LFC future strategy

[little dave hedgehog]

the best part is the lack "off" punctuation.

[Liverpool]

Havent read the article just looked at the charts and some of them look to far away from the truth.

If the Fulham Europa league run to the final revenue is true its not loss not being in it next year.

[WarrenB]

They haven't spent £100trn in the transfer market yet so they must be leveraged buy out merchants in disguise only in it for the money afterall what have they done for us nothing they only spent the money they got from the sale of Torres on Carroll and Suarez and don't foget Babel if they really mean business they'd have been in for aguero but they weren't i say we treat them with kid gloves i'll back them when they open there wallets. ynwa.

It's not up to FSG to make a move for Aguero.

[Neil Young]

Are you Warren Buffett?

[Tatterdemalion]

It's not up to FSG to make a move for Aguero.

I would like to point out that my post was tongue in cheek . I know about punctuation etc.

[The_weatherman]

This is not surprising really, not sure what it tells us either

[Shaggy]

That's depressing.

[The_weatherman]

That's depressing.

Yeah, sure is. But there is not much change needed to bring about huge changes there. We've already gotten rid of Hodgson, now we need to get rid of Poulsen, Cole, Jova, Konk, Jones and Aquilani. Sorted

[CJ]

This is not surprising really, not sure what it tells us either

it tells us we pay alot of money relative to were we finished. Chelseas position is shocking if you consider they finished second. oh and you only win the league by spending money.

[TheStig]

it tells us we pay alot of money relative to were we finished. Chelseas position is shocking if you consider they finished second. oh and you only win the league by spending money.

Been reading a book called "Why England Lose," written by a sports economist and football writer. They found (looking over 30 years of data or something) that league finishing position is 90% based on total salary to players; not manager or player transfer fees.

[little dave hedgehog]

Been reading a book called "Why England Lose," written by a sports economist and football writer. They found (looking over 30 years of data or something) that league finishing position is 90% based on total salary to players; not manager or player transfer fees.

liverpool love to buck a trend

[CJ]

hasnt tomkins been saying the same as well?

[Vermilion]

Wow, does that mean if Blackpool had put all their players on 200 grand a week they'd have won the league ?

[Mostar]

it tells us we pay alot of money relative to were we finished. Chelseas position is shocking if you consider they finished second. oh and you only win the league by spending money.

No real surprises that we are at the bottom, which is why we need to get rid of all deadwood we have, but I find it interesting that 3 of our big competitors are in the bottom 5 so we are certainly not the only one who need some squad changes.

[CJ]

No real surprises that we are at the bottom, which is why we need to get rid of all deadwood we have, but I find it interesting that 3 of our big competitors are in the bottom 5 so we are certainly not the only one who need some squad changes.

if you go with the theory that those who spend the most tend to win the league thats what you would expect isnt it?

obviously only one team can win the leauge but you would expect the ones wanting to win the league would be around the bottom.