Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

A Critical Evaluation of Rafa

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    By the way, I think Agger is a very good player who will only get better. The huge difference in his performance against Drogba in the two legs of the semi-final was particularly encouraging I thought and shows what he should be capable of regularly when he has more experience.
    .
    Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



    May the Lord bless this post.

    Comment


      Originally posted by Neil Young View Post
      I think judging him on his very bad performance at the San Siro is a little unfair. He hadn't played for a few games and seemed to be short of fitness and match practice. He also didn't have his regular centreback partner.
      I know, but I had to mention it because I enjoyed it so much at the time.

      Comment


        Originally posted by Neil Young View Post
        By the way, I think Agger is a very good player who will only get better. The huge difference in his performance against Drogba in the two legs of the semi-final was particularly encouraging I thought and shows what he should be capable of regularly when he has more experience.
        Drogba turned him once in the first leg and everyone makes it sound like he was continously raped.

        He played fine in the first and second legs as he has done all season.
        The Crushing Machine MKII

        Comment


          Originally posted by desertscouser View Post
          I know, but I had to mention it because I enjoyed it so much at the time.


          That's completely understandable.
          .
          Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



          May the Lord bless this post.

          Comment


            Originally posted by SpeedyG View Post
            Drogba turned him once in the first leg and everyone makes it sound like he was continously raped.

            He played fine in the first and second legs as he has done all season.
            I have never made it sound like he was "raped" because I don't like that expression to be used so casually. You use it if you really want but please don't associate me with it.

            I thought Agger was targetted by Chelsea in both games. As a result he looked the weak link in the first game (even though that may have been due to poor cover from Riise) yet, whether because of individual coaching or a change in tactics by Rafa, he was totally dominant in the second leg.
            .
            Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



            May the Lord bless this post.

            Comment


              Originally posted by Neil Young View Post
              I think your bald statement that Agger is the better player needs some rationale since that's the argument (now). In terms of who is the better player right now I don't see why age or the size of the transfer fee come into the equation.

              On ability right now, I'm not sure Ferdinand is quite as bad as many of us, including me, would like to believe.

              Am I right in thinking he's faster than Agger? If so, that's certainly an advantage. He also plays in a defence which does not benefit from having top quality defensive midfielders in front, in a team that arguably plays more attacking football so tending to leave the defenders more isolated, especially given that their full-backs also often play further up the pitch than ours (I'm thinking primarily of Evra rather than Heinze on the left here).

              I'm not saying I like Ferdinand or that I think he's great but when assessing his abilities, I do think it's important to remember though that he was a mainstay of a team that has just won the League. (I feel so unclean saying that ).

              Obviously given the transfer fee and age then Agger has to be the better value. Other than that I think the case is at least arguable.


              I would prefer to have Agger in our team everytime. He's certainly less error prone than Ferdinand. I don't know what the difference in pace is like. If there is any, it's not noticeable. Transfer fee obviously doesn't influence ability, but with respect to age it's worth nothing that Ferdinand is supposedly in his prime whereas Agger is still developing. It's another argument why I'm glad we have Agger and not Ferdinand.


              dww makes an excellent point; the Scum's potency in attack and the pace with which they attack doesn't necessarily mean that their defence is left exposed. It only tends to happen in Europe against more wily teams like Milan, but in the Premiership teams are intimidated and also don't always have the ability to exploit any holes left behind.

              Comment


                Originally posted by Redlife View Post
                I would prefer to have Agger in our team everytime. He's certainly less error prone than Ferdinand. I don't know what the difference in pace is like. If there is any, it's not noticeable. Transfer fee obviously doesn't influence ability, but with respect to age it's worth nothing that Ferdinand is supposedly in his prime whereas Agger is still developing. It's another argument why I'm glad we have Agger and not Ferdinand.


                dww makes an excellent point; the Scum's potency in attack and the pace with which they attack doesn't necessarily mean that their defence is left exposed. It only tends to happen in Europe against more wily teams like Milan, but in the Premiership teams are intimidated and also don't always have the ability to exploit any holes left behind.
                They're good arguments.
                .
                Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



                May the Lord bless this post.

