Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

DIC latest - the largely wild speculation thread

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Liverpool in tug of war as DIC close in on deal
    By David Bond, Chief Sports Reporter
    Last Updated: 12:40am GMT 05/03/2008


    Liverpool's chief executive, Rick Parry, was involved last night in crucial talks between Dubai International Capital and lawyers for George Gillett, as the Arab investment company tried to close a deal for the American's 50 per cent stake in the club.


    Although Gillett's co-owner, Tom Hicks, continued to insist yesterday that he would block him from selling out to DIC, The Daily Telegraph can reveal that negotiations between Gillett's legal team, Parry and PCP Capital Partners, advisers to the Dubai group, continued late into the night. They broke up shortly before 11pm with no agreement with Gillett reached.

    Although the offer, thought to be in the region of £80 million, would give Gillett a massive profit on his initial £7m cash investment in the club last February, it is understood he is holding out for more. Talks are expected to resume this morning.

    While Parry's involvement in the negotiations would appear to suggest he is controversially siding with DIC in their bid for control, a source close to the Liverpool chief executive insisted last night that he had been invited to the meeting near Westminster as an independent observer. The source stressed that Parry's prime role at the meeting was to protect the interests of the club.

    The critical talks came at the end of a day when DIC raised the stakes in the battle for control of Anfield. Speaking for the first time in public about DIC's second bid for Liverpool inside 13 months, Sameer Al Ansari, chief executive of DIC, confirmed the talks and accused Hicks and Gillett of being in "dreamland" over their valuations of the club.

    "It's no secret that we have been in discussions with the current owners," Al Ansari said. "It's not easy because the owners are in dreamland about valuations at the moment." With Hicks defiantly refusing to go quietly, the key to the success of DIC's latest raid on Anfield now hinges on the outcome of talks with Gillett.

    DIC yesterday made an offer worth more than £450m to the Americans, who bought Liverpool for £220m last February. That offer includes the £350m of debt recently refinanced by Hicks and Gillett with Royal Bank of Scotland and US investment bank Wachovia, plus at least £25m in cash to Hicks and around £80m to Gillett in return for their equity.

    Hicks immediately rejected the offer yesterday and, according to sources close to the Texan billionaire, made it clear that he not only has first refusal on Gillett's shares but also has the power to veto anyone he tries to sell them to.

    It is also understood that he now wants to buy one per cent of Gillett's stock, giving him the protection of a 51 per cent majority holding and allowing him to obtain complete control at Anfield. He has indicated he would allow Gillett to dispose of his remaining 49 per cent but would still be unlikely to endorse a deal with DIC.

    One DIC source dismissed the threat last night, claiming it would trigger a change of control clause in the terms of the new loans which were signed off in January. DIC believe they have the backing of the banks to press ahead with their bid for control of the club.

    Nevertheless Hicks' determination to remain in charge at Liverpool remains undimmed and even if DIC manage to clinch a deal with Gillett, they may be forced to accept an uneasy power sharing arrangement with Hicks. DIC have made it clear, however, that they want complete management control of the club.

    Liverpool fans anxious for an end to this saga will fear the effects of a stalemate between warring owners. Despite Hicks' defiance, DIC are confident that it will only be a matter of time before he agrees to do a deal with them. They believe his American business empire is in trouble and the failure of recent attempts to raise money through a partial flotation of Hicks Holdings in the US have wrecked any hopes he had of seeing off the threat of DIC by buying out Gillett himself.

    Comment


      Originally posted by MascheredUp View Post


      Can we rely on this bitch?
      Well she gets my DIC going anyway. I think she's got very seductive 'come to bed' eyes - Pity she isn't THE Amanda Staveley.

      As for the takeover saga - well...erm..I hope DIC wins through.

      Comment


        Dubai bidders warn Hicks they will not increase offer


        Andy Hunter
        Wednesday March 5, 2008
        The Guardian

        Dubai International Capital has warned Tom Hicks it will not improve its offer for Liverpool after the Anfield co-chairman rejected an opening bid of £400m for the club. DIC's chief executive, Sameer al-Ansari, a lifelong Liverpool supporter, went public with his frustration at the demands of Hicks and the American's co-owner, George Gillett, yesterday when he confirmed talks had taken place. "The owners are in dreamland about valuations at the moment," he said. He later clarified that one of the owners "had come out of dreamland", without elaborating.


