God imagine if they actually have faked it.
-
-
I thought they were just gonna make the audio public, not just send it to the club. In that case, they should be asking for the whole matches audio, not just the incident. There could be something incriminating at another time which explains why they made the ‘mistake’I don't tipComment
-
They must know we are not the clubs to try that on, some of our fans will be able to match the crowd noise picked up by the ref's mic to determine if it was actually taken from that match and at the right timeOriginally posted by Pablo View Post
Also if they got found out they would really really be in the ****
The only gracious way to accept an insult is to ignore it; if you can't ignore it, top it; if you can't top it, laugh at it; if you can't laugh at it, it's probably deserved.Comment
-
Originally posted by Mr Pink View Post
Nothing to hide and it will inform us as to when the ref knew from VAR that a mistake had been made & also what was said around the Jones red card.
We are here for a good time not a long time....Comment
-
Former SYP Sargent Webb? Anything is possible sadly.Originally posted by Exiled_red View PostThey must know we are not the clubs to try that on, some of our fans will be able to match the crowd noise picked up by the ref's mic to determine if it was actually taken from that match and at the right time
Also if they got found out they would really really be in the ****We are here for a good time not a long time....Comment
-
I'm willing to bet that everyone posting "stop crying" and "it happens to all of us, get over it" are Tory voters.
It's the only way to explain their boot licking lack of solidarity to improve the game for all clubs.Was muß, das muß.Comment
-
Liverpool vs PGMOL: What do the club hope to achieve after VAR row?
By James Pearce
2h ago
Almost 72 hours after Liverpool’s contentious defeat to Tottenham Hotspur, the fallout rumbles on.
A review is underway into the errors that led to Luis Diaz’s goal being disallowed for offside, with VAR Darren England and assistant VAR Dan Cook, who failed to overturn the on-field decision after replays showed the Colombian was onside, having been left off the list of officials for the next round of Premier League matches.
Referees’ governing body PGMOL have sent Liverpool the audio of the exchanges from Sunday between referee Simon Hooper and those in the VAR room at Stockley Park, which the club will now review.
In a strongly worded statement on Sunday, Liverpool argued that sporting integrity had been “undermined” and said they would “explore the range of options available, given the clear need for escalation and resolution”.
But what did Liverpool hope to achieve with that statement and what kind of resolution would satisfy them? The Athletic has contacted a number of senior figures at the club — who spoke on the condition of anonymity to protect their positions — to get a clearer idea of the answers to those questions.
Do they want a replay?
No. Liverpool fully accept the outcome of Saturday’s game. They lost 2-1 following Joel Matip’s own goal deep into stoppage time having been reduced to nine men following red cards for Curtis Jones and Diogo Jota. That’s not going to change. Despite all the noise on social media, there’s been no demand for the match to be replayed and there won’t be one.
So, what do they want?
Liverpool want a transparent investigation into the procedural failings so lessons are learned going forward.
Their immediate priorities are to establish what form the review will take, who will oversee it and what role the Premier League will play in it. The audio should provide a clearer understanding into how and why Diaz’s goal was disallowed.
They want to know why the decision was taken so quickly and why there was no intervention when the mix-up quickly became apparent.
Is their anger directed at Darren England?
No. In their statement, Liverpool attempted to move the focus away from the VAR himself and they weren’t happy with PGMOL blaming “significant human error”.
Liverpool insist their focus is on the process rather than the individual. The laws of the game were not applied and the correct outcome wasn’t reached due to a failure of VAR protocolsComment
-
Originally posted by Cerbie View Post
Have no idea what that 4th official is actually for??? Sub ref just in case the ref gets injured surely but they basically act as a mini therapist to managers as well during the game.
****in useless cuntsComment
-
-
Originally posted by Fosterbloke View Post
It’s not really mate.
Fans who get their dopamine from keeping up with the online gossip just have an engrained tribal mindset and think being a fan means 1-upping at all costs.. sure there’ll be plenty of overlap but your comment is a bit simplistic and also displays the same energy as the people you’re complaining about.Hello mert.Comment
-
Do they have a video showing the VAR room? They always show it before the game starts, I wonder if that could be used as well to check how it all went down. Not sure if it would show anything significant unless they weren’t actually paying attention to the game or even leave the room for some reason.Comment
-
This is remarkable.
[ame]https://twitter.com/BassTunedToRed/status/1709209746153095632[/ame]
301 games since then. 301 games without anyone getting a 2nd yellow against us. 444 yellows, 0 2nd yellows. Every other club has had between 5-15 players sent off against them for two yellows in that time.Thanks very much for being ‘This Mornings’ Farmer’Comment
-
Comment
-
Originally posted by Shaggy View PostThis is remarkable.
301 games since then. 301 games without anyone getting a 2nd yellow against us. 444 yellows, 0 2nd yellows. Every other club has had between 5-15 players sent off against them for two yellows in that time.
Impossible to claim “that’s just how the cards have landed lads, sorry but suck it up”
I wonder how many fouls Mo suffered in the same period that weren’t given from players already on a yellow. For that time range, it’s got to be close to a hundred?Hello mert.Comment
-
Holy ****. That's insaneOriginally posted by Shaggy View PostThis is remarkable.
301 games since then. 301 games without anyone getting a 2nd yellow against us. 444 yellows, 0 2nd yellows. Every other club has had between 5-15 players sent off against them for two yellows in that time.
What's also insane is Ben Foster's comments on the matter alluding to Sky being in cahoots with PGMOL
Its on that Manc weirdo's page who has been refreshingly damning about the whole thing, despite it being about the thing he hates most in the world -
And no, of course I don't know how to embed thisI saw a dead fish on the pavement and thought "what did you expect?"
There's no water round here stupid, should have stayed where it was wetComment
Comment