Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The Wrestling Thread

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Keyser Soze
    replied
    Job out Adrian Neville in his second match he didn't even look strong.
    They could have made him an instant star by giving him a "fluke" victory or an Orton assisted victory.

    Leave a comment:


  • Alex
    replied
    Im sure there is always a lull after Wrestlemania and they pick up again when it comes to the UK. Only natural isnt it.

    Leave a comment:


  • MrShawnMichaels
    replied
    The bloom is already off the rose on Raw. Plus ca change as we are getting more Kane and the Big Show! YAY! Raw was largely miss-able, they didn't bother because of the NCAA finals going head to head with the show.

    Anyone watch Invasion Attack on Saturday? Ibushi is finally looking like a top top star.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bender
    replied
    I think Rollins is brilliant and reminds me in many ways of Rick Rude from wrestling skills to on screen character,i like Reigns but seems he's as is the general opinion not ready yet.Oh and The wwe needs Lesnar so it's good that he signed a new deal

    Leave a comment:


  • MrShawnMichaels
    replied
    Apparently Vince was always adamant that Reigns was going to win on Sunday. He was going to be the guy who beat the guy who conquered the streak - this stems from last Mania. But I think they hugely overestimated Reigns' ability and it was apparent, even to the most ardent and stubborn of followers, that Reigns isn't ready yet. He would have been surrounded by a sea of boos, especially against the biggest babyface in the company - Brock Lesnar. You can guarantee there is no chance Vince would have wanted his Mania ending that way.
    From a booking standpoint, Rollins makes complete logical sense as he is far more ready than Reigns is currently. It's just a shame he's lumbered with Big Show and Kane. Imagine if they had Cesaro and Harper in that role (maybe too ROH/PWG-rrific with Mercury, Noble and Rollins in there), how much fresher it would have been and it would have got two solid younger guys working against Reigns, Orton, Bryan etc.

    Leave a comment:


  • MrMichael
    replied
    Yup, the way they muted the extreme booing at Reign's entrance was far too obvious and a bit jarring for me.

    Having watched the whole show now, it definitely had a proper Wrestlemania feel, much more than I expected from the card. Pretty much agree with MrSM's comments on it, I wasn't a fan of Sting v HHH at all, partly for all the ****ery completely disregarding 2 decades of wrestling history and partly I guess because I've been used to watching Sting in the ring in recent years. I also hated the outcome, which ruins much chance of them doing anything else credible with Sting really.

    The main event was very well executed, extremely predictable that Rollins would cash in but it was booked as well as they possibly could have managed and they do deserve credit for that. The rest of the card was well put together and generally decent, I have seen better individual matches but they were mostly entertaining and the whole programme had a good pace about it.

    Leave a comment:


  • Doc_Piptorious
    replied
    Originally posted by Alex View Post
    I think wayyyyy to much attention is paid to backstage stuff now. It was just a nice moment they tried to put together. Landed for 95% and the other 5% cant look past what they think it is. Trouble is the 5% are just as loud as the other 95%

    Its no different to arguing in the football forums about player contracts. No one knows the full extent of things, so why concern yourself with them.

    I get more bothered by people booing John Cena and stuff. The guy clearly has put hard hours in to entertain people. But the 30 somethings in the crowd who dont like him skew the reactions for him. Wrestling Crowds can elevate a show like Wrestlemania which I thought they did on Sunday. But sometimes they can totally ruin the story that is trying to be told.

    I think that Main event was always going to happen like that, its had seeds sown for months. But I have read things online where fans are saying 'We made that happen' Just because they pushed it to happen last year, they now think they can control the story.

    Also. Rollins = Edge and I like that tremendously.


    To be honest I think that the days of wrestling crowds genuinely elevating live events for those watching on tv are winding down thanks to the manipulation of crowd mics that is becoming more and more common.

    Actual crowd reactions are being toned down or amplified based on what the company wants to promote, and when it is being done in an obvious manner it tends to take from what is happening.

