Steve Nicol was class, massively underrated !
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Wigan
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
I'd agree with thisOriginally posted by danperkins View PostShaggy when did i say Johnson was a **** player? He is a **** defender. And Hansen and Dixon know more about the defensive side of the game than you, i or anyone on this site put together would ever hope to know. Not all pundits are the enemy and not everything is a witch hunt or an agenda. Paranoid Ramblings. Johnson has proven to be not a good defender throughout his career, great going forward but horrendous positional sense and defensive awareness. Hope for our sake that this can improve or we just blew 17 million quid, also if he is considered great going forward he'd want to be working more on getting assists too and increasing productivity going forward. Nobosy is saying he is a **** player per say just that he is not a good defender.
Hansen & Dixon are interesting to listen to about defensive systems and players
Talk bollocks about much of the rest of the game mindBob Paisley - "This club has been my life. I'd go out and sweep the street and be proud to do it for Liverpool if they asked me to."
Comment
-
Yes Kenny took the mickey out of him mercilessly when he was youngerOriginally posted by Shaggy View PostAnd notoriously thick too
He took no **** / prisoners when he was older though
There was one season that he was injured I think it was late 80's (had a bad back I think) and he was out for quite awhile. Rumour goes that he was only injured for part of that the other part he was banned from Melwood for "chinning" a so called "hard man" for calling him a cripple as he hobbled past the training pitch on his way to a physio sessionBob Paisley - "This club has been my life. I'd go out and sweep the street and be proud to do it for Liverpool if they asked me to."
Comment
-
Originally posted by Shaggy View PostIt's hyperbole IMO. He's obviously no Maldini and he obviously has weaknesses, but it's blown way, way out of proportion. If he was as bad as some like to try and make out, Capello wouldn't touch him with a bargepole. Ask yourself how many goals Johnson's so-called wank defending has cost us - the answer is not very many. Not very many at all.Originally posted by elrichio86 View PostDo those two not go hand in hand?
Johnson is an attacking fullback. And because of this there are going to be times when he is upfield, the attack breaks down and he is caught out of position. If you play an attacking fullback it is a given he will be caught out occaisionally. This is where your DM should be filling in that space when needed (something Masch was very good at).
Either you get a defensive fullback and lose the attacking option (e.g. Arbeloa) or you play an attacking fullback who gets caught out defensively. You can have both.
For years we'd been complaining about our lack of threats from fullback. We then get an attacking fullback and he just gets complaints defensively. Fickle?
It seems a bit too easy to fall into the punditry trap where Johnson is concerned.
He is without question an 'offensive fullback', and because he isn't Steve Nicol or Ashley Cole then his defensive ability gets scrutinised.
But I don't think that he is anywhere near as bad as some have said on here.
That said, he can't be in 2 places at once, which is why Mascherano was so crucial to the way we play. Not just a defensive midfielder, but one with explosive pace (off the mark anyway) and a terrier like ability to close and cover
He could make up for Johnson's forays or defensive frailties because he was so quick to see and counter dangerI saw a dead fish on the pavement and thought "what did you expect?"
There's no water round here stupid, should have stayed where it was wet
Comment
-
Originally posted by Fierce View Post
It seems a bit too easy to fall into the punditry trap where Johnson is concerned.
He is without question an 'offensive fullback', and because he isn't Steve Nicol or Ashley Cole then his defensive ability gets scrutinised.
But I don't think that he is anywhere near as bad as some have said on here.
That said, he can't be in 2 places at once, which is why Mascherano was so crucial to the way we play. Not just a defensive midfielder, but one with explosive pace (off the mark anyway) and a terrier like ability to close and cover
He could make up for Johnson's forays or defensive frailties because he was so quick to see and counter danger
I agree with the rest of the post too.
.
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post.
Comment
-
That's pure bull****. He's not an 'appalling' defender, an appalling defender doesnt get to be first choice for his country.Originally posted by Lecter View PostHes not a good defender, he a ****ing appalling defender
It's very easy for the most recent stuff to mask what's happened in the past. Johnson's been dire this season, i have no arguments with that.
