i am too. well of religion anyway.
-
dave of mutilation
-
Sorry, I didn't mean that.
I just mean I'm spelled the other way around..
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post.Comment
-
.
dave of mutilationComment
-
It does seem ****ing serious around here at the moment.Comment
-
Which is the more dogmatic, the religious or the atheist?Comment
-
It's like I set them up.Originally posted by little dave hedgehog View Post.
But I don't, I just make them up as I go along.
.
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post.Comment
-
.
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post.Comment
-
-
-
.
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post.Comment
-
Originally posted by BobTheCharmer View Post
I'd rather not have him, even if it means winning. For me it's ratting out on a set of principles. If you rat and you win, have you really won? And if you rat and you lose, you've lost everything.
Experimental music, Metropolitan foodstuffs, Mexican wrestler art, London suburbia, wry whimsy, fansy pants flim flam ladComment
-
F*ck that, I want our best players to play for us.
Assuming he stays...
Yes, he's acted like a git but if he knuckles down and Rodgers brings him back and he performs then that's fine by me.
It's not like we've sold our souls to some Russian billionaire gangster or become a front for a repressive, elitist, undemocratic Middle East regime. All that's happened is one of our players has behaved badly towards the club and and the club has won.
Player tries to break contract. Player loses. Club wins.
.
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post.Comment
-
Agreed about the vile opposition regimes, but I can't get behind someone like Suarez either. I'm not too bothered about the transfer chicanery but the racist and handshake fiasco, the hollow apologies and the biting was enough for me. I'll never get behind him. I'd rather not win than win with him in.Experimental music, Metropolitan foodstuffs, Mexican wrestler art, London suburbia, wry whimsy, fansy pants flim flam ladComment
-
All footballers are cheats, it's just that our best player is foreign and the press don't like the look of him. He is a cunt, but for now he's still our cunt.Comment
-
If he does play for us again I'd stick him either side of Sturridge who deserves the main central striking role in my eyes with how he performed last year plus he will more than likely lead the line for the first 6 games of the season and with any luck banged in a few goals.Kurtangled in the McFadden thread 16/01/08
Comment
Comment