Dear Guest
Thank you for visiting! est189 will soon be closing its doors (do forums have doors?) please visit the following thread - (to wail & cry perhaps?)
https://www.est1892.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?p=4002484#post4002484
Thanjk you.
Paul.S
Don't we have van den Berg flying out, so problem solved
The only gracious way to accept an insult is to ignore it; if you can't ignore it, top it; if you can't top it, laugh at it; if you can't laugh at it, it's probably deserved.
With the speed Van Den Burg travels he'll be there by boxing day. Hopefully.
VvD's absence should be less noticeable hopefully without Lallana on the pitch and TAA, Mane, Firmino and Salah all giving the flamingos cause to use both legs.
Virg probably just has the ****s from some dodgy local street food. He'll be ok in a day or so
"When a man insults my country I insult him, by taking his woman" Tony Yeboah
"looking through your posts since 2007 and what you have consistently written about my football team I have come to the conclusion that if you had 1 more brain cell you would be a plant .. your father was a hamster and your mother smells of elder berries, I fart in your general direction ..." Nicey
If we were looking to dip VVD out this was the game to do it.
Its a good job our front 3 have been ok so far and Origi/Shaqiri back in.
Midfield is looking thin we'd be goosed if we needed Keita/AOC up top.
Could we sign a CB on loan in Jan for a month from a league with a winter break or someone out of favour?
We'll be fine for now.
Matip should be back in the next few weeks and I assume Lovren as well. If we go for anybody on loan, it would be for an emergency, ie Gomez or Virgil picking up an injury.
That's what I would have thought. Does the knock he took against Villa keep him out
The only gracious way to accept an insult is to ignore it; if you can't ignore it, top it; if you can't top it, laugh at it; if you can't laugh at it, it's probably deserved.
Maybe we just wanted to rest him but didn’t want to give the impression we were taking the opposition lightly or not taking the competition serious enough? It’s possible.
Maybe we just wanted to rest him but didn’t want to give the impression we were taking the opposition lightly or not taking the competition serious enough? It’s possible.
I think this is spot on. It was the only realistic game he could rest him.
Maybe we just wanted to rest him but didn’t want to give the impression we were taking the opposition lightly or not taking the competition serious enough? It’s possible.
We wouldn't choose to stop him training altogether though. I think it's genuine.
If you need to rest a player you do it, there's no need to create an excuse.
Comment