Originally posted by fredo
View Post
No 
-
Okay well I've done it for you. -
It's a pity really - this started off as quite a good thread.
Fredo ruined it as usual..
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post.Comment
-
Originally posted by Big Dave View Post
I would rather our revenue streams were invested back into the club rather than RBS , but thats just me being greedy
Where do you think our transfer budget comes from? its not a magical pot of money that suddenly appears at the season.Brandt - Keita - Van Dijk - SessegnonComment
-
-
You should be grateful. That post made you look like a bit a of a ****. (which of course you are not)Originally posted by fredo View PostThat's illegally using your mod powers to edit posts.
Oh I don't know.Comment
-
.
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post.Comment
-
I don't care mate, this is the internet. I mean, look at Neil Young, he's a dog in here.Originally posted by dom9 View Post
I'm the anti-thesis in here,of what I actually am, I think.
Comment
-
Originally posted by fredo View PostI'm the anti-thesis in here,of what I actually am, I think.
The usual formulation is "I think therefore I am."
There's plenty of evidence that doesn't apply in your case..
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post.Comment
-
Usual formulations doesn't apply to me. I'm known to be one who refutes and spin all theories on their head.Originally posted by Neil Young View Post The usual formulation is "I think therefore I am."
There's plenty of evidence that doesn't apply in your case.
Comment
-
You're known to be one, that much is true.Originally posted by fredo View Post.
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post.Comment
-
Okay can we move on now please guys....Comment
-
-
Is there any way to stop fredo from PMing me? It's very unsettling.Originally posted by Reece View Post.
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post.Comment
-
-
More swearing. It's just not appropriate, fredo. Please desist..
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post.Comment
Comment