Dear Guest
Thank you for visiting! est189 will soon be closing its doors (do forums have doors?) please visit the following thread - (to wail & cry perhaps?)
https://www.est1892.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?p=4002484#post4002484
Thanjk you.
Paul.S
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Liverpool FC bring Sharon Tuff on board as the club seeks global partnerships
The difference is that dancers at titty bars are promoting themselves as providers of sexual entertainment and judging an appearance, or sexual attractiveness is somewhat more legitimate than judging a business womans appearance. By somewhat I of course mean substantially more legitimate.
Surely you see the difference. If you want to be stubborn and keep arguing you really need better lines that Gary Glitter shagging kids because they have a lower age of consent in that country, and strip clubs?
Are we all really being honest here? Methinks only a few people are daring to be
Excluding the exempt perving thread
i've overstepped the mark plenty of times. it happens. i just try not to get carried away with it, and i understand afterwards why i probably shouldn't have said anything.
Ha ha ha ha this is a FOOTBALL website - this is a FOOTBALL thread about LFC management but your talking about what her TITS POSSIBLY look like... Yeah people are going to think this is sexist!! You might not mean it to be - which is kind of my point but it is what it is!!!
As a woman I'm not offended - but it shouldn't stop me challenging your view - it's just the way it is!!
Cheers
Rach
. Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
Take a moment to have a look at @everydaysexism on twitter. It is a project where people worldwide are sharing their experiences of everyday sexism and it really is quite an eye-opener.
The vast majority of the submissions are from women and they range from rude and ill-mannered behaviour to illegal stuff like being groped on public transport or lewd comments being shouted in the street. I was quite shocked because firstly it would never occur to me to behave that way and secondly, how many (effectively) sex-offenders go unpunished.
I'm not equating the comments on this thread with that kind of behaviour but I'm guessing that the people making them are not aware of what their sisters, daughters, wives, girlfriends etc etc are having to endure.
. Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
Ha ha ha ha this is a FOOTBALL website - this is a FOOTBALL thread about LFC management but your talking about what her TITS POSSIBLY look like... Yeah people are going to think this is sexist!! You might not mean it to be - which is kind of my point but it is what it is!!!
As a woman I'm not offended - but it shouldn't stop me challenging your view - it's just the way it is!!
Cheers
Rach
For you Rach...
[ame="http://vimeo.com/54742960"]Robbie Fowler - Hat Trick on Vimeo[/ame]
I could not dig, I dared not rob:
Therefore I lied to please the mob.
Now all my lies are proved untrue
And I must face the men I slew.
What tale shall serve me here among
Mine angry and defrauded young?
Yeah? I'd hardly call it a debate. That would require people to respond to what someone else has said with something more than a self-pitying defence of their own behaviour.
. Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
Yeah? I'd hardly call it a debate. That would require people to respond to what someone else has said with something more than a self-pitying defence of their own behaviour.
No point debating something you decided you were right about long ago
Comment