    Leave a comment:


  • MrShawnMichaels
    replied
    Looks like they weren't impressed with the crowd on Monday. The crowd mics were completely turned down during the Divas match and the main event. Started with 'You Suck Cena' to Nikki Bella and moved onto the various Divas participating in the match.

    Leave a comment:


  • Doc_Piptorious
    replied
    Originally posted by MrShawnMichaels View Post
    My thoughts on Mania


    Found myself nodding along to most of that.

    When I saw the line up I was extremely underwhelmed and was expecting very little from W31.

    But many of the pairings that I was expecting to stink actually entertained, and whilst a few things sat wrong for me (DX, NWO, Rollins/Orton) it was a solid show for the most part

    Leave a comment:


  • MrShawnMichaels
    replied
    My thoughts on Mania

    Leave a comment:


  • MrShawnMichaels
    replied
    Originally posted by Alex View Post
    I think wayyyyy to much attention is paid to backstage stuff now. It was just a nice moment they tried to put together. Landed for 95% and the other 5% cant look past what they think it is. Trouble is the 5% are just as loud as the other 95%

    Its no different to arguing in the football forums about player contracts. No one knows the full extent of things, so why concern yourself with them.

    I get more bothered by people booing John Cena and stuff. The guy clearly has put hard hours in to entertain people. But the 30 somethings in the crowd who dont like him skew the reactions for him. Wrestling Crowds can elevate a show like Wrestlemania which I thought they did on Sunday. But sometimes they can totally ruin the story that is trying to be told.

    I think that Main event was always going to happen like that, its had seeds sown for months. But I have read things online where fans are saying 'We made that happen' Just because they pushed it to happen last year, they now think they can control the story.

    Also. Rollins = Edge and I like that tremendously.
    Are you Paul Levesque?

    Leave a comment:


  • Alex
    replied
    I think wayyyyy to much attention is paid to backstage stuff now. It was just a nice moment they tried to put together. Landed for 95% and the other 5% cant look past what they think it is. Trouble is the 5% are just as loud as the other 95%

    Its no different to arguing in the football forums about player contracts. No one knows the full extent of things, so why concern yourself with them.

    I get more bothered by people booing John Cena and stuff. The guy clearly has put hard hours in to entertain people. But the 30 somethings in the crowd who dont like him skew the reactions for him. Wrestling Crowds can elevate a show like Wrestlemania which I thought they did on Sunday. But sometimes they can totally ruin the story that is trying to be told.

    I think that Main event was always going to happen like that, its had seeds sown for months. But I have read things online where fans are saying 'We made that happen' Just because they pushed it to happen last year, they now think they can control the story.

    Also. Rollins = Edge and I like that tremendously.

    Leave a comment:


  • MrMichael
    replied
    I would have marked for DDP or a vague group of Horsemen.

    Or Goldberg

    Having watched that match specifically now, I honestly thought it was bull**** (and 14yr old me would have thought the same), from the commentary burying WCW and Sting through the whole match to a **** ton of ****ery at the end that just made no flipping sense whatsoever.

    More than anything though you just cannot put Sting with the nWo, that's wrestling heresy. The nWo who were of course presented as WWF invaders trying to kill WCW so it doesn't even really make sense to have DX v nWo aside from "it being cool", but I could get past that without Sting in the middle.

    I tend to agree with MrSM that it seemed like an excuse for Hunter to get all his mates a payday and for Vince to once again bury WCW's legacy.
    Last edited by MrMichael; 30-03-15, 08:49 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • MrShawnMichaels
    replied
    Originally posted by Alex View Post
    Meh it was cool. DX vs NWO. 14 year old me would have been doing backflips. What's the point in treating it as anything different. Was a little jarring at first that it was NWO saving Sting, but other than that it was cool.
    Flair needed to be out there if anything!

    If it was truly following the storyline, it would have been DDP and Arn. Whilst the DX and nWo look old, those guys are even older lol.

    Leave a comment:


  • Alex
    replied
    Meh it was cool. DX vs NWO. 14 year old me would have been doing backflips. What's the point in treating it as anything different. Was a little jarring at first that it was NWO saving Sting, but other than that it was cool.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X