Originally posted by Greebo
View Post
I think the only thing which would lead to a cease fire here is either: the complete and utter capitulation of everyone to the Rafa can do no wrong POV, or; Rage (& others) getting what they want, which is clearly to see Rafa out of the door.
I for one, although I post rarely, am sick of reading the twisted and agenda ridden attacks on Rafa, along with some of the ridiculous name calling which goes on from both sides. I really do wonder why people bother to come on here with such bitter attitudes.
I posted some time ago why I believed that Rafa is the man for LFC. What I can't understand is why those who clearly have an agenda bother supporting the club at all. I can't recall ever feeling anything like the level of antipathy towards a manager of LFC that Rage & others seem to have for Rafa - with the notable exception of Souness - who really had done something to piss people off (the S*n exclusive).
So far all Rafa seems to have done to these people is to have bought an occasional dud, and not played the prettiest football they've ever seen. I can recall the last time we actually won the league (and about 16 seasons prior to that), and let me tell you, those who say the football was always fantastic, or that we steamrollered every other team we played, or that we never lost or had nervous moments or draws that should have been wins either have the rosiest tinted spectacles ever created, or only have their knowledge of the period from highlight DVDs and occasional players biographies. Sometimes we were awful, but ground out a result, sometimes we were untouchable but drew or lost to freak goals or Keeper MOMs and most of the time we were simply better than the opposition.
Rafa's way of playing seems to me to be closer to the Paisley/Fagan/Dalglish management eras than any other. He believes the entire team should attack and defend as a unit. So did Paisley et al. It used to be said that Ian Rush was our 1st line of defence.
Talking of sacking a manager who is not just trying to win as many trophies as he can for the Club, is building the club up for the future and investing heavily in youth players, but also comes across (to me at any rate) as a trhoroughly decent, conscientious, honest, and modest individual who has adopted the Club and the City (along with his clearly sensible and intelligent wife in support) seems to me to be at best bad manners, and at worst completely bonkers.



There, I've said what I wanted to get off my chest.
I for one, although I post rarely, am sick of reading the twisted and agenda ridden attacks on Rafa, along with some of the ridiculous name calling which goes on from both sides. I really do wonder why people bother to come on here with such bitter attitudes.
I posted some time ago why I believed that Rafa is the man for LFC. What I can't understand is why those who clearly have an agenda bother supporting the club at all. I can't recall ever feeling anything like the level of antipathy towards a manager of LFC that Rage & others seem to have for Rafa - with the notable exception of Souness - who really had done something to piss people off (the S*n exclusive).
So far all Rafa seems to have done to these people is to have bought an occasional dud, and not played the prettiest football they've ever seen. I can recall the last time we actually won the league (and about 16 seasons prior to that), and let me tell you, those who say the football was always fantastic, or that we steamrollered every other team we played, or that we never lost or had nervous moments or draws that should have been wins either have the rosiest tinted spectacles ever created, or only have their knowledge of the period from highlight DVDs and occasional players biographies. Sometimes we were awful, but ground out a result, sometimes we were untouchable but drew or lost to freak goals or Keeper MOMs and most of the time we were simply better than the opposition.
Rafa's way of playing seems to me to be closer to the Paisley/Fagan/Dalglish management eras than any other. He believes the entire team should attack and defend as a unit. So did Paisley et al. It used to be said that Ian Rush was our 1st line of defence.
Talking of sacking a manager who is not just trying to win as many trophies as he can for the Club, is building the club up for the future and investing heavily in youth players, but also comes across (to me at any rate) as a trhoroughly decent, conscientious, honest, and modest individual who has adopted the Club and the City (along with his clearly sensible and intelligent wife in support) seems to me to be at best bad manners, and at worst completely bonkers.



There, I've said what I wanted to get off my chest.







Comment