                Comment


                  Originally posted by Redlife View Post
                  I would prefer to have Agger in our team everytime. He's certainly less error prone than Ferdinand. I don't know what the difference in pace is like. If there is any, it's not noticeable. Transfer fee obviously doesn't influence ability, but with respect to age it's worth nothing that Ferdinand is supposedly in his prime whereas Agger is still developing. It's another argument why I'm glad we have Agger and not Ferdinand.


                  dww makes an excellent point; the Scum's potency in attack and the pace with which they attack doesn't necessarily mean that their defence is left exposed. It only tends to happen in Europe against more wily teams like Milan, but in the Premiership teams are intimidated and also don't always have the ability to exploit any holes left behind.
                  When Ferdinand wasn't playing in either leg.

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by Neil Young View Post
                    I have never made it sound like he was "raped" because I don't like that expression to be used so casually. You use it if you really want but please don't associate me with it.
                    Mountain, Molehill.
                    The Crushing Machine MKII

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by Reds08 View Post
                      We will only ever finish third with rafa at the helm. He doesn't have what it takes to when the Premiership, three years have made that obvious enough. Sad fact. And before all the abuse starts coming my way, look at what Rafa HAS ACTUALLY DONE in the league, not what you want him to do. I can comprehensively prove the point, so don't start arguing.
                      After reading the posts on here you seem to have a soft spot for United and there tactics, would you have sacked Ferguson only after 3 seasons? How long did it take him to build a Championship winning side at United? How long was it before he won anything for them?

                      Its utter nonsense to say Rafa will never win the league, in his second season he was 2 games off winning the league. If we had of beat Chelsea twice instead of getting beat twice number 19 would have been ours. He now has a great spine of a team and with a few quality players added will be able to challenge for the league.

                      It took Ferguson 5 years to win anything and 6 for the league, in 3 years Rafa has won us the Champs League, FA Cup and got to another Euro Final (Something Ferguson hasnt managed to do it over two decades). Rafa is twice the manager Ferguson is, and Ferguson seems to have done alright in the league. Need to have faith in the tactical master

                      Comment


                        Originally posted by SpeedyG View Post
                        Mountain, Molehill.
                        That's your opinion.

                        You have no knowledge of my background, of what may or may not have happened to people close to me, etc.

                        I asked you nicely. It's a shame you chose to respond in such an immature and insensitive manner.
                        .
                        Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



                        May the Lord bless this post.

                        Comment


                          Originally posted by Neil Young View Post
                          That's your opinion.

                          You have no knowledge of my background, of what may or may not have happened to people close to me, etc.

                          I asked you nicely. It's a shame you chose to respond in such an immature and insensitive manner.
                          Get over yerself
                          The Crushing Machine MKII

                          Comment


                            Originally posted by SpeedyG View Post
                            Get over yerself
                            .
                            Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



                            May the Lord bless this post.

                            Comment


                              So how many clear mistakes has Agger done for us. The only one I can think of is the one against Drogba but that wasn't a big mistake.

                              Agger is the best central defender in the league IMO. He reminds me a lot of Sammer and he was the best defender in Europe for a few years before he had to quit because of a bad injury.
                              Just believe and you never know what will happen.

                              According to Benitez it's important not simply to go out to win but to go out prepared to win, which means players have to put in the same level of work on a daily basis. Anything else is unacceptable.

                              Comment


                                Originally posted by AFII View Post
                                So how many clear mistakes has Agger done for us. The only one I can think of is the one against Drogba but that wasn't a big mistake.

                                Agger is the best central defender in the league IMO. He reminds me a lot of Sammer and he was the best defender in Europe for a few years before he had to quit because of a bad injury.
                                I can't remember one either. Thats got to be unheard of.
                                The Crushing Machine MKII

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X