A couple of observations.
Klopp is getting a hard time, but had Countinho not been ill obviously that sub wouldn't have been made, but agreed i ****ing hate 5 at the back. Not just for us, any team that plays it boils my piss... it's been hard to accept that Chelsea have been successful with it but they've got the key personal in the right places - we don't.
Klopp made overtures about winning ugly, but that's not one of strengths and last night showed it. So i'd say from the interview afterwards that particular experiment is in the bin. Makes sense logically that if you don't have creative players rely on the defenders... the caveat is last night we had Klavan and Mignolet who are a long way short of quality for this.
It wasn't a disaster last night (defending aside
), we showed more attacking nous that the abysmal **** we dished up in Mane's absence in January. And at least Can, Coutinho and Divock look like their on form which they weren't then. Best to leave on a positive, right.
Klopp is getting a hard time, but had Countinho not been ill obviously that sub wouldn't have been made, but agreed i ****ing hate 5 at the back. Not just for us, any team that plays it boils my piss... it's been hard to accept that Chelsea have been successful with it but they've got the key personal in the right places - we don't.
Klopp made overtures about winning ugly, but that's not one of strengths and last night showed it. So i'd say from the interview afterwards that particular experiment is in the bin. Makes sense logically that if you don't have creative players rely on the defenders... the caveat is last night we had Klavan and Mignolet who are a long way short of quality for this.
It wasn't a disaster last night (defending aside
), we showed more attacking nous that the abysmal **** we dished up in Mane's absence in January. And at least Can, Coutinho and Divock look like their on form which they weren't then. Best to leave on a positive, right.




Comment