Dear Guest
Thank you for visiting! est189 will soon be closing its doors (do forums have doors?) please visit the following thread - (to wail & cry perhaps?)
https://www.est1892.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?p=4002484#post4002484
Thanjk you.
Paul.S
I don't ever recall Rafa making a double substitution. Am I wrong? Maybe it's a policy of his? He often does this - makes one change, shifts a player into another position for five minutes, then takes him off for someone more naturally suited to that position. Just like Yossi/Kuyt on Saturday.
Is it a cautious approach, insofar as him seeing two changes at once as some sort of gamble...? In case, say, someone gets injured soon after the first substitution and he has to change his plans?
Such as why play Leto in a vital champions league match? Why play Carragher and Torres in a carling cup match when we have 3 vital games to come over the following 10 days?
Is it so wrong to make a double change at half-time when players clearly arent performing? Perhaps it would send out a strong message to them? Why is making half time changes so wrong?
I don't ever recall Rafa making a double substitution. Am I wrong? Maybe it's a policy of his? He often does this - makes one change, shifts a player into another position for five minutes, then takes him off for someone more naturally suited to that position. Just like Yossi/Kuyt on Saturday.
Is it a cautious approach, insofar as him seeing two changes at once as some sort of gamble...? In case, say, someone gets injured soon after the first substitution and he has to change his plans?
also, why do you wait until the 60th min to make changes, why not take a chance and change at the break?
"Who's your Daddy now?"
LFC Champions one season someday
Jurgen Klopp is just boss
Semi retired poster
twitter: @parmsahota
insta:@parm78
also, why do you wait until the 60th min to make changes, why not take a chance and change at the break?
One of two possible answers for this, IMO.
a) Rafa has formulated a plan for this particular game, a plan he obviously thinks will work. The stubborn side of him sees no reason for this to have changed after just 45 minutes, and he persists with the plan he thought would win us the game.
Admirable in one sense - insofar as he backs himself, has confidence and belief in his own judgement and isn't fickle. He has a clear idea and a clear footballing philosophy, something I felt Houllier lacked.
Frustrating, in the other sense, as it could be construed as being cautious. Sometimes you just want him to throw caution to the wind and ****ing go for it. Against Marseille, for example, I would've made two changes at half-time.
Or...
b) Again it's his cautious side...insurance against possible injuries that would force his hand into a change of plan.
Thanks very much for being ‘This Mornings’ Farmer’
Comment