        Hicks and Gillett received offers last Wednesday of £200m for each's 50% stake in Liverpool - giving each a profit of £25m on their 13-month investment - from Amanda Staveley, a partner of the investment firm PCP that represents DIC, who set a deadline of midnight last night to pressure Gillett into an agreement.

        DIC was yesterday holding talks with lawyers for Gillett about the sale of his 50% stake and hope an agreement will put pressure on Hicks to follow suit. Hicks "turned down their offer immediately upon receipt", according to a source involved in the negotiations while Gillett, although committed to selling, is believed to be holding out for a larger profit. Gillett has encouraged DIC for several months without committing to a deal and his stance has enabled his co-chairman to explore ways of raising the capital required to buy a majority stake.

        Both businessmen have first refusal on the other's investment along with the power of veto over any sale, an option Hicks declared a willingness to employ after receiving DIC's offer last week. Hicks has held extensive talks with would-be investors prepared to back his attempt to buy Gillett out and is determined to retain a shareholding. Unless DIC raises its offer, or the club struggles to meet annual interest payments of almost £30m, Hicks' position will stymie the investment arm of the Dubai government.

        It is understood Hicks will only approve the sale of Gillett's stake to a third party who will allow him to gain majority control. DIC have made clear their intention to become the dominant influence at Anfield and, with their opening bid stalled, may wait on the success or otherwise of Hicks' attempts to buy out Gillett.

        Al-Ansari's warning came ahead of the home game against West Ham tonight and encouraged supporters' groups opposed to the Americans. Neil Atkinson, spokesman for the Liverpool Supporters Union Spirit Of Shankly, said: "Supporters will make their feelings known at the West Ham game. Let Mr Hicks and Mr Gillett go now with their profit."

        José Reina, meanwhile, has admitted it is imperative Liverpool win their game in hand on Everton tonight and keep fourth place from their local rivals before they meet at Anfield on March 30. "Our main target now is to have more points than Everton when the time comes to play them," said the Liverpool goalkeeper. "That game is coming up soon and we know it will be difficult."

        Comment


          Originally posted by sinbad View Post
          The source stressed that Parry's prime role at the meeting was to protect the interests of the club.
          How ****ing ironic. No doubt he won't be pushing for a deal between DIC and Gillett then. Really protected the interests of the club when he recommended selling to the Yanks

          Comment


            So Hicks and Gillett are dead men walking. DIC have them locked in their sights it appears. More positive news today

            Comment


              Liverpool's takeover bid replay

              * Mihir Bose - article (snipped)
              Could be a long time yet though...
              Last edited by MrMichael; 05-03-08, 09:22 AM.

              Comment


                Liverpool's takeover bid replay
                * Mihir Bose - BBC sports editor
                * 4 Mar 08, 05:43 PM

                The news that Dubai International Capital made a formal offer for Liverpool to its American owners is essentially a replay of a take-over game that Reds fans, and the world, thought was done and dusted a year ago.

                I believe we have barely reached half-time in this replayed encounter and it may take weeks if not months to finish but it is worth considering how DIC is now trying to pay back the Americans in the same way that the Americans, and in particular Gillett, stung DIC just over a year ago.

                Then DIC, having thought it had got Liverpool, was thwarted almost in injury time by George Gillett in partnership with Tom Hicks.

                Think back to mid-December 2006. Then it was announced that the Liverpool board had accepted the DIC offer and Gillett had been told to go away - at that stage no-one had heard of Tom Hicks.

                That afternoon I was on my way to Heathrow for a short holiday when I got a call from a Gillett source saying the American was not walking away. He was still in there.

                Soon a document drawn up by Dubai International Capital, called Project Oslo, came my way. It was a financial assessment of Liverpool.

                It mentioned the sort of investment return that could be expected and, among other things, spoke of holding the investment for seven or eight years and then selling the club.

                It was the kind of document that any sensible City of London investor would make of a purchase but, in a football world marked by emotion, it came as a bit of a shock.

                Until that stage, fans of Liverpool had been quite taken by DIC taking over the club. Like all fans, ever since a certain Roman Abramovich suddenly jetted in to buy Chelsea, Liverpool fans were hoping for a money messiah.

