The Rob Styles thread

[AFII]

So you think Cara deliberately handled the ball in the box for the pen?

It was a correct penalty last week. Carra didn't had his arm or hand anywere close to his body so it doesn't matter if it was deliberate or not.

[marcus50bucks]

Of course **** decisions happen, but you were suggesting that Villa were robbed. That is untrue imo.

It was never a freekick in a million years. Petrov clearly got the ball!

[cobain]

If you scousers we're as hard as you made out, it would be a non-issue!

Why is he here again?

[Sir Bob]

I think anyone that dismisses the possibility of the ref being bribed is being naive. Its happened in Italy and happened to us against Inter Milan in 1965.

Syles today was either totally incompetent or he clearly favoured Chelsea. For me the latter is just as likely. It wasn't just the penalty decision. He clearly sent essien off then changed his mind. At every free kick their wall was about 6 yards back. He gave us nothing.

Now Styles is poor, he always has been. Our peno last season against Sheff U was a joke but I don't believe he was just incompeteant today, I genuinely believed he favoured Chelsea.

[Kenneth]

It was never a freekick in a million years. Petrov clearly got the ball!

Yep, it was clearly a very dodgy freekick.

[Kenneth]

I think anyone that dismisses the possibility of the ref being bribed is being naive. Its happened in Italy and happened to us against Inter Milan in 1965.

Syles today was either totally incompetent or he clearly favoured Chelsea. For me the latter is just as likely. It wasn't just the penalty decision. He clearly sent essien off then changed his mind. At every free kick their wall was about 6 yards back. He gave us nothing.

Now Styles is poor, he always has been. Our peno last season against Sheff U was a joke but I don't believe he was just incompeteant today, I genuinely believed he favoured Chelsea.

I think it could certainly be bias, but I don't think that direct bribary is a likely explanation.

[monkey13831]

To be honest I don't think he has been bribed... he's that incompetent how could you bribe him and have any confidence he could make the right decision to help you!

[Morph]

I think anyone that dismisses the possibility of the ref being bribed is being naive. Its happened in Italy and happened to us against Inter Milan in 1965.

Syles today was either totally incompetent or he clearly favoured Chelsea. For me the latter is just as likely. It wasn't just the penalty decision. He clearly sent essien off then changed his mind. At every free kick their wall was about 6 yards back. He gave us nothing.

Now Styles is poor, he always has been. Our peno last season against Sheff U was a joke but I don't believe he was just incompeteant today, I genuinely believed he favoured Chelsea.

he booked more chelsea players, he didn't send Essien or whoever off because he's a bottler and maybe he didn't want to answer to the FA about his decisions, the penalty decision was just his typical standard of refereeing, he's card happy and a prick, nothing in that match said to me he's favouring the other side just that he's incompetent and ****

[AFII]

I think it could certainly be bias, but I don't think that direct bribary is a likely explanation.

As Sir Bob says. It's naive to think that bribed refs don't exist in the PL.

It's to much money involved for that not being the case and the FA is to scared to do any proper investigation.

[desertscouser]

I groaned and moaned when I saw Styles was the ref and he didn't let me down.

WHAT. A. ****.

He should be struck off.

The **** should be shot.

[Tom]

When referrees are bribed they only have to make one match-changing decision - it doesn't matter that he booked more of them than us.

[Joe King]

Theres a woman on 606 who knows nothing about football. Typical

[desertscouser]

When referrees are bribed they only have to make one match-changing decision - it doesn't matter that he booked more of them than us.

Exactly right. In fact by booking more Chav palyers he could easily have been trying to divert attention from his mach changing decision. He was either paid off or he's a complete incompetent cock sucker who should be dealt with.

[Morph]

When referrees are bribed they only have to make one match-changing decision - it doesn't matter that he booked more of them than us.

maybe so, but i still don't think he favoured them, he's a **** ref and always has been, he was trying to be the big time Charlie and got it badly wrong today as he does most games

[desertscouser]

Theres a woman on 606 who knows nothing about football. Typical

Apart from red hot and mumsafan, women know nothing about the beautiful game.