Would you sack Hodgson?

[Guest]

better than liverpool, mate your blind support of Rafa holds no bounds.

I realise that my piss taking is being taken seriously.

[red g]

I realise that my piss taking is being taken seriously.

oh sorry i didnt realise you were just on one big piss take

I apologise

your a funny guy.

[Guest]

oh sorry i didnt realise you were just on one big piss take

I apologise

your a funny guy.

I don't see where's the problem with a light hearted and ironic reply to someone who had a sly dig at me.

[SB]

I realise that my piss taking is being taken seriously.

Was this taking the piss too Fredo?

Originally Posted by PeteBest View Post
Not at all I just can't see myself supporting a club which is being owned by a pair of ****wits and a bunch of two faced servants serving their interests. There are moral grounds and principles that I would never trade for anything. It's my prerogative who I want to support or not and it shows that I care deeply for my club. Glory isn't the 'be all and end all' - this club is much more than that.

[Guest]

Was this taking the piss too Fredo?

Originally Posted by PeteBest View Post
Not at all I just can't see myself supporting a club which is being owned by a pair of ****wits and a bunch of two faced servants serving their interests. There are moral grounds and principles that I would never trade for anything. It's my prerogative who I want to support or not and it shows that I care deeply for my club. Glory isn't the 'be all and end all' - this club is much more than that.

I was referring to my reply to DannyMan. It's not really difficult to see.

[SB]

I was referring to my reply to DannyMan. It's not really difficult to see.

So answer the question if it's not difficult to see mate. What's clear is that you are a wind up.

[Chrono]

This is my new favourite thread

[Neil Young]

This is my new favourite thread

It's good but too light on sheds for me.

[Guest]

So answer the question if it's not difficult to see mate. What's clear is that you are a wind up.

No I'm not. If talking about Rafa is taken as winding up people, then there's something wrong in here.

[CJ]

It's good but too light on sheds for me.

have you thought of mixing your love of sheds and dogs and combining them into a love of wooden kennels ?

[Chrono]

[CJ]

ideal

[SB]

Was this taking the piss too Fredo?

Originally Posted by PeteBest View Post
Not at all I just can't see myself supporting a club which is being owned by a pair of ****wits and a bunch of two faced servants serving their interests. There are moral grounds and principles that I would never trade for anything. It's my prerogative who I want to support or not and it shows that I care deeply for my club. Glory isn't the 'be all and end all' - this club is much more than that.

No I'm not. If talking about Rafa is taken as winding up people, then there's something wrong in here.

Straight question for you Fredo. Just answer this for me please. Do you stand by these comments that you made right here or have you had time to reconsider. That's all.

[SB]

have you thought of mixing your love of sheds and dogs and combining them into a love of wooden kennels ?

http://www.urbanheritagesupplies.co....s/dog_shed.jpg

ideal

Not another attempt to hijack a thread is it Neil

[Guest]

Straight question for you Fredo. Just answer this for me please. Do you stand by these comments that you made right here or have you had time to reconsider. That's all.

If you look at my post in its entirety you'll see that I've also stated that 'it shows that I care deeply for my club'. Under the current ownership and based on the decisions that have been made (sacking Rafa and appointing Hodgson), I find it difficult to back the manager's appointment 100%. I've also stated that I'm prepared to hold my hands up if it turns out to be a successful appointment.

Is that a deliberate wind up? Or is it that people will nit pick what they want off my posts - I refer to the abuse been ditched at me by Operation.