere within the Fraud Investigation Service” and that the appellant’s related “_…_appeals against the assessments to Income Tax, National Insurance Contributions and VAT [which] are currently stayed by the First Tier Tribunal” would also be “dealt with under the banner of civil investigation”.

            Newcastle went to court that same month to force HMRC to hand over copies taken of material seized as part of the criminal investigation, which would have prevented their use in any civil proceedings.

            The court rejected the club’s application but they continued to pursue the matter – even after their October 2021 Saudi-led takeover – before ultimately losing an appeal heard at the High Court last month.

            The judgment included a timeline of HMRC’s pursuit of Newcastle, which began as long ago as April 2014, when it wrote to the club to advise it was conducting a civil enquiry into agents’ fees.

            Following the April 2017 raids, HMRC issued notices to the club in January 2018 relating to alleged unpaid VAT totalling £2,034,802 plus interest between February 2011 and October 2016 and unpaid National Insurance totalling £4,250,714.01 plus interest, a court fee and legal costs.

            HMRC declined to comment on the status of its investigation into Newcastle or about the amount of money the club are being pursued over.

            Newcastle did not respond to requests for comment.

            Comment


              [ame="https://twitter.com/telefootball/status/1745107612583014424"]https://twitter.com/telefootball/status/1745107612583014424[/ame]

              Sell on clause

              Comment


                Originally posted by Irishnev View Post
                OOOOH - I thought they were looking at Calvert Lewin, He's off the the Arse then
                I make no apologies, this is me

                Comment


                  Wonder how much he would cost?

                  £60m + I'd imagine

                  Comment


                    Don’t we have a sell on clause? I think I read 20% somewhere

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by Sus View Post
                      Don’t we have a sell on clause? I think I read 20% somewhere
                      20% of profit - we sold for 19

                      Comment


                        Originally posted by Irishnev View Post
                        20% of profit - we sold for 19
                        Thanks. Would imagine he would go for at least 30m

                        Comment


                          £40m plus
                          James Philip Milner Fanclub #1

                          Curtis Julian Jones Fanclub #1

                          Comment


                            Yeh Bournemouth have a few quid now. Can't see anything less than 50m
                            _____________________________________

                            Weak willed, Wank or do they have a masterplan?

                            Think we have the answer..Slot!!

                            Comment


                              Originally posted by Rich View Post
                              £40m plus

                              £4m ish at that level then. A week of Mbappe’s wages
                              Hello mert.

                              Comment


                                He has kicked on a bit but to be honest i thought Newcastle would be aiming a bit higher than Solanke

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X