Stadium canned?

[Danish_Pastry]

G&H - do you remember your fake promisses to Chorintians - this farce is just another run along that road.

.... get off our LFC!!!!

[Leyton388]

**** i would rather stay at Anfield and have it fall apart around us than grounshare with the bitters

[bobbyfallon]

didnt think id ever say this but DIC cant come back quick enuf.

its beyond embarrassing now

what took over 100 of history and tradition to build has been wiped out in less than 2 years by these ****in muppetts - everton , villa , newcastle fans having a go at me about how embarrassing our club is etc. and with these two in charge its hard to disagree

[Leyton388]

Could we not just expand Anfield if the price of the ground is going up? I am sure it could be expanded to 60,000 as the centenary stand was build with a possible extra tier in the future and the Anfield road end could also be done.

[Rashid]

It can't be expanded due to local resident disapproval and due to our proximity to so many houses, the current site just couldn't cope e.g. we would need more space which we simply don't have.

[Dhav]

I wouldn't need to speak to either DIC or the Yanks to decide on who to pick. 10 seconds on Google tells me Hicks ****ed up Corinthians and then ran away, he is hated at Dallas Stars and their is a pressure group to get him out, niether of them have had much success on the pitch these past 10 years and both have leverage buy out history. And that's before we get into DIC - these two cunts should have been rejected on them being cunts alone. Moores should have kept it himself than sell to them - he could have used the "fit and proper" rule given their backhrounds.

No excuse mate.

Rash, do you know what the funny/ironic thing is, it's that Parry said the American bid became much more attractive when Hicks came on board!

This has been one royal **** up from the very beginning. Parry and Moores need to hang their heads in shame, while they are on the inside do all they can to get the yanks out, and then fall on their sword for what they sold this club into. You're right about Moores. He should have never sold to the yanks simply because they were the only party in town after him and Parry pissed off DIC. He should have taken responsibility for ****ing off DIC, and not just sold to the yanks to mask his incompetence and hope it would be ok.

I make no bones about it, I always wanted DIC, and knight in shining armour or not, there is no chance in hell they would have been as poor and irresponsible custodians as the yanks . Remember, DIC had some LFC genuine fans on board.

[Rashid]

I too wanted DIC and know back in November how much they wanted to come back in - that says a lot. In the meantime Arsenal, Man City, Newcastle have all tried to get them on board to no avail - they only want Liverpool. Gillett had Newcastle has his fall back option if LFC failed, he had already tried for Villa and was sent packing by Doug Ellis.

Our two clowns should have known all this but they didn't or they ignored it.

The only thing with DIC is that they are Arabs, and they won't have much patience, Rafa certainly won't be allowed to say a word publically about them, and he will be under a hell of a lot more pressure. The whole clube will change overnight under DIC.

[Exiled_red]

im just saying with hindsight its very easy to criticize, i remember full well that loads of fans on here had huge reservations about the dic takeover, especially when the supposed 7 year exit came to light, why then should moores feel any differently?

2 years on we all know it was the wrong decision, but all blame is at the lying cheating unscrupulous yanks door.

Moores undoubtedly made a mistake by selling to them, but he is not responsible for the damage these two have done to the club, that is down to them

[Leyton388]

it is crazy this is like me or any of you guys going over to America and buying say the Atlanta Braves or Dallas Cowboys and telling all the staff how those clubs should be run and how i know more about those sports than the people who are in the sport (for which i know **** all about) It is mind boggling to think that someone would act like that as it is business and sporting suicide.

I mean you don't see the Glazers telling Slur Alex and david Gill how the club and teams should be run and who they can and cannot sign because even though they are businessmen they know how not to **** up a multi million pound company.

How many time have you seen the Glazers going on Sky sports giving interviews and all that. Simple answer is you don't and since they have been at united that club has gone from strength to strength on the pitch as the know the only way to build a football club is on the pitch. Something which our own yanks know **** all about.

[Dhav]

it is crazy this is like me or any of you guys going over to America and buying say the Atlanta Braves or Dallas Cowboys and telling all the staff how those clubs should be run and how i know more about those sports than the people who are in the sport (for which i know **** all about) It is mind boggling to think that someone would act like that as it is business and sporting suicide.

I mean you don't see the Glazers telling Slur Alex and david Gill how the club and teams should be run and who they can and cannot sign because even though they are businessmen they know how not to **** up a multi million pound company.

How many time have you seen the Glazers going on Sky sports giving interviews and all that. Simple answer is you don't and since they have been at united that club has gone from strength to strength on the pitch as the know the only way to build a football club is on the pitch. Something which our own yanks know **** all about.

You make some very salient points. The Glazer example is a valid comparison, because they give the impression that they leave the day to day running of the club to Gill and it very much seems to work for them. On the other hand our American owners seem to be sticking their oar in to the general disharmony and detriment of the club.

The funny thing is, in an interview Gillett gave to the Canadian media the day after the takeover press conference at Anfield, Gillett said they (ie himself and Hicks) would not be in any way involved in the day to day running of the club and instead that would be left to Parry and Moores. Another broken promise.

[jrd7]

You make some very salient points. The Glazer example is a valid comparison, because they give the impression that they leave the day to day running of the club to Gill and it very much seems to work for them. On the other hand our American owners seem to be sticking their oar in to the general disharmony and detriment of the club.

The funny thing is, in an interview Gillett gave to the Canadian media the day after the takeover press conference at Anfield, Gillett said they (ie himself and Hicks) would not be in any way involved in the day to day running of the club and instead that would be left to Parry and Moores. Another broken promise.

The second they didn't qualify for CL, they would be sticking their noses in. They've got £50-60 mill interest to pay every year. Players would be sold, of that i've got no doubt.