Is everyone agreed that it is a bad thing or do some people feel that we should look to have the best spectacle, the fastest runner/cyclists, highest jumpers or whatever?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Drugs in sport
Collapse
X
-
Guest -
It's cheating because thats the way the rules are set up surely? If everyone was allowed to do it then it would not be gaining an unfair advantage.Originally posted by fredo View PostBad thing ... It's cheating. Shouldn't be accepted in any sport whatsoever.
I tend to find drug use a distasteful idea but I'm not sure there is a very solid practical/factual basis for my opinion."The man who never alters his opinion is like standing water, and breeds reptiles of the mind."
-- William Blake
Comment
-
It is a tough question, the obvious answer should be that drugs are a form of cheating and should be banned as sport should remain "pure" and that the people we see perform are exactly the same as you or I, the only reason why they are there is due to their talent and hard-work.
Problem is though that 99% of athletes now take some form of supplements, so already they are getting preferential treatment - why aren't these also banned?James Philip Milner Fanclub #1
Curtis Julian Jones Fanclub #1
Comment
-
if steroids or enhanced drugs can be used to help injuries then im all for it. but ***** that take dope to gain the competitive edge need to be reigned in"People from Liverpool have got something about them and, if they’re not happy about something, they let people know.”
Jamie Carragher 15/1/2008
Comment
-
Guest
No, there's not.Originally posted by dww View PostIt's cheating because thats the way the rules are set up surely? If everyone was allowed to do it then it would not be gaining an unfair advantage.
I tend to find drug use a distasteful idea but I'm not sure there is a very solid practical/factual basis for my opinion.
The rules are obviously not set up this way, it's the perceived 'results only' perspective and the fact that money and prestige also that's in it which drives competitors to gain an unfair advantage. There was a case where the use of 'creatine' was doubted and I remember Wenger being involved in it some years ago ... Creatine has been since 'authorized' and deemed legal ...
Comment
-
Originally posted by dww View PostIt's cheating because thats the way the rules are set up surely? If everyone was allowed to do it then it would not be gaining an unfair advantage.
I tend to find drug use a distasteful idea but I'm not sure there is a very solid practical/factual basis for my opinion.
But if they're allowed the most money will buy the best drugs.
That definately does not leave everyone on the same playing field. Infact, with a Lottery win, I could enter the 100m and give Linford Christie the finger as I trot passed him
Well, here we are in a room with two manky hookers and a racist dwarf. I think I'm heading home.
Comment
-
I can just see it now, we allow drugs into sport and next thing the Pole Vault is sponsored by viagra.Originally posted by fredo View PostNo, there's not.
The rules are obviously not set up this way, it's the perceived 'results only' perspective and the fact that money and prestige also that's in it which drives competitors to gain an unfair advantage. There was a case where the use of 'creatine' was doubted and I remember Wenger being involved in it some years ago ... Creatine has been since 'authorized' and deemed legal ...
La tristesse durera toujours
Comment
-
We studied this in some depth at uni and had lectures from the old DDR sport institute in Leipzig. The conclusion was that there are few competitive sports where the current world records can be proven to have been acheived by drug free athletes. The current world womens hammer record holder is under scrutiny here in Germany due to her massive improvements. Personally I find it dishonest but the amount of spectacle in sport sadly dictates that atheletes, trainers, governing bodies and governments all collude to allow doping to continue.up your bum
Comment


Comment