                My revelations of DIC's internal plans were cleverly exploited by Gillett. It helped build up fan unease about DIC and Gillett supplemented this by a higher offer - a wooing of the board to snatch the prize away from DIC.

                The offer made David Moores an even richer man, richer by some £88m, and it also saw Rick Parry get £500,000 for managing to sell the club after years of effort which had involved wooing several investors including Thaksin Shinawatra, who has since taken over Manchester City.

                Hicks, it is worth recalling, came in only at the last minute as the partner who would help Gillett fund the deal - Gillett having looked for other partners before settling on Hicks. Hicks' arrival was presented as a welcome bonus - two owners being better than one.

                For a time, the Americans lapped up the praise and were contrasted favourably with the Glazers, their reclusive compatriots who never talk to the press and had loaded on a lot of debt to Manchester United.

                The high point of the Gillett-Hicks honeymoon was, probably, the Champions League Final at Athens.

                My abiding memory is of Gillett in an Athens hotel shaking hands with Liverpool fans, who were almost lining up to thank him for taking over the club. But the morning after the final defeat saw Rafa Benitez make his first unfavourable comments on the American owners.

                Gillett later tried to put this down to Benitez having spent a sleepless night walking the streets of Athens - he had to give up his hotel room due to problems in accommodation. But that moment marked the turning of the tide.

                Since then, a lot has happened between owners and manager and the owners themselves. The owners talked of replacing Rafa with Jurgen Klinsmann and, while that spat was patched up, the partnership of Gillett and Hicks has all but collapsed. Rarely in a partnership of this nature have two partners, who both own 50% of a club, given such contrasting messages.

                There is also one other factor: When Gillett and Hicks bought Liverpool, although they were using borrowed money the point was made that the debt was not being loaded on to the club and this was not the sort of borrowing the Glazers indulged in to buy Manchester United.

                The debt they had taken on had to be refinanced in February 2008, however, and, to keep the club going forward, it will continue to increase.

                Last autumn, as Hicks looked at alternative sources of money, he spoke to DIC about coming in as an investor but valued Liverpool at £1bn - a figure DIC think was in dreamland.

                That, however, was the cue for DIC to move again and, ever since then, a curious triangle has developed at Liverpool.

                There is the Gillett/Hicks partnership which has all but broken down. Gillett, frustrated by Hicks inability to keep away from the press, cannot it seems get away soon enough and has, I am told, agreed in principle to sell to DIC, if the price is right.

                Then there is DIC, which has cleared its decks and is keen and willing to buy the club but at what it considers a reasonable price.

                The third part of the triangle is the club in the shape of Moores, the former owner, and Rick Parry, the chief executive. Once they welcomed DIC, before selling to Gillett and Hicks. Now they hope the situation can be resolved and peace can return. It seems this replay will go to extra time before this can happen.

                http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/thereport...3/post_12.html
                Just believe and you never know what will happen.

                According to Benitez it's important not simply to go out to win but to go out prepared to win, which means players have to put in the same level of work on a daily basis. Anything else is unacceptable.

                Comment


                  that bose article,or a reworking of it has been poated about 5 times,do we ned to post it every few hours?
                  You two scousers are always yapping,I'm gonna show you some serious rapping.
                  I come from Jamaica,my name is John Barnes,When I do my thing the crowd go bananas.

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by DJS View Post
                    I'm just thinking...

                    Hicks & Gillett will (IMO) crack at something like £450m.

                    DIC's first official bid was £400m.

                    Nobody accepts anyone's first offer.

                    Nobody offers their limit with their first bid.

                    No?
                    Also if they up their offer by £50m, it's pure profit for our "owners", so would be very attractive.

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by Rafa Shankly View Post
                      that bose article,or a reworking of it has been poated about 5 times,do we ned to post it every few hours?
                      But what about if I paste the whole article in but then add a handshake at the bottom?

                      Surely that makes it a completely different piece of information
                      Gillett and Hicks are cunts

                      Comment


                        I sounds like everyone is getting a bit edgy now- settle down, no need to get moody yet

                        It is all rumours, and we are getting closer to an ending of all of this. The next week or so will be interesting to follow, and see how much longer the americans can hold up.

                        I am still happy that DIC remains fairly quiet on the matter, as it sort of confirms to me that they are still hopefull of a deal.

                        Comment


                          VERY interesting that there has been no official statement from Hicks though isnt it. If he wasnt discussing it he would issue a clear denial.... he hasnt.

                          Comment


                            This from the Financial Times today makes it look as though DIC are playing a long, patient game, and working hard at splitting the yanks.

                            DIC confident Liverpool bid will succeed
                            By Roger Blitz, Leisure Industries Correspondent
                            Published: March 5 2008 04:57 | Last updated: March 5 2008 04:57
                            Dubai International Capital believes it will still end up as the owner of Liverpool FC, in spite of one of the two US owners of the club turning down a £400m ($793m) offer.
                            The sovereign fund set Tom Hicks and George Gillett a deadline of midnight on Tuesday night for accepting its debt-inclusive offer, tabled last week.
                            The offer would leave each of them with a £25m profit on their takeover last year of the Premier League club.
                            Mr Hicks has rejected the offer and has made it clear that he would not countenance a 50-50 shareholding with anyone other than Mr Gillett. Under the terms of their co-ownership agreement, neither party can sell his stake to a third party without the approval of the other.
                            Mr Gillett is understood to view the DIC offer as undervaluing the club.
                            In spite of the apparent “take-it-or-leave-it” message behind its deadline, DIC is unlikely to walk away from Liverpool altogether.
                            DIC, which has been in contact with the owners and their advisers since last autumn, envisages a two-stage takeover, in which it buys out Mr Gillett and waits for Mr Hicks to sort out other financial affairs before taking full control of the club.
                            A representative for Mr Hicks declined to comment on whether he needed to retain his stake in Liverpool to underpin a planned flotation of his Hicks Sports Management group.
                            The fund, controlled by Dubai’s ruler Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid al-Maktoum, last year made a £219m offer for Liverpool but failed to reach an agreement with David Moores, the club’s former chairman, allowing the Hicks/Gillett consortium to step in to buy the club at the same price.
                            Sameer al-Ansari, chief executive of DIC, said earlier on Tuesday that talks were at a “sensitive stage”.
                            Speaking on the sidelines of a private equity conference in Dubai he said the owners had responded to the indicative offer. He added that one of them was showing signs that he could lower the valuation of the club.
                            Additional reporting by Simeon Kerr in Dubai

                            Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2008

                            Comment




                              Found a picture of Amanda Staveley, quite nice I think.

                              Comment


                                05/03/2008 09:02
                                Dubai Urge Fan Pressure To Force Americans Out



                                DIC believe they have the majority of popular support on their side, with most fans clearly unhappy with the current Anfield regime.

                                Nevertheless, Tom Hicks knocked back DIC's offer yesterday of £400m to buy the club, something that has enraged Sheikh Mohammed.

                                The message from the Emirates appears clear: a better off will not be made. It is believed that Gillett is more open to selling off his 50% stake in Liverpool, but Hicks is unwilling to work with DIC in any other position than with himself as a majority shareholder.

                                Gentlemen's Agreement

                                As reported previously, the Americans have an agreement whereby neither can sell up without the express consent of the other partner. For now, Hicks' refusal to play ball is threatening to scupper the Dubai deal, but Sheikh Mohammed is hoping that fan power might do the trick.

                                Hicks Protests 'Encouraged'

                                “Sheikh Mohammed is a Liverpool fan and wants the kudos of owning them - but not to make a profit," a source close to the consortium told The ***. “He’s prepared to let Hicks sweat in his own juices until he’s forced into doing a deal.”

                                DIC consider Gillett to be the more reasonable of the pair, hence they appear to be encouraging supporters to direct their anger at Texan businessman Hicks, who they feel is messing them around. Hicks was recently described by a leading member of the consortium as being 'in dreamland' having reportedly valued the club at £500m - twice what was paid for it last year.

                                Protests against both Americans have been common on the Kop during and after most of Liverpool's recent home games.

                                The New Directors?

                                Meanwhile, the Daily Telegraph report that DIC's £400m bid for the Reds is being fronted by 34-year-old businesswoman Amanda Staveley. The senior partner at PCP Capital Partners, the financial advisory firm chosen by DIC to lead the takeover attempt, she is a Cambridge University graduate who once dated Prince Andrew.

                                Should DIC achieve control of Anfield Staveley will be given a position on the Liverpool board, though sources close to her are keen to stress that the takeover is being driven by DIC's chief executive Sameer Al Ansari, a lifelong Reds fan.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X