Am I being pessimistic...or does anyone else think that its Chelseas Turn?

[Craig_H]

Whether you are right or wrong Syd, it's your condescending and patronising tone/attitude that gets peoples backs up.

Can't you just have a debate with Fredo without calling him deluded etc?

If he's being deluded, what other word should i use Neil? How do you make your point without actually using the words required? Genuinely asking here.

[Guest]

If he's being deluded, what other word should i use Neil? How do you make your point without actually using the words required? Genuinely asking here.

[Reece]

If he's being deluded, what other word should i use Neil? How do you make your point without actually using the words required? Genuinely asking here.

I'm Reece

You are constantly resorting to personal insults aimed at Fredo though. Disagree with him by all means (hec we all do!), but if you can't do so without calling him names and questioning his mental capacity, well I would suggest that shows up your limitations.

Just play nicely, otherwise you'll get banned again

[Neil Young]

What the **** are all you retards talking about, "laws of average"???? I'd hate to be the one to break it to you, but there's no such thing as laws of average. If I toss a coin 10 times and it comes up heads each time. then if I toss it again, the probability of gettin a heads is 1/2, same as every other time. The fact that we won the last times only boosts our chances of winning tonight, by giving us more confidence, and putting doubts in the chavs heads. Next time maybe you should do some research before posting a load of **** based on some made up mathematical hypothesis.

Thanks for enlightening us, the poor benighted ones.

Maybe next time you can give us a reason as to why anyone should pay attention to somebody who thinks calling people "retards" is somehow acceptable.

By the way, have you ever seen 'Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead'?

[Craig_H]

I'm Reece

You are constantly resorting to personal insults aimed at Fredo though. Disagree with him by all means (hec we all do!), but if you can't do so without calling him names and questioning his mental capacity, well I would suggest that shows up your limitations.

Just play nicely, otherwise you'll get banned again

So you are. Apologies.

It seems like the personal insults thing is only applicable for some people, because i get called all sorts and that's par for the course, naturally.

I was questioning his mental capacity because he made a comment befitting someone whose mental capacity warranted questioning

But in any case, i'll leave him to his padded cell

[Rich]

It's not unrealistic to suggest that when two closely matched sides play each other a few times, you wont get the same outcome every time.

That is a great rant; I'm guessing Victor is applying the strict Mathematical term of law of averages and he's (of course) correct!

[BFG]

****ing elders what do they know? Like anyone would have said no to Charlene, it really gets my goat.

[Craig_H]

That is a great rant; I'm guessing Victor is applying the strict Mathematical term of law of averages and he's (of course) correct!

I think it's Victor from BB, from a few years back...the 'alpha male', slick ghetto VIP

[Guest]

I'm Reece

You are constantly resorting to personal insults aimed at Fredo though. Disagree with him by all means (hec we all do!), but if you can't do so without calling him names and questioning his mental capacity, well I would suggest that shows up your limitations.

Just play nicely, otherwise you'll get banned again

He doesn't know how to 'tackle' me on a fair level. He just usually riles me up in order to force his POV. I'm his nemesis on here, and I never ever swear at people.

[Vermilion]

Law of averages, hmm, don't know about that, except in this twisted weird theory here, this is what i think will happen, we WILL beat the Chavs, comfortably, (we'll put that unbeaten home record to bed too), then as someone said, if averages played a part we would beat the scum more often.

So in light of that, i think all those times when the averages said it was our turn against the scum, well, they will all come home home to roost in the final, it will be our turn, in the most important gigantic game ever between the two clubs, it will be OUR turn.

Obviously i don't believe in things like superstition, or averages, it's just who's Luckiest on the day.

[Neil Young]

He doesn't know how to 'tackle' me on a fair level. He just have to rile me to force his POV. I'm his nemesis on here, and I never ever swear at people.

Oh f*ck off, fredo.

[dww]

What the **** are all you retards talking about, "laws of average"???? I'd hate to be the one to break it to you, but there's no such thing as laws of average. If I toss a coin 10 times and it comes up heads each time. then if I toss it again, the probability of gettin a heads is 1/2, same as every other time. The fact that we won the last times only boosts our chances of winning tonight, by giving us more confidence, and putting doubts in the chavs heads. Next time maybe you should do some research before posting a load of **** based on some made up mathematical hypothesis.

I think people should think about what the law means and learn some basic statistics. the "law of averages" is a perfectly acceptable lay hypothesis for the circumstances where a/ we are considering random events and b/ a large sample size. It is not something one can apply to any individual event with any meaning.

That said calling people retards is unacceptable and won't be tolerated in future.

[Reece]

He doesn't know how to 'tackle' me on a fair level. He just have to rile me to force his POV. I'm his nemesis on here, and I never ever swear at people.

That said though Fredo, when you get angry and are arguing a point, your English deteriorates considerably

[Craig_H]

I think people should think about what the law means and learn some basic statistics. the "law of averages" is a perfectly acceptable lay hypothesis for the circumstances where a/ we are considering random events and b/ a large sample size. It is not something one can apply to any individual event with any meaning.

That said calling people retards is unacceptable and won't be tolerated in future.

Emotionally challenged, is the term we should use.

[Guest]

Oh f*ck off, fredo.

Get lost you.

That said though Fredo, when you get angry and are arguing a point, your English deteriorates considerably