But i'm not judging him on 10-15 games. I'm judging on what i've seen over his whole career, and he's generally a good defender. Not great, not world class defensively, but good. And going forward, he's one of the best in europe.
Originally posted by Shaggy View PostIt's hyperbole IMO. He's obviously no Maldini and he obviously has weaknesses, but it's blown way, way out of proportion. If he was as bad as some like to try and make out, Capello wouldn't touch him with a bargepole. Ask yourself how many goals Johnson's so-called wank defending has cost us - the answer is not very many. Not very many at all.
Bits in bold are spot on. Nobody would try to claim he hasnt been in woeful form this season, but that's exactly it, form. And yes, i agree that he needs to sort his head and concentration.Originally posted by Rudo View PostHave to say i've always thought Johnson was dodgy defensively, was ****ing staggered when we paid £17mil for him.
He soon won me over but even when he was tearing it up down the right flank, he was still getting caught out far too frequently defensively and this season, he's just been in horrific form. Even the biggest Glen Johnson fan would have to admit that.
It's not that he's totally ****, obviously he's a great asset for Liverpool and England when he's at his best but he needs to get his head sorted and start focusing during matches.
Last edited by Craig_H; 09-11-10, 02:19 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by elrichio86 View PostDo those two not go hand in hand?
Johnson is an attacking fullback. And because of this there are going to be times when he is upfield, the attack breaks down and he is caught out of position. If you play an attacking fullback it is a given he will be caught out occaisionally. This is where your DM should be filling in that space when needed (something Masch was very good at).
Either you get a defensive fullback and lose the attacking option (e.g. Arbeloa) or you play an attacking fullback who gets caught out defensively. You can have both.
For years we'd been complaining about our lack of threats from fullback. We then get an attacking fullback and he just gets complaints defensively. Fickle?
Yes yes yes, one million percent yes
Totally agree with every word here.
We always struggled to break teams down, struggled with width and creativity - and Johnson helped this. At the expense of the defensive side of things, yes. But as you say, what do people want?
You could probably count the number of fullbacks in the world who are great going forward and solid defensively, on one hand. Obvious example is Ashley Cole - how much would an Ashley Cole cost? If we could spare £30m for one of those, then great. But we obviously cant. The fact is, Johnson cost about HALF of what an Ashely Cole of the same age, would probably cost.
Comment
-
I said at the time, that Johnson was overpriced, and that we let Arbeloa go too cheap and wrongly. I know he was running down his contract, but as i said at the time, i value a year's worth of Arbeloa higher than the £3m or whatever it was we got for him. I still wanted Johnson, albeit overpriced, but i'd have kept Arbeloa too.Originally posted by Rudo View PostYou need to get the balance right between defending and attacking but obviously his first priority should be to defend and more often than not he doesn't do that well.
Give me Arbeloa over Johnson any day, i wouldn't call him too defensive either, he got forward well too. I wasn't his biggest fan actually although looking back now, he was a solid player for us come to think of it.
For different games, you have different needs and the pair of them would've had us nicely covered in terms of an attacking fullback and a more solid, less expansive version.
Comment
-
Which is exactly why you're on Johnson's back, because you only remember the recent stuff - and recently, he's been woefully out of form and dreadful.Originally posted by Lecter View PostOh ****ing do one
I can barely remember last week nevermind last year
I think he has but without re-watching every game again I couldnt give specifics
The lad is an appalling defender
Comment
-
So you've been able to point to two examples of such players, in 20 years.Originally posted by Lecter View PostI actually quite liked Arbeloa as an all round player and have said virtually that above
To me he wasnt brilliant at coming forward but he did a good enough job
Defensively he was far far superior to Johnson
To me it doesnt have to be all or nothing Steve Nicol was brilliant at doing both (probably the best I've seen at Liverpool and probably one of the most underrated British fullbacks ever), Babbel was also extremely good at doing both, Arbeloa had a nice balance also and I think Kelly will be able to do both
Perhaps they're not exactly ten a penny, but actually quite hard to find.
Comment
Comment