VAR thread

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ChesterDave
    Paisley
    • Oct 2010
    • 32224

    #1306
    FOR ****ING ****S SAKE.

    Everyone knows mistakes can be made. That's why they get the chance to review the decision with the benefit of a ****ing video ****ing replay So they don't have to make that mistake with one viewing at full speed.

    ****.
    Football without Origi is nothing

    Comment

    • Lee
      Chunder camel
      • Dec 2006
      • 32028

      #1307
      It’s utterly baffling how they’ve refused to use the automated tech that was used in the World Cup.

      It’s instant and much better than the lines they draw. Why wouldn’t they use it just as a supplementary measure if nothing else?

      I think we need to keep VAR but by Christ we need competent people to use it. Staggering.

      Comment

      • RichC
        Meh
        • Jul 2006
        • 37415

        #1308
        Originally posted by Lee
        It’s utterly baffling how they’ve refused to use the automated tech that was used in the World Cup.

        It’s instant and much better than the lines they draw. Why wouldn’t they use it just as a supplementary measure if nothing else?

        I think we need to keep VAR but by Christ we need competent people to use it. Staggering.
        Turkeys voting for Xmas I guess. Lessens the need for loads of incompetent fools being overpaid for something they're not very good at.

        Comment

        • Lee
          Chunder camel
          • Dec 2006
          • 32028

          #1309
          Originally posted by RichC
          Turkeys voting for Xmas I guess. Lessens the need for loads of incompetent fools being overpaid for something they're not very good at.

          Comment

          • rudedog
            Pig hater
            • Feb 2007
            • 9911

            #1310
            Originally posted by RichC
            Turkeys voting for Xmas I guess. Lessens the need for loads of incompetent fools being overpaid for something they're not very good at.
            It also provides a larger surface for bias/corruption to enter the process.

            Comment

            • Scratch
              If you fail once....
              • Jul 2006
              • 7887

              #1311
              Originally posted by Lee
              It’s utterly baffling how they’ve refused to use the automated tech that was used in the World Cup.

              It’s instant and much better than the lines they draw. Why wouldn’t they use it just as a supplementary measure if nothing else?

              I think we need to keep VAR but by Christ we need competent people to use it. Staggering.
              14 of the clubs voted against it, can't hang that one against PGMOL unfortunately.

              Comment

              • Fivex
                The Wisp
                • Nov 2006
                • 23867

                #1312
                Any indication what the resistance was over?
                Hello mert.

                Comment

                • Rich
                  Est1892's Fire Warden
                  • Jul 2006
                  • 34417

                  #1313
                  I think the best thing that comes from this is that this VAR bunker and on-field Refs comms are made available to some oversight entity.

                  Ideally it's all made public but I don't think that'll happen.

                  Why we're expecting Refs to also perform VAR duties is mindboggling too - there'll be a load of unfit people that couldn't run around a PL pitch for 90 minutes but could easily be trained with the rules and the tech.

                  It would also help immensely if they were two seperate teams and not so ****ing pally pally.

                  Finally - moonlighting should be banned and if that means PL needs to pay the officials more then so be it.
                  James Philip Milner Fanclub #1

                  Curtis Julian Jones Fanclub #1

                  Comment

                  • Kenneth
                    Pond Scum
                    • May 2007
                    • 65636

                    #1314
                    That’s not enough. This was a systemic failure, failure of a system to perform its primary task. When that happens, the system has to be revised. Helping people understand why the system failed is useless really.
                    Trey Nyoni: countdown to stardom- 2 years 1year 0.5 years

                    Comment

                    • dom9
                      Ant Pisser
                      • Aug 2006
                      • 69011

                      #1315
                      Originally posted by Kenneth
                      That’s not enough. This was a systemic failure, failure of a system to perform its primary task. When that happens, the system has to be revised. Helping people understand why the system failed is useless really.
                      If you don't understand why the system / process failed, you can't fix it.

                      Unless you're talking about the wider public rather than those who are responsible for it? And even then, I think there is a more than fair case for transparency even if it results in complete humiliation for those involved (and well, we've already gone past that point haven't we).
                      Oh I don't know.

                      Comment

                      • Fosterbloke
                        Run the Jewels
                        • Dec 2009
                        • 39095

                        #1316
                        I'd be extremely surprised if we got a replay. If the ref or VAR team were proven to be on the take then yeah sure but otherwise, it's just a **** up and that's part of football as far as they're concerned.
                        Was mu

                        Comment

                        • Kenneth
                          Pond Scum
                          • May 2007
                          • 65636

                          #1317
                          Originally posted by dom9
                          If you don't understand why the system / process failed, you can't fix it.

                          Unless you're talking about the wider public rather than those who are responsible for it? And even then, I think there is a more than fair case for transparency even if it results in complete humiliation for those involved (and well, we've already gone past that point haven't we).
                          I meant the latter. More transparency of a broken system isn’t the end goal is what I’m getting at.
                          Trey Nyoni: countdown to stardom- 2 years 1year 0.5 years

                          Comment

                          • dom9
                            Ant Pisser
                            • Aug 2006
                            • 69011

                            #1318
                            Originally posted by Kenneth
                            I meant the latter. More transparency of a broken system isn’t the end goal is what I’m getting at.
                            I disagree. Full transparency should be the order of the day.

                            A fully functional system should of course be the starting point, but either way, the murkiness of the decision making currently is not acceptable.
                            Oh I don't know.

                            Comment

                            • Scratch
                              If you fail once....
                              • Jul 2006
                              • 7887

                              #1319
                              Originally posted by Fivex
                              Any indication what the resistance was over?
                              Apparently;

                              "Chief executives across the organisation's clubs are said to believe that the technology may date too quickly for it to prove a difference-maker."

                              From the Daily Mail article about it here

                              Comment

                              • Lee
                                Chunder camel
                                • Dec 2006
                                • 32028

                                #1320
                                Originally posted by Scratch
                                14 of the clubs voted against it, can't hang that one against PGMOL unfortunately.
                                Ah wasn’t aware.

                                Comment

                                Working...