Jürgen Klopp

[BobTheCharmer]

Tetchy ****er.

[labourRed]

[ame]https://twitter.com/Chris78Williams/status/1646879703146418178[/ame]

It's going to end ugly which is sad. Part of this is on Klopp though, he definitely could've dug the owners out more than he did. In fact, he never really did, at all - he went at length to back our approach.

[Doc_Piptorious]

I liked the bit where he told a journo he was going to tear his head off and **** down his neck.


Some **** about not buying kids a ferrari for Xmas too.

[Doc_Piptorious]

[ame="https://youtu.be/m8Ai3PIbW3Q"]https://youtu.be/m8Ai3PIbW3Q[/ame]


The difference between what was actually said and the bull**** artist "journo" crying on twitter claiming Klopp lost the plot is night and day.

[Mark79]

[ame]https://twitter.com/Chris78Williams/status/1646995579036225536[/ame]

[Norbs]

What's the embargo?

[Mark79]

What's the embargo?

The video above

[Harv]

Would be classic butthurt journo ****.

Im all for Klopp tearing them all a new one.

[Corndog]

He doesn’t tear them a new one though.

The journalists ask him really stupid questions that aren’t clear and then when they clarify them, he’s taken a back because they are so obvious.

He genuinely at times is trying to understand what the question is because he doesn’t believe it needs to be asked.

E.g why does he have to explain the concept of a budget to them

[Norbs]

The video above

What section of the conference do they diacuss it, I didn't listen to the whole thing

[Rafa Justice]

https://twitter.com/Chris78Williams/...95579036225536

Looks like censorship in full effect. 18 mins trimmed to 13 mins.

[Doc_Piptorious]

Looks like censorship in full effect. 18 mins trimmed to 13 mins.

And yet the "offended" journalist still cannot come out himself and back up what was supposedly said to him.

His entire arguement is Klopp exploded at the presser and abused him in front of everyone during the presser, yet he nor anyone else seem to be able to say what was said other than claim Klopp spent the entire presser ranting.

Then when he is called on it he suddenly starts claiming the presser was 18 minutes long.

He basically wants to slag Klopp off and accuse Klopp of saying stuff yet does not have to prove his own side of it at all.

Do find it funny that it has gone from Klopp ranting for the entire presser to now it being Klopp ranting for the bit Williams claims is missing.

[Kenneth]

Nobody claimed it was the entire press conference. The video being shared is from BeanymanSports, who have also said that there is stuff missing:
[ame]https://twitter.com/BeanymanSports/status/1647020013373489153[/ame]

That nobody will say is likely more symptomatic of the client journalism established by the press conference format and access, heightened by the refusal to talk to particular reporters recently.

We don't know what was said, but assuming it was trivial or just an embittered journo is as baseless as any other interpretation.

[Paul12]

1 In that clip Jurgen was incredibly patient in the face of some really daft questions. The "You could go to a club with lots of money and then you could spend lots of money, so aren't you unhappy at Liverpool" line of questionning was particularly stupid. So, if there is a bit at the beginning or at the end where he spoke less patiently, I think that reflects more on the journalists than Jurgen.

2 I understand what an embargoed press conference is as a concept, but I don't understand why part of a press conference with a football manager would be embargoed. Could someone explain. Is it permanently embargoed - ie to give journalists background but no quotes? A deep background sort of interview - or is it embargoed until a later date - so that one press conference can feed two days of papers? And does showing the above clip break the embargo? Just very curious.

[Doc_Piptorious]

1 In that clip Jurgen was incredibly patient in the face of some really daft questions. The "You could go to a club with lots of money and then you could spend lots of money, so aren't you unhappy at Liverpool" line of questionning was particularly stupid. So, if there is a bit at the beginning or at the end where he spoke less patiently, I think that reflects more on the journalists than Jurgen.

2 I understand what an embargoed press conference is as a concept, but I don't understand why part of a press conference with a football manager would be embargoed. Could someone explain. Is it permanently embargoed - ie to give journalists background but no quotes? A deep background sort of interview - or is it embargoed until a later date - so that one press conference can feed two days of papers? And does showing the above clip break the embargo? Just very curious.

The highlighted bit.

It in theory means nobody can give a "version" of the press conference within moments of it ending. The idea being everyone present then has time to report what was said in an acurate manner and publish hours or a day or so later.

The reality is that that "dead air" period is often now used to try and create news where